Cup Revisions Through Anterior or Posterolateral Approach: an RCT

NCT ID: NCT05508958

Last Updated: 2022-09-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

68 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-08

Study Completion Date

2026-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

With increasing numbers of total hip arthroplasties performed each year, the incidence of problems related to loosening and wear of total hip arthroplasties is expected to also increase. While the anterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty has demonstrated to result in a faster short-term recovery than the traditional lateral and posterior approach, this effect has not yet been investigated in revision surgery. Accelerating functional outcome may increase patient satisfaction and reduce healthcare costs.

The primary objective is to assess whether isolated cup revision surgery through the anterior approach results in increased functional status and higher patient satisfaction than through the posterolateral approach.

This is a prospective Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) in which 68 patients will be included (34 per group). Patients will be evaluated preoperatively and 6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year postoperatively.

The main endpoints are functional recovery as measured with the 30-sec Chair Stand Test (30s-CST), 40m Fast Paced Walking Test (40m FPWT) and the Stair Climb Test (SCT).

Secondary endpoints are Modified Borg scale outcomes after the functional tests, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain (rest/movement), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), HOOS-PS, EQ-5D-5L, satisfaction, cup inclination and complications at 30 days and 90 days postoperatively.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Loosening, Prosthesis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized Controlled Trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Physiotherapist assessing functional tests will be blinded for treatment. Data analyst will be blinded for treatment.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Anterior approach

Cup revision surgery through the anterior approach

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Anterior approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anterior approach

Posterolateral approach

Cup revision surgery through the posterolateral approach

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Posterolateral approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Posterolateral approach

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Anterior approach

Anterior approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Posterolateral approach

Posterolateral approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18
* On waiting list or scheduled for isolated cup revision surgery through anterior or posterolateral approach
* A good command of the Dutch language

Exclusion Criteria

* Revision for confirmed or suspected infection
* Not suitable for both approaches under study, as judged by orthopaedic surgeon
* Unable to fully understand study information and to accurately/reliably complete the questionnaires, as judged by researcher and/or orthopaedic surgeon
* Unable to accurately follow instructions for study procedures / measurements, as judged by researcher and/or orthopaedic surgeon
* Unwilling to sign informed consent form
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Reinier Haga Orthopedisch Centrum

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

M. Rutgers, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Reinier Haga Orthopedisch Centrum

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Reinier Haga Orthopedic Center

Zoetermeer, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OC-2020-018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Hip Socket Erosion Study
NCT06096883 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION