Gait Analysis and Clinical Outcomes of Anterior and Lateral Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty.

NCT ID: NCT06538519

Last Updated: 2024-08-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-03

Study Completion Date

2023-07-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this Prospective Randomized Study is to confirm presence or absence of differences in gait mechanics in direct anterior and lateral approaches for total hip arthroplasty. and to compare the clinical outcomes of both approaches.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

if the anterior approach to the hip is faster recovery than lateral approach? if the anterior approach to the hip has better gait mechanics than lateral approach?

Participants will:

undergo one of the two approaches for total hip arthroplasty. All patients will be followed up at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 18 months. gait analysis will be done at 6wks, 3m, and 18months.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

direct anterior approach group

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

total hip replacement using anterior approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

the anterior approach using an internervous plane between the tensor fascia latae and the sartorius muscle.

gait analysis at 6wks, 3 months and 18 months

Intervention Type DEVICE

gait analysis done in the gait lab at the mentioned postoperative periods

lateral approach group

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

total hip replacement using lateral approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the lateral approach partial detachment of the anterior one-third of the gluteus medius muscle.

gait analysis at 6wks, 3 months and 18 months

Intervention Type DEVICE

gait analysis done in the gait lab at the mentioned postoperative periods

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

total hip replacement using lateral approach

In the lateral approach partial detachment of the anterior one-third of the gluteus medius muscle.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

total hip replacement using anterior approach

the anterior approach using an internervous plane between the tensor fascia latae and the sartorius muscle.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

gait analysis at 6wks, 3 months and 18 months

gait analysis done in the gait lab at the mentioned postoperative periods

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with primary osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis of the hip who consented for treatment with a total hip arthroplasty (THA) through an anterior or lateral approach.
* Age between 20 - 60 years of age.
* The participant had to be independent and physically active, which characterized as having the capacity to carry out daily tasks, ascend two flights of stairs, and able to walk for 15 minutes.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with bilateral hip affection.
* Body mass index (BMI) greater than 40.
* Diagnosis other than primary osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis.
* Prior hip or spine surgery.
* chronic uncontrolled comorbidities, psychological disorders.
* American Society of Anaesthesiologists score (ASA) higher than 2
* chronic neurological deficits that influence gait.
* any limb length discrepancy more than 1 cm.
* Any postoperative complication that will lead to delay in weight bearing.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ain Shams University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ain Shams University Hospitals

Cairo, Abbasia, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wang Z, Bao HW, Hou JZ. Direct anterior versus lateral approaches for clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Feb 26;14(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1095-z.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30808382 (View on PubMed)

Pospischill M, Kranzl A, Attwenger B, Knahr K. Minimally invasive compared with traditional transgluteal approach for total hip arthroplasty: a comparative gait analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Feb;92(2):328-37. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01086.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20124059 (View on PubMed)

Yue C, Kang P, Pei F. Comparison of Direct Anterior and Lateral Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Dec;94(50):e2126. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002126.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26683920 (View on PubMed)

Graves SC, Dropkin BM, Keeney BJ, Lurie JD, Tomek IM. Does Surgical Approach Affect Patient-reported Function After Primary THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Apr;474(4):971-81. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4639-5. Epub 2015 Nov 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26620966 (View on PubMed)

Alecci V, Valente M, Crucil M, Minerva M, Pellegrino CM, Sabbadini DD. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a direct anterior approach versus the standard lateral approach: perioperative findings. J Orthop Traumatol. 2011 Sep;12(3):123-9. doi: 10.1007/s10195-011-0144-0. Epub 2011 Jul 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21748384 (View on PubMed)

Reichert JC, Volkmann MR, Koppmair M, Rackwitz L, Ludemann M, Rudert M, Noth U. Comparative retrospective study of the direct anterior and transgluteal approaches for primary total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2015 Dec;39(12):2309-13. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2732-8. Epub 2015 Mar 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25795247 (View on PubMed)

Ilchmann T, Gersbach S, Zwicky L, Clauss M. Standard Transgluteal versus Minimal Invasive Anterior Approach in hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Consecutive Cohort Study. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2013 Nov 6;5(4):e31. doi: 10.4081/or.2013.e31. eCollection 2013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24416475 (View on PubMed)

Yoo JI, Cha YH, Kim KJ, Kim HY, Choy WS, Hwang SC. Gait analysis after total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach versus anterolateral approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Feb 8;20(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2450-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30736783 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30736783/

Gait analysis after total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach versus anterolateral approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MD 03/2021

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.