Validation of the Effectiveness of the CFIR - ERIC Matching Tool in Implementation Research

NCT ID: NCT07184489

Last Updated: 2025-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

394 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-20

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this implementation study is to learn if the CFIR-ERIC matching tool is effective indeveloping implementation strategies for pediatric nurse. The evidence practised in this study is the pediatric venous access device selection decision tree from clinical practice guideline on infusion therapy in children. The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. Does the implementation strategies developed by CFIR-ERIC matching tool improve nurses knowledge in venous access devices selection.
2. Does the implementation strategies developed by CFIR-ERIC matching tool lower the error rate of appropriate venous access device selection.

Researchers will compare the CFIR-ERIC group to a blank group to see if CIFR-ERIC matching tool works to improve nurses knowleged and lower the error rate of venous access device selection.

Participants will:

1. Receive the implementation strategies made by CFIR-ERIC matching tool.
2. Using the pediatric venous access device selection decision trees in daily catheterization.
3. Record their venous access device selection informantion, consumables usage and pediatric patients' outcome.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Currently,the evidence-based practice research often isolates barrier assessment from implementation strategy development. At tne same time, many implementation science models being overly complex for clinicians. In Chinese, certain studies still neglect barrier assessment, demonstrate inconsistent conceptualization of implementation strategies, and rarely classify developed strategies.

As a tool for matching and selecting implementation strategies, the CFIR - ERIC matching tool has the characteristics of strong pertinence, repeatability, structuring, systematization, and simple and convenient operation compared with other models. Researchers can identify barrier factors through CFIR and use the CFIR - ERIC matching tool to match strategies to promote the implementation of clinical intervention measures.

This implementation study adopted a pre-post design using the CFIR-ERIC Matching Tool to analyze barriers and develop strategies. Grounded in the "Pediatric Venous Access Device Selection Decision Tree" from the 2021 clinical practice guideline on infusion therapy in children, the intervention was rolled out across 21 wards at the Children's Hospital of Fudan University.

The implementation process of the evidence was evaluated from four aspects using the RE-AIM framework , including the evaluation indicators corresponding to each dimension of patient reach, intervention efficacy, medical adoption, and guideline implementation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infusions, Intravenous Implementation Science

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CFIR-ERIC group

Develop implementation strategies for applying evidence to clinical practice using CFIR - ERIC matching tool.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

implementation strategies

Intervention Type OTHER

1. Analysis of barrier factors: A focus group interview will be conducted. Purposive sampling was used to include senior nurses in the ward, members of the evidence-based group, and doctors for the analysis of barrier factors. Then the CFIR-ERIC matching tool will be used to develop implementation strategies based on the barrier factors.
2. The best - worst scaling method will be used to generate relatively reliable and valid preference evidence of stakeholders for implementation strategies from CFIR-ERIC matching tool.
3. The implementation strategies will be developed specifically by an expert group. This group includes nursing managers and experts in evidence-based practice.
4. Implement the strategies.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

implementation strategies

1. Analysis of barrier factors: A focus group interview will be conducted. Purposive sampling was used to include senior nurses in the ward, members of the evidence-based group, and doctors for the analysis of barrier factors. Then the CFIR-ERIC matching tool will be used to develop implementation strategies based on the barrier factors.
2. The best - worst scaling method will be used to generate relatively reliable and valid preference evidence of stakeholders for implementation strategies from CFIR-ERIC matching tool.
3. The implementation strategies will be developed specifically by an expert group. This group includes nursing managers and experts in evidence-based practice.
4. Implement the strategies.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

pediatric venous access device selection decision tree

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Having worked at the research site for ≥ 1 year;
* Being able to independently perform nursing operations (having completed the content related to intravenous infusion in the standardized training of this hospital and passed the assessment).

Exclusion Criteria

* Not having obtained the nurse practice license;
* Refusing to participate in this study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Children's Hospital of Fudan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Children's Hospital of Fudan University

Shanghai, , China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yaliuhui WANG

Role: CONTACT

+86 18085293862

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ying Gu, Doctor

Role: primary

+86 13816881726

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHFudanU0814

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

COPM-Based Goal Setting Strategies in the PICU
NCT07128446 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
3D Port-A Catheter Model for New Staff
NCT06416943 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
High-Fidelity Simulation
NCT06935773 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA