Comparison of Two Cementing Techniques of the Femoral Component in a Hip Prosthesis
NCT ID: NCT01952067
Last Updated: 2022-05-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-03-31
2017-06-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Furthermore pain, postoperative outcome and patient satisfaction will be assessed.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
SmartSet HV and Palacos R RSA Bone Cements in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT00837850
Polarstem Versus Corail; a Comparison of Micromotion and Periprosthetic Bone Remodelling of Two Femoral Stems
NCT05815953
Uncemented Compared to Cemented Femoral Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT02247791
Efficacy and Safety of Cemented and Cementless Prostheses for Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures in the Elderly
NCT03193697
Selecting the Right Hip Prosthesis for Young Patients
NCT03279276
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
line-to-line reaming
Corail cemented femoral stem using line-to-line reaming and cementing technique, 28mm Alumine Biolox forte femoral head, Marathon cup
line-to-line reaming and cementing technique
standard over-reaming
Corail cemented femoral stem using standard over-reaming with 2 broach sizes, 28mm Alumine Biolox forte femoral head, Marathon cup
standard over-reaming with 2 broach sizes
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
line-to-line reaming and cementing technique
standard over-reaming with 2 broach sizes
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis or post-traumatic arthritis
* Patients who understand the conditions of the study and are willing and able to comply with the post-operative scheduled clinical and radiographic evaluations and the prescribed rehabilitation
* Patient who signed the Ethics Committee approved specific Informed Consent Form prior to surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who will receive a THR without cement
* Patients who have had a prior procedure of osteotomy on the femur
* Obese patients where obesity is severe enough to affect subject's ability to perform activities of daily living (body mass index, kg/m2: BMI \>35)
* Patients with active or suspected infection
* Patients with malignancy
55 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kristiansund Hospital
OTHER
St. Olavs Hospital
OTHER
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Otto Schnell Husby, md phd
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kristiansund Hospital
Kristiansund, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sevaldsen K, Schnell Husby O, Lian OB, Farran KM, Schnell Husby V. Is the French Paradox cementing philosophy superior to the standard cementing? A randomized controlled radiostereometric trial and comparative analysis. Bone Joint J. 2022 Jan;104-B(1):19-26. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B1.BJJ-2021-0325.R2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4.2008.1996
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.