A Comparison of the Design of Tibia Stems in Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty - Wedge Stem Versus I-beam Stem.
NCT ID: NCT00175136
Last Updated: 2023-01-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
54 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-01-31
2009-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Comparison of Fixation Method in Total Knee Arthroplasty - Low Viscosity Versus High Viscosity Bone Cement
NCT00175162
Comparison of Stability and Outcomes in Single-radius Femoral Component for Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT01379755
Long-Term Comparison of Fixed- and Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasties (TKAs) in Patients With OA ≤50 Years Old
NCT01361152
Stability of Uncemented Medially Stabilized TKA
NCT04017533
Cemented vs. Cementless TKA
NCT04597684
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Implant design, method of fixation and the bone mass density has a large influence on implant stability. Fixation of the tibia base plates in total knee arthroplasty can be obtained by different designs of anchorage in the tibia e.g. central round stems, fins and pegs. The smaller the tibia stem; the lesser amount of bone is lost at implantation and following revisions rendering probable a time gain before secondary arthrodesis is necessary. The tibia stem cannot be to tiny either because it has to be able to resist the load of shearing forces naturally presented by the knee kinetics.
In this project we are using modularly tibia components with a central wedge- and I-beam shaped stem respectively. Both type of prosthesis are consolidated in the bone by bone cement applied under the base-plate while the stem is fixed press-fit (without cement) in the proximal tibia.
The purpose of this study is to compare the early migration of two cemented total knee implants with different tibial stem design by RSA (radio stereophotogrammetric analysis). Furthermore, we will make research into the periprosthetic bone and it's changes after surgery using DEXA. Finally the extend of the expected micromovements between the polyethylene liner and the metal backing of the titanium plateau will be compared and taken into account with the results.
Tibia wedge stems are exposed to the greatest load test by shearing forces while block stems are bearing the greater load with compression and some scientists therefore speculate that block-designs are better than wedge-designs. This project is set up to explain the theoretical speculations about design and implant survival. The durability of the implants have been tested in account of fatigue and durability in a 80-20 test and they're both able to resist 4-6 times bodyweight. Furthermore, the polyethylene is produced by direct compression molding making it very resistant to wear.
To evaluate both the implant-bone micromotions and the polyethylene-implant micromovements metal markers have been placed on the implant prior to surgery and furthermore into the tibial bone and into the tibial polyethylene intra-operatively allowing us to evaluate stereo x-rays by a photogrammetric computer analyses called RSA at the Orthopaedic Center, Aarhus University Hospital. Follow-up stereo x-rays will be scheduled for 1 week, 3 months, 6 month, 1 years and 2 years post-surgery. Periprostetic bone density will be evaluated at 1 week, 1 year and 2 years upon inclusion at the Orthopaedic Center, Aarhus University Hospital.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
I-beam
I-beam stem design of tibial component for Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Maxim TKA
Operation with Total Knee Arthroplasty and either an I-beam stem or a wedge stem of the tibial component.
wedge
Wedge stem design of tibial component for Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Maxim TKA
Operation with Total Knee Arthroplasty and either an I-beam stem or a wedge stem of the tibial component.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Maxim TKA
Operation with Total Knee Arthroplasty and either an I-beam stem or a wedge stem of the tibial component.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with a sufficient bone quality for implantation of knee prosthesis.
* Informed and written patient consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who peroperatively are estimated unsuitable for knee arthroplasty e.g. due to bone cysts or dilution of the bone mass.
* Patients who use non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and cannot refrain from taking them postoperatively (this includes COX-2-inhibitors).
* Patients with osteoporosis estimated from the preoperative x-ray or former diagnosis of osteoporosis.
* Patients with knee arthrosis following fracture sequelae.
* Women, who are pregnant or are at risk of getting pregnant throughout the 2 year follow-up.
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aarhus University Hospital
OTHER
University of Aarhus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kjeld Søballe, MD, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Orthopaedic Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Tage-Hansens Gade 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Orthopaedic Center, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20030239
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.