The Influence of Global Femoral-offset Changes After Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT ID: NCT02399670
Last Updated: 2015-10-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
222 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2010-09-30
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients were followed-up at 12 - 15 months postoperatively with self-administered WOMAC and EQ-5D questionnaires in addition to a clinical assessment with palpation of the operated hip and measurement of the abductor muscle strength.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Validity, Reliability and Reproducibility of Plain Radiographic Measurements After Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT02102334
Comparing the Clinical Effects of Posterior Approach Versus Lateral Approach in Osteoarthritis Patients With a THA
NCT01616667
Adaptation of Locomotor Activity in Patients Suffering From Hip OA - Analysis of This Adaptation as a Prognostic Criterion for Future Disease Progression
NCT01907503
Predictive Model for Postoperative Complications in Hemi-hip Arthroplasty
NCT03375268
Changes in Postural Stability Following THA for OA
NCT06088160
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients were followed-up at 12 - 15 months postoperatively with self-administered WOMAC and EQ-5D questionnaires in addition to a clinical assessment. Patients completed an additional questionnaire enquiring about any residual problems with the use of walking aid and residual pain around the operated hip. During the clinical assessment, palpation of the operated hip and measurement of the abductor muscle strength were undertaken.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Decrease femoral offset
The FO of operated side was reduced more than 5mm compared with the contralateral side.
No interventions assigned to this group
Restored femoral offset
The FO of operated side was within 5mm restored compared with the contralateral side.
No interventions assigned to this group
Increased FO
The FO of operated side was increased more than 5mm compared with the contralateral side.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous spinal, pelvic or lower limb injuries or fractures
* Bilateral osteoarthritis
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sundsvall Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Arkan S Sayed-Noor, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Umeå University
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tezuka T, Inaba Y, Kobayashi N, Ike H, Kubota S, Kawamura M, Saito T. Effects of hip joint center location and femoral offset on abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. Mod Rheumatol. 2015 Jul;25(4):630-6. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2014.988863. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
Mahmood SS, Al-Amiry B, Mukka SS, Baea S, Sayed-Noor AS. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of plain radiographic measurements after total hip arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol. 2015 Mar;44(3):345-51. doi: 10.1007/s00256-014-2055-7. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
Berstock JR, Hughes AM, Lindh AM, Smith EJ. A radiographic comparison of femoral offset after cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2014 Dec 5;24(6):582-6. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000160. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
Sariali E, Klouche S, Mouttet A, Pascal-Moussellard H. The effect of femoral offset modification on gait after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2014 Apr;85(2):123-7. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.889980. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
Hayashi S, Nishiyama T, Fujishiro T, Hashimoto S, Kanzaki N, Nishida K, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M. Excessive femoral offset does not affect the range of motion after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2013 Jul;37(7):1233-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1881-x. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
Chamnongkich S, Asayama I, Kinsey TL, Mahoney OM, Simpson KJ. Difference in hip prosthesis femoral offset affects hip abductor strength and gait characteristics during obstacle crossing. Orthop Clin North Am. 2012 Nov;43(5):e48-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2012.07.008. Epub 2012 Sep 15.
Cassidy KA, Noticewala MS, Macaulay W, Lee JH, Geller JA. Effect of femoral offset on pain and function after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Dec;27(10):1863-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
Mahmood SS, Mukka SS, Crnalic S, Wretenberg P, Sayed-Noor AS. Association between changes in global femoral offset after total hip arthroplasty and function, quality of life, and abductor muscle strength. A prospective cohort study of 222 patients. Acta Orthop. 2016 Feb;87(1):36-41. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1091955. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SMD_III
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.