Consequence of the Learning Curve in Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Replacement
NCT ID: NCT02645435
Last Updated: 2016-01-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
69 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-12-31
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Direct anterior approach to the hip (DAA) is being considered as one of the most promising minimally-invasive approaches in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Purpose of this study is to analyse influence of learning curve on clinical and radiographic outcome in direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip replacement.
Methods:
The first 30 patients operated with DAA (group B) were compared to 39 patients operated by Hardinge approach (group A). Peri-and postoperative complications, Harris Hip Score (HHS), implant positioning, experienced pain and patient satisfaction were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 32 months.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Clinical Outcomes After Direct Anterior Approach and Microposterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT03210844
A Trial Comparing Mini-posterior Approach and Direct Anterior Approach
NCT01024309
Efficiency and Safety of Navigation Aids in Total Hip Arthroplasty With Direct Anterior Approach
NCT07134036
Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) for Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): Capsular Resection Versus Capsular Flap Retention
NCT02970253
Rehabilitation After Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT06356116
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods:
The first 30 patients operated with DAA (group B) were compared to 39 patients operated by Hardinge approach (group A). Peri-and postoperative complications, Harris Hip Score (HHS), implant positioning, experienced pain and patient satisfaction were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 32 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hip direct anterior approach
Patients with hip arthritis
hip replacement
Total hip replacement
Lateral hip approach
Patients with hip arthritis
hip replacement
Total hip replacement
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
hip replacement
Total hip replacement
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Azienda Ospedaliera Bolognini di Seriate Bergamo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Riccardo Compagnoni
Medical Doctor
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AObolognini1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.