Preheating of Femur Component in Hybrid Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT ID: NCT00319085
Last Updated: 2015-04-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-05-31
2010-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Recently published studies confirm that preheating of femoral component enhances shear strength of implant-cement interface. Both Iesaka et al 2003 and Jafri et al 2004 showed reduction in cement porosity on cement-implant interface with preheated femur components. We will use the radiostereometry analysis (RSA) to investigate how the preheating of femur component influence on prosthesis survivorship. There are no clinical controlled studies performed to the date.
The aim of the study
* Comparison of the migration rates between preheated and non-preheated femur components, analyzed with RSA.
Methods
* Randomization of 80 patients into 2 groups with 40 in each. All patients will undergo standard hybrid total hip replacement. In group one the femur component (Bi-Metric, Interlock Biomet) will be preheated to 40 degrees of Celsius before cementation. In group two: the control group, the femur component will be of room temperature. We will measure the temperature at cement bone interface during the operation with use of thermocouple electrodes inserted through separate drill hole in the femur. The measurements will be recorded every 10 seconds. The patients will follow the standard postoperative rehabilitation program.
* The RSA analysis will be performed the first day after the operation and at 3, 12, 24 months postoperatively.
* The Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning (DEXA) of the femur will be performed at the first week after the operation and at 12 and 24 months postoperatively.
* The patients will be followed both clinically and radiologically at 1 and 2 years after the operation (Harris Hip Score).
* The results will be expressed as mean + SD (in mm). ANOVA statistical analysis will be used to confirm the differences between the groups.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Compaction Femur Preparation for Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Unilateral
NCT00318396
Regression Discontinuity Design Search for Differences in Mortality and Revision for Fixation Type of THA
NCT05108155
Compaction Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Bilateral
NCT00317889
Evaluation of the Wear of Vitamin E Treated Polyethylene Components in Primary THA Using RSA
NCT00551967
CT-based 3D Planning, Computer Navigation and Subsequent Migration Analysis in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT05159206
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Total hip replacement (Preheating of femur stem)
Total hybrid hip arthroplasty, cementation of femural component, preheating, radiostereometry, DEXA
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* The patients with cancer
* The secondary coxarthrosis after the trauma
* Any vascular or neuromuscular diseases affecting the hip.
70 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Northern Orthopaedic Division, Denmark
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mogens B Jørgensen, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northern Orthopaedic Division, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
Mogens B Laursen, M.D., Ph.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northern Orthopaedic Division, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
Lotte Borgwardt, dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Frederikberg Hospital, Copenhagen
Kjeld Søballe, Ph.D., MD.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University Hospital of Aarhus
Poul T Nielsen, M.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Northern Orthopaedic Division, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Farsoe Hospital, Northern Orthopaedic Division
Farsø, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ON-04-008a-JPE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.