Comparing the Clinical Effects of Posterior Approach Versus Lateral Approach in Osteoarthritis Patients With a THA

NCT ID: NCT01616667

Last Updated: 2015-06-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-05-31

Study Completion Date

2015-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical outcome of the two different, but widely used, surgical approaches (Posterior approach and Lateral approach) of primary total hip arthroplasty in patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis. This study is divided into one main study and two sub-studies. The main study investigates the patient-reported outcome measures (questionnaire) within the first year post surgery. The two sub-studies investigate; i) the level of physical function and pain within the first 3 month after surgery, and ii) investigate the potential difference the two approaches have on gait-patterns and maximal isometric hip-muscle-strength, within the first year after surgery. Both approaches are described with potential drawbacks. Posterior approach has a higher risk of dislocation of the prostheses and revision due to dislocation compared with Lateral approach. Contrary, Lateral approach is described with the potential drawbacks of pain, lower physical function, gait abnormalities and muscle weakness, leading to less satisfied patients. However, according to a Cochrane analysis from 2004 concludes, more investigation is needed to determine the extent of differences.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Unilateral Primary Osteoarthritis of Hip

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Modified direct lateral approach

The patients included is operated with a total hip arthroplasty using a modified direct lateral approach

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Total hip arthroplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The patients included is operated with a total hip arthroplasty due to primary osteoarthritis

Posterior approach

The patients included is operated with a total hip arthroplasty using posterior approach

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Total hip arthroplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The patients included is operated with a total hip arthroplasty due to primary osteoarthritis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Total hip arthroplasty

The patients included is operated with a total hip arthroplasty due to primary osteoarthritis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age: 45-70 years, both included.
* Patients schedule for primary cementless total hip arthroplasty.
* Endstage hip osteoarthritis(OA) or minor dysplasia of the hip(CE-angle \> 20 degrees).

Exclusion Criteria

1. more major joint (hip or knee) than the current hip affected with OA, with expected joint replacement surgery within a year.
2. Prior joint replacement surgery on any major joint (hip, knee) in lower limb.
3. BMI above 35.
4. Any physical disability that prevents patients from walking 20 meters without aid.
5. The patients is not suitable for standard cementless prosthetic components.
6. Any neurological disease (ex. cerebral thrombosis, Parkinson) compromising the walking ability.
7. Any severe medical condition compromising walking ability (ex. chronic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease).
8. Severe dementia.
9. Inability to read and understand Danish writing and oral instructions.
10. Do not want to participate
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Orthopaedic department of Køge Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Region Zealand

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Region of Southern Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Southern Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Danish Rheumatism Association

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bevica Fonden

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bjarne Jensens Fond

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Odense University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Signe Rosenlund, MD, ph.d. student

MD, ph.d.-student

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Signe Rosenlund, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Odense University Hospital and University of Southern Denmark

Søren Overgaard, MD, Professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Odense University Hospital and University of Southern Denmark

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Odense University Hospital

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rosenlund S, Broeng L, Overgaard S, Jensen C, Holsgaard-Larsen A. The efficacy of modified direct lateral versus posterior approach on gait function and hip muscle strength after primary total hip arthroplasty at 12months follow-up. An explorative randomised controlled trial. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2016 Nov;39:91-99. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.09.011. Epub 2016 Sep 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27721093 (View on PubMed)

Rosenlund S, Broeng L, Jensen C, Holsgaard-Larsen A, Overgaard S. The effect of posterior and lateral approach on patient-reported outcome measures and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis, undergoing total hip replacement: a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Oct 27;15:354. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-354.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25345483 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

A2116 Signe Rosenlund

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

11/28589

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

S-20120009

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PT vs no PT Following THA
NCT02687945 COMPLETED NA