Survivorship, Radiographic, and Functional Outcomes of the Multihole Revision Acetabular Cup
NCT ID: NCT03031964
Last Updated: 2022-01-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
24 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-12-31
2022-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Real-Time Instrument for Acetabular Shell Positioning
NCT02006251
Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups in Revision TJA
NCT04090359
A Multi-centre, Prospective Surveillance to Assess Mid-term Performance of the Mpact Cup
NCT02196818
Observational Study Evaluating Outcomes of Hip Arthroplasty Using Tornier Dual Mobility Acetabular Cup
NCT02062450
Restoration Anatomic Acetabular Shell Revision Study
NCT05591859
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
revision multihole acetabular cup
Revision total hip arthroplasty using multihole revision acetabular cup
revision multihole acetabular cup
post market study of multi hole revision acetabular cup
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
revision multihole acetabular cup
post market study of multi hole revision acetabular cup
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Femoral stem (either retained or replaced) is a compatible Stryker stem.
3. Patient is willing to comply with follow-up requirements (e.g. will return for long-term follow-up visits)
4. Age: 18-85 years
Exclusion Criteria
2. Exclude revision for infection
3. Patient is undergoing bilateral THA surgery or had prior hip arthroplasty on contralateral side less than 6 months from date of surgery
4. Patient has history of radiation therapy
5. Patient has known diagnosis of renal disease
6. Patient has known diagnosis of osteoporosis
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Cleveland Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Carlos Higuera-Rueda
Staff Surgeon
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Carlos Higuera, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Cleveland Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jafari SM, Bender B, Coyle C, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ. Do tantalum and titanium cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Feb;468(2):459-65. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1090-5.
Kremers HM, Howard JL, Loechler Y, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS, Berry DJ, Cabanela ME, Hanssen AD, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Lewallen DG. Comparative long-term survivorship of uncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jun 20;94(12):e82. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00549.
Unger AS, Lewis RJ, Gruen T. Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results of 60 hips. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Dec;20(8):1002-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.01.023.
Odri GA, Padiolleau GB, Gouin FT. Oversized cups as a major risk factor of postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Apr;29(4):753-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
Silverton CD, Rosenberg AG, Sheinkop MB, Kull LR, Galante JO. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a cementless acetabular component. Technique and results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Oct;(319):201-8.
Petrera P, Rubash HE. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Acetabular Component. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1995 Jan;3(1):15-21. doi: 10.5435/00124635-199501000-00003.
Klika AK, Murray TG, Darwiche H, Barsoum WK. Options for acetabular fixation surfaces. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2007;17(3):187-92. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v17.i3.20.
Ramappa M, Bajwa A, Kulkarni A, McMurtry I, Port A. Early results of a new highly porous modular acetabular cup in revision arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2009 Jul-Sep;19(3):239-44. doi: 10.1177/112070000901900309.
Frenkel SR, Jaffe WL, Dimaano F, Iesaka K, Hua T. Bone response to a novel highly porous surface in a canine implantable chamber. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004 Nov 15;71(2):387-91. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30104.
Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 1994 Feb;9(1):33-44. doi: 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90135-x.
Claus AM, Engh CA Jr, Sychterz CJ, Xenos JS, Orishimo KF, Engh CA Sr. Radiographic definition of pelvic osteolysis following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Aug;85(8):1519-26. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200308000-00013.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
#16-1030
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.