Minimal Invasive Surgery in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients; Strength, Functionality and Post Operative Complications
NCT ID: NCT01959360
Last Updated: 2019-05-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
59 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-08-31
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The objective is to register muscular strength, hip joint functionality/mobilisation and complications after total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed by two minimal invasive/incision surgeries (MIS) versus the traditionally lateral approach.
The primary working hypothesis is that due to a minimal dissection and reduced trauma in the muscles, patients will tolerate early hospital discharge better after MIS than after traditional lateral surgery. Patients in the MIS group will also be more active and maintain muscular strength and hip joint functionality/mobilisation better than patients in the lateral group.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Minimal Invasive Surgery in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients; Short- and Long Term Results
NCT01506024
Unilateral vs Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT00764335
Outcomes 8 Years After Minimal Invasive THA
NCT03657953
Comparison Between Anterior and Direct Lateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT01578746
Anterior Minimal Invasive Surgery Versus Antero-lateral Approach in Hip Joint Hemiarthroplasty
NCT05255198
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Minimal incision/invasive surgery (MIS) is defined as a surgical approach performed through a short skin and muscle incision to avoid injury to muscles and tendons. Following minimally invasive approach reduced muscle trauma has been found. Moreover clinical outcome improved, as the gluteus medius muscle can be spared more successfully. However, it is debated whether or not the overall results of MIS are superior, or even as good as the traditional hip replacement surgery in terms of component placing and time to revision of the prosthesis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
direct lateral
Direct lateral
Total hip replacement; direct lateral approach
minimal invasive
minimal invasive
Total hip replacement; minimal invasive approach
modified minimal invasive
modified minimal invasive
Total hip replacement; modified minimal invasive approach
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Direct lateral
Total hip replacement; direct lateral approach
minimal invasive
Total hip replacement; minimal invasive approach
modified minimal invasive
Total hip replacement; modified minimal invasive approach
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis as the main cause for elective THA
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score I, II, and stable III
Exclusion Criteria
* Current heart/pulmonary- or malignant diseases likely to influence the physical testing performance.
25 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. Olavs Hospital
OTHER
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lars Jacob Stovner, prof
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St Olavs Hospital
Trondheim, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
100889
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.