Comparison of Two Cementing Techniques of the Femoral Component in a Hip Prosthesis

NCT ID: NCT01952067

Last Updated: 2022-05-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

48 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-03-31

Study Completion Date

2017-06-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary aim of the study is to compare migration of the cemented Corail stem representing polished surfaced versions of the femoral stem. Two different methods will be used for reaming the femoral canal and cementing of the stem. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) will be used in migration measurements.

Furthermore pain, postoperative outcome and patient satisfaction will be assessed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis, Hip

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

line-to-line reaming

Corail cemented femoral stem using line-to-line reaming and cementing technique, 28mm Alumine Biolox forte femoral head, Marathon cup

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

line-to-line reaming and cementing technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

standard over-reaming

Corail cemented femoral stem using standard over-reaming with 2 broach sizes, 28mm Alumine Biolox forte femoral head, Marathon cup

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

standard over-reaming with 2 broach sizes

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

line-to-line reaming and cementing technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

standard over-reaming with 2 broach sizes

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients requiring cemented primary total hip replacement.
* Patients with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis or post-traumatic arthritis
* Patients who understand the conditions of the study and are willing and able to comply with the post-operative scheduled clinical and radiographic evaluations and the prescribed rehabilitation
* Patient who signed the Ethics Committee approved specific Informed Consent Form prior to surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who require revision of a previously implanted total hip replacement (THR)
* Patients who will receive a THR without cement
* Patients who have had a prior procedure of osteotomy on the femur
* Obese patients where obesity is severe enough to affect subject's ability to perform activities of daily living (body mass index, kg/m2: BMI \>35)
* Patients with active or suspected infection
* Patients with malignancy
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kristiansund Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

St. Olavs Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Norwegian University of Science and Technology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Otto Schnell Husby, md phd

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kristiansund Hospital

Kristiansund, , Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sevaldsen K, Schnell Husby O, Lian OB, Farran KM, Schnell Husby V. Is the French Paradox cementing philosophy superior to the standard cementing? A randomized controlled radiostereometric trial and comparative analysis. Bone Joint J. 2022 Jan;104-B(1):19-26. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B1.BJJ-2021-0325.R2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34969272 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4.2008.1996

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Lubinus SPII Hip Stem Target Trial Emulation (LARGE)
NCT06367829 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION