A Randomized Study of Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT ID: NCT01613508
Last Updated: 2018-12-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
116 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-01-31
2018-02-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Randomised Trial Comparing Anterior Versus Posterior Approach in Total Hip Replacement
NCT01106560
A Trial Comparing Mini-posterior Approach and Direct Anterior Approach
NCT01024309
Comparative Study of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT04311125
Study of Two Surgical Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT00881998
Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Hip Versus Standard Approach
NCT00261040
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Direct Anterior Approach
An oblique incision is made over the anterior margin of the tensor muscle. The fascia of the tensor muscle is identified and incised. The muscle is swept digitally laterally and a retractor is placed over the superior aspect of the femoral neck. The hip capsule is then incised and retracted.
Direct Anterior Approach
Mini-Posterior Approach
The surgical approach involved a 7 to 9.5 cm incision along the posterior aspect of the femur starting at the tip of the greater trochanter and proceeding distally. The fascia of the gluteus maximus was split, and blunt dissection revealed the underlying abductor and external rotator musculature. The external rotators an the hip capsule were incised and preserved as one layer, with an attempt being made to preserve the insertion of the quadratus femoris on the femur. The hip was dislocated posteriorly and the femoral neck was cut in accordance with the preoperative plan.
Mini-Posterior Approach
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Direct Anterior Approach
Mini-Posterior Approach
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Study participants must be able to give informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
2. The presence of infections, highly communicable diseases, e.g. AIDS, active tuberculosis, venereal disease, hepatitis.
3. Significant neurological or musculoskeletal disorders or disease that may adversely affect normal gait or weight bearing.
4. Presence of previous prosthetic hip replacement device (any type).
5. Active Metastatic disease
6. Active major Psychiatric illness
7. Active Drug or alcohol abuse
8. BMI \> 40.
9. Patients that are known to be pregnant
10. Actively failing contralateral hip replacement.
20 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael J. Taunton, M.D.
PI
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Taunton, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mayo Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
12-001341
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.