Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-11-30
2014-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators will enroll 44 patients who have consented to total hip arthroplasty for treatment of hip pathology. This treatment is a standard of care. Patients will receive standard of care pre- and post-operative care and placement of standard of care implants all of which are commercially available and FDA approved for general use for the clinical indications used in these patients. All patients will receive a pre-operative CT scan for surgical planning and comparison with post-operative CT scan. The difference in intervention between the groups will be the creation and use of real-time instrument from the pre-operative planning session. These instruments will be used for placement of an indexing peripheral guide wire to direct acetabular preparation and placement of the shell assisting standard surgical instruments.
The post-operative scan will be performed within two weeks of the surgery for both the treatment and control groups. The investigators will analyze the difference in acetabular shell placement (acetabular version and abduction angle) from the pre-operatively planned CT scan. These differences will be compared between the control and experimental groups.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Acetabular Shell Positioning Using Patient Specific Instruments
NCT01791738
Real Time 3D Imaging and Surrogate Bone Model
NCT02204007
Survivorship, Radiographic, and Functional Outcomes of the Multihole Revision Acetabular Cup
NCT03031964
Observational Study Evaluating Outcomes of Hip Arthroplasty Using Tornier Dual Mobility Acetabular Cup
NCT02062450
Primary Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Replacement Versus Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing in Young Active Patients
NCT00285129
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard Total Hip Arthroplasty
Each surgeon will use their standard methods of pre-operative planning using pre-operative x-rays, and complete the procedure using standard surgical instruments for total hip arthroplasty.
Standard Total Hip Arthroplasty
Total hip arthroplasty performed according to standard of care
Real-time Instrumentation
Pre-operative planning through 3D software with design of real-time instrument intraoperatively using bone cement and surrogate bone model for placement of a guide pin to be used to aid in bone preparation for insertion of an acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty
Real-time Instrumentation
To prepare the acetabulum and place the implants on the day of surgery, surgeons will receive either parts necessary to create the real-time with a surrogate model of the acetabular surface or standard surgical alignment instruments provided by the manufacturer of the implant. For the experimental group, the surgeon will be provided with 3 parts necessary to create the real-time instrument: (1) a patient-specific surrogate bone model with a built-in guide pin trajectory which was planned in the 3D planning software, (2) a non-specific plastic arm available in different sizes, and (3) bone cement. The real-time instrument is created to position a peripheral guide wire on the acetabular rim to serve as a visual aid for reaming and impacting the acetabular shell using standard reaming tools supplied by the manufacturer. Once the acetabular shell is placed, the procedure is performed in the same manner for both groups, using the standard manufacturer instruments.
Standard Total Hip Arthroplasty
Total hip arthroplasty performed according to standard of care
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Real-time Instrumentation
To prepare the acetabulum and place the implants on the day of surgery, surgeons will receive either parts necessary to create the real-time with a surrogate model of the acetabular surface or standard surgical alignment instruments provided by the manufacturer of the implant. For the experimental group, the surgeon will be provided with 3 parts necessary to create the real-time instrument: (1) a patient-specific surrogate bone model with a built-in guide pin trajectory which was planned in the 3D planning software, (2) a non-specific plastic arm available in different sizes, and (3) bone cement. The real-time instrument is created to position a peripheral guide wire on the acetabular rim to serve as a visual aid for reaming and impacting the acetabular shell using standard reaming tools supplied by the manufacturer. Once the acetabular shell is placed, the procedure is performed in the same manner for both groups, using the standard manufacturer instruments.
Standard Total Hip Arthroplasty
Total hip arthroplasty performed according to standard of care
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Primary, unilateral anterior or posterior total hip arthroplasty
* 18 to 85 years old at time of surgery
* Able to get a pre- and post-operative CT scan at the Cleveland Clinic
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
* Incarceration
* Condition deemed by physician or medical staff to be non-conducive to patient's ability to complete the study, or a potential risk to the patient's health and well-being.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Cleveland Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Wael Barsoum
Vice-chairman, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Small T, Krebs V, Molloy R, Bryan J, Klika AK, Barsoum WK. Comparison of acetabular shell position using patient specific instruments vs. standard surgical instruments: a randomized clinical trial. J Arthroplasty. 2014 May;29(5):1030-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CCF 13-940
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.