Minimal Invasive Surgery in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients; Short- and Long Term Results
NCT ID: NCT01506024
Last Updated: 2018-11-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-09-30
2014-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The objective is to register muscular strength, hip joint functionality/mobilisation and complications after total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed by the direct lateral approach (DLA), the posterior approach (PA) and the anterior approach (AA). The latter is a modified Smith-Petersen approach which follows the principles of minimally invasive surgery (MIS).
The primary working hypothesis is that due to a minimal dissection and reduced trauma in the muscles, patients will tolerate early hospital discharge better after the AA than the PA and the DLA. Patients in the AA group are also thought to be more active and maintain muscular strength and hip joint functionality/mobilisation better than patients in the lateral group.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Minimal Invasive Surgery in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients; Strength, Functionality and Post Operative Complications
NCT01959360
Comparison Between Anterior and Direct Lateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT01578746
Treatment and Rehabilitation of Patients With Hip Arthroplasty to Regain Walk and Work Efficiency and Quality of Life
NCT00638417
Unilateral vs Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT00764335
Comparative Study of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT04311125
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
MIS is defined as a surgical approach performed through a short skin and muscle incision to avoid injury to muscles and tendons. Following minimally invasive approach reduced muscle trauma has been found. Moreover clinical outcome improved, as the gluteus medius muscle can be spared more successfully. However, it is debated whether or not the overall results of MIS are superior, or even as good as the traditional hip replacement surgery in terms of component placing and time to revision of the prosthesis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
THA Direct lateral
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) carried out by direct lateral approach (DLA)
Total hip arthroplasty direct lateral approach
THA Posterior
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) carried out by posterior approach (DLA)
Total hip arthroplasty posterior approach
THA Anterior
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) carried out by anterior approach (DLA)
Total hip arthroplasty, anterior approach
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Total hip arthroplasty direct lateral approach
Total hip arthroplasty posterior approach
Total hip arthroplasty, anterior approach
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis as the main cause for elective THA
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score I, II, and stable III
Exclusion Criteria
* Current heart/pulmonary- or malignant diseases likely to influence the physical testing performance.
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. Olavs Hospital
OTHER
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lars Jacob Stovner, prof
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Olavs Hospital
Trondheim, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Winther SB, Husby VS, Foss OA, Wik TS, Svenningsen S, Engdal M, Haugan K, Husby OS. Muscular strength after total hip arthroplasty. A prospective comparison of 3 surgical approaches. Acta Orthop. 2016 Feb;87(1):22-8. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1068032. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
Winther SB, Foss OA, Husby OS, Wik TS, Klaksvik J, Husby VS. Muscular strength and function after total hip arthroplasty performed with three different surgical approaches: one-year follow-up study. Hip Int. 2019 Jul;29(4):405-411. doi: 10.1177/1120700018810673. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011/450
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.