Metal on Metal Versus Ceramic on Metal Hip Replacement

NCT ID: NCT00208494

Last Updated: 2013-08-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

392 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-08-31

Study Completion Date

2011-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of artificial hips with metal heads and metal sockets to artificial hips with ceramic heads articulating with metal socket components. The success of the total hip arthroplasty (THA) will be based upon all of the following clinical and radiographic criteria being met at the two-year evaluation: (1) the patient's clinical results as measured using modified Harris Hip evaluation rating system, and the absence of a complication that requires the surgical removal or replacement of a component; and (2) radiographic findings at study endpoint (i.e., two years follow-up). Clinical and radiographic success at two (2) years postoperative is required for the study hip to be deemed successful.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, single blind, controlled clinical investigation comparing the safety and efficacy of the cementless Ceramic on Metal total hip prostheses versus the cementless Metal on Metal total hip prostheses.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non-inflammatory Joint Diseases

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Non-Inflammatory Degenerative Joint Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

Ceramic-on-metal total hip implant

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Total Hip Replacement

Intervention Type DEVICE

Total hip replacement

B

Metal-on-metal total hip implant

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Total hip replacement

Intervention Type DEVICE

Total hip replacement

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Total Hip Replacement

Total hip replacement

Intervention Type DEVICE

Total hip replacement

Total hip replacement

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Biolox Delta head; Ultamet insert; Pinnacle Acetabular shell CoCr M-head, Ultamet insert, Pinnacle Acetabular shell

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Able to (or capable of) provide consent to participate in the clinical investigation prior to the day of the surgery.
* Skeletally mature (tibial and femoral epiphyses are closed)
* Undergoing cementless primary hip replacement surgery for Noninflammatory Degenerative Joint Disease
* Affected hip has a Harris Hip Score of 70 or lower and a Pain rating of Moderate or greater
* Radiographic Parameters:
* X-Ray Evaluation confirms the presence of NIDJD
* Femoral and acetabular bone stock is sufficient, regarding strength and shape, and is suitable to receive the implants
* No structural bone grafts required to support to prosthetic component(s)or to shape the bone to receive implant(s)
* Willing to have knowledge of treatment arm (CoM or MoM) withheld for a period of 24 months post-operatively unless disclosure is legally and/or medically necessary
* Previous THA in contralateral hip that is greater than one (1) year postoperative and has a Harris Hip pain rating less than MILD

Exclusion Criteria

* Bilateral hip disease with the anticipated need for bilateral hip implant during study participation (i.e., within the next 24 months)
* THA required for the revision of a previously failed THA
* Suffering from inflammatory arthritis
* Prior prosthetic hip replacement
* Previous Girdlestone procedure or surgical fusion in the operative hip joint
* Above knee amputation of either the contralateral or ipsilateral leg
* Known allergy to metal (e.g. jewelry)
* The presence of highly communicable disease or diseases that may limit follow-up (e.g., immuno-compromised conditions, hepatitis, active tuberculosis, etc.)
* Significant neurological or musculoskeletal disorders or disease that may adversely affect gait or weight bearing (e.g., muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis)
* Conditions that may interfere with the total hip arthroplasty survival or outcome (e.g., Paget's disease, Charcot's disease)
* Unwilling or unable to comply with a rehabilitation program for a cementless THA or difficulty or inability to return for follow-up visits prescribed by the study protocol
* Known to be pregnant, a prisoner, mentally incompetent, and/or alcohol or drug abuser
* Previous treatment for renal disease
* Any systemic steroid therapy, excluding inhalers, within three months prior to surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

DePuy Orthopaedics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Scott, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Orthopaedic Specialty Clinic

Patrick G Kirk, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Shekhar S Desai, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Charles A Engh, Jr., MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Anderson Clinic

Ajai Cadambi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Adult Orthopaedic Reconstruction Texas Hip and Knee Center

C L Barnes, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Foundation for Musculoskeletal Research & Education

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Foundation for Musculoskeletal Research and Education

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Palm Bay, Florida, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Anderson Clinic

Alexandria, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Roanoke, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

03062

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id