Direct Superior Approach (DSA) vs Posterior Approach (PA) in THA

NCT ID: NCT04191993

Last Updated: 2023-06-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-06-12

Study Completion Date

2022-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is a highly effective treatment for patients with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis. The surgical approach in THA is important as it influences postoperative clinical recovery, functional outcomes, and implant positioning \[1\]. The evolution of surgical techniques in THA has led to the development of minimally invasive surgery, which is performed through smaller skin incisions, reduced soft tissue disruption and greater muscle preservation \[2-10\]. This prospective, randomised control study compares clinical and radiological outcomes in THA performed using the standard posterior approach (PA) and its less invasive modification, the direct superior approach (DSA). The study will include 80 patients with hip osteoarthritis undergoing THA. Following informed consent, patients will be randomised to one of the two treatment groups, and undergo THA using either the PA or DSA. The control group includes patients undergoing THA through the PA while the investigation group includes patients undergoing THA with the DSA. A further 25 patients randomly selected from each treatment group will undergo radiosteriometric analysis (RSA) to assess differences in early implant migration between PA and DSA groups.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of interest will be recorded by blinded observers at regular intervals for 2 years after surgery. The findings of this study will enable an improved understanding of differences in postoperative clinical recovery, functional outcomes, and implant positioning in THA performed using the DSA compared to the PA approach.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Surgery Surgical Incision Patient Satisfaction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Direct Superior Approach (DSA)

Direct superior incision during surgery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Total hip arthroplasty

Intervention Type DEVICE

Surgical intervention designed to replace arthritic joint with artificial implant

Posterior Approach (PA)

Posterior approach incision during surgery

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Total hip arthroplasty

Intervention Type DEVICE

Surgical intervention designed to replace arthritic joint with artificial implant

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Total hip arthroplasty

Surgical intervention designed to replace arthritic joint with artificial implant

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient has hip osteoarthritis requiring primary THA

* Patient and surgeon are in agreement that THA is the most appropriate treatment
* Patient is fit for surgical intervention following review by surgeon and anaesthetist
* Patient age: Patients 18-80 years of age inclusive
* Gender: male and female
* Patient must be capable of giving informed consent and agree to comply with the postoperative review program
* Patient must be a permanent resident in an area accessible to the study site
* Patient must have sufficient postoperative mobility to attend follow-up clinics and allow for radiographs to be taken

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient is not suitable for primary THA e.g. patient requires revision surgery for previously failed THA

* Patient is not medically fit for surgical intervention
* Patients under the age of 18 or over 80 years of age
* Patient is immobile or has another neurological condition affecting musculoskeletal function
* Patient is already enrolled on another concurrent clinical trial
* Patient is unable or unwilling to sign the informed consent form specific to this study
* Patient is unable to attend the follow-up programme
* Patient is non-resident in local area or expected to leave the catchment area postoperatively
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University College, London

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Ayuob A, Haddad FS. The direct superior approach versus posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: study protocol for a prospective double-blinded randomised control trial. Trials. 2020 Jun 19;21(1):546. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04484-y.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32560737 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

17/0426

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

On-Table Versus Off-Table Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT04831372 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA