CT-based 3D Planning, Computer Navigation and Subsequent Migration Analysis in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT ID: NCT05159206
Last Updated: 2025-06-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
27 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-04-01
2024-12-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In addition to planning and navigation, the same system can be used to measure the migration of the prosthesis in relation to the bone over time using AI by comparing multiple scans. The investigators aim to follow all patients for 2 years (total of 4 CT scans after surgery) with the intention to be able to foresee implant loosening.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cup Position in THA With Standard Instruments
NCT03189303
Comparison of the Restoration of Hip Biomechanical Parameters by CT Measurement Between the 3 Surgical Techniques: RSA/Minihip/THA - Hip Replacement: 3D Planning
NCT06272422
Importance of Restoring Biomechanical Correct Hip Anatomy During Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT01512550
A Comparison of Impingement Free Range of Motion With CT Scan After Manual and Robotic Total Hip Replacement
NCT05507073
Benefit of Orthopedic Navigation in the ARThroplasty of the Hip
NCT01496300
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In THA surgery, the goal is to recreate the natural motion-center of the hip, adjust for possible leg length differences and to optimize prosthetic placement to reduce the risk of future dislocation or loosening. Today, usually a plain X-ray is taken before the operation to plan size and position. This has its limitations since the surgeon can not assess the 3D position on a 2D image. In this study, the investigators are using a new system for planning in 3D, based on a low-dose CT scan and with the help of AI. Moreover, the surgeon get real-time information of the prosthetic position during surgery (called navigation), after matching the physical patient to a virtual patient. The hypothesis is that prosthetic placement and patient satisfaction will improve with 3D planning and navigation, resulting in a more anatomical restoration, and that postoperative complications, such as dislocation and ultimately loosening will reduce.
Entering this study entails taking a CT scan before surgery (instead of a plain X-ray), and for validation, a postoperative CT scan. This enables the investigators to find out whether the planning and navigation are confirmed by the postoperative position. In addition to planning and navigation, the investigators wish to implement a way of measuring prosthetic migration after surgery. Today, this is done by implanting small metal (tantalum) markers in the bone during surgery, and then measuring the distance between prosthesis and markers over time in a special software on multiple X-rays (This method is called RSA, Radiostereometric Analysis). However, few hospitals have the expertise or equipment to do these analyses and it is a somewhat laborious process. This study will evaluate a new tool for making equivalent migration analysis, based on CT scans. By matching the postoperative CT image to subsequent CT scans at 3 months, 1 and 2 years after surgery, the investigators can see how much the prosthesis has moved in relation to the bone and hopefully being able to foresee future loosening. The hypotheses is that CT migration analysis will be as accurate and precise as the current gold standard (RSA). A subset of the patients will have RSA performed as well for direct comparison between the systems regarding migration.
A transition from plain X-ray images to low-dose CT will result in a marginal increase in the radiation dose. At the same time, it means that a much more accurate imaging of the skeleton is performed, and thus improved preoperative planning and a per-operative navigation can be done with much more predictable results. This study has been approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority, as well as the local radiation committee. The company, Ortoma, supplying the measurement system for planning and navigation (Ortoma Treatment Solution (OTS™)) has received ISO13485 certification and CE-certificate on all parts.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CT group
CT-scan preoperatively, postoperatively and at 3 months, 1 and 2 years. Per-operative navigation based on the CT scan.
CT group
This group will do a preoperative CT scan for templating. The same scan is then used for per-operative navigation. After surgery, a postoperative CT will validate the templating/navigation, and then subsequent CT scans (postoperative, 3 months, 1 and 2 years) will be done to measure prosthetic migration over time.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CT group
This group will do a preoperative CT scan for templating. The same scan is then used for per-operative navigation. After surgery, a postoperative CT will validate the templating/navigation, and then subsequent CT scans (postoperative, 3 months, 1 and 2 years) will be done to measure prosthetic migration over time.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Qualified for total hip arthroplasty surgery at the regional Hospital
Exclusion Criteria
* Unable to comprehend the patient information
* Other cause for assessing the patient as ineligible (such as: serious medical comorbidity or active drug abuse)
40 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Region Skane
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gunnar Flivik, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dept of Orthpaedics, Skane University Hospital, Sweden
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Orthopedics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University
Lund, Skåne County, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
OTS plan, nav, migr
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.