Long-term Outcomes of Conical Tapered Stems in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Due to Congenital Hip Pathologies
NCT ID: NCT04748458
Last Updated: 2022-03-22
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
85 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-07-17
2021-10-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ceramic-on-ceramic THA for Post-traumatic Hip Osteoarthritis After Acetabular Fracture
NCT04034043
Biomechanical Reconstruction of Three Different Hip Stem Designs in Hip Dysplasia Using a 3D CT-based Planning Software
NCT04904640
Capsulectomy vs Capsulotomy in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Clinical Outcomes and Proprioception Evaluation
NCT02749058
A Short Metaphyseal Fitting Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young and Elderly Patients
NCT01345097
Uncemented Compared to Cemented Femoral Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT02247791
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To date, no guidelines exist about the correct choice of hip implant in congenital hip pathologies: only mid-term case series are available. Conical tapered stems have been frequently suggested for the most difficult cases.
The aim of this study is to describe the survival rates and the long-term clinical and radiological outcome of conical tapered stems in THAs after congenital hip pathologies.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Congenital hip pathologies
Conical tapered stem for osteoarthritis due to congenital hip pathologies
Conical tapered stem
Implantation of conical tapered stem
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Conical tapered stem
Implantation of conical tapered stem
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Consecutive population with a minimum follow-up of 2 years
* Cementless total hip arthroplasty with conical tapered stem
* Pre-operative planning using CT
* Complete clinical and radiographic assessment
Exclusion Criteria
* Other type of implants
* Inadequate pre-operative planning (eg: no CT)
* Incomplete clinical and radiographic assessment
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Francesco Traina, Prof
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, ITaly
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chirurgia Protesica e dei Reimpianti di Anca e Ginocchio, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
Bologna, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Greber EM, Pelt CE, Gililland JM, Anderson MB, Erickson JA, Peters CL. Challenges in Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Setting of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9S):S38-S44. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.024. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
Perry KI, Berry DJ. Femoral considerations for total hip replacement in hip dysplasia. Orthop Clin North Am. 2012 Jul;43(3):377-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2012.05.010.
Argenson JN, Flecher X, Parratte S, Aubaniac JM. Anatomy of the dysplastic hip and consequences for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Dec;465:40-5. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3181576052.
Pak P, de Steiger R. Cone femoral prosthesis for osteoarthritis of the hip with femoral dysplasia. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2008 Aug;16(2):206-10. doi: 10.1177/230949900801600216.
Taniguchi N, Jinno T, Koga D, Hagino T, Okawa A, Haro H. Cementless Hip Stem Anteversion in the Dysplastic Hip: A Comparison of Tapered Wedge vs Metaphyseal Filling. J Arthroplasty. 2017 May;32(5):1547-1552. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.020. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
589/2020/Oss/IOR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.