Artificial Intelligence Assisted Teaching of Structured Nursing Care According to ERAS Protocol
NCT ID: NCT07183202
Last Updated: 2025-09-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-06-27
2025-07-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This randomized controlled, fully experimental study was conducted in the second semester of the 2024-2025 academic year with third-year students who had successfully completed the Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing course at the Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, at a state university located in western Turkey. Seventy students participated in the study and were assigned to either the AI-assisted case-based education group or the control group using block randomization. Data were collected using the ERAS Protocol Nursing Care Knowledge Test and the Multidimensional 21st Century Skills Scale. All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 27) and the PROCESS macro (Version 4.2) developed by Hayes. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic variables and baseline characteristics. Group equivalence at baseline was assessed using independent samples t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen's d and Cramér's V, as appropriate. To examine the effect of the intervention on 21st-century skills, a mixed-design ANOVA was performed with time (pretest, posttest) as the within-subjects factor and group (intervention, control) as the between-subjects factor. Partial eta squared (η²) was reported as a measure of effect size for within- and between-subjects effects. An independent samples t-test was also used to compare posttest knowledge scores between the groups. To explore the mechanisms underlying the effect of the intervention on knowledge acquisition, mediation and moderation analyses were performed using PROCESS Models 4 and 1, respectively. In the mediation model, the change in 21st-century skills (posttest-pretest difference) was tested as a mediator. In the moderation model, academic achievement was examined as a moderator of the group-knowledge relationship. Both models controlled for academic achievement where applicable. Statistical significance was set at p \< .05, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported for all relevant estimates.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Artificial Intelligence Supported Case Analysis and Nursing Students
NCT07087288
Artificial Intelligence Supported Case Analysis on Nursing Education
NCT06443983
Increasing Midwifery Students' Awareness of Breast and Gynecological Cancers Using Creative Drama Method
NCT07073599
The Effect of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Preparation of Patient Education Material
NCT06520852
Nurses' Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence and Their Relationship With Critical Thinking Dispositions
NCT07134374
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
AIG
During the training session, students were given a detailed explanation of an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted case presentation structured according to the ERAS protocol. They were briefed on the data collection tools they would need to complete before and after the session. A convenient time was set, considering all participants' accessibility, and students were provided a link they could access from their mobile phones, tablets, or computers. Students participated in the AI-assisted case session online using this link.
During the training process, a case scenario developed by the researchers and optimized with AI was presented to students on a digital platform. The case encompassed the entire patient care process, from diagnosis to discharge, simulating a real-life clinical environment. On the AI-assisted platform, students followed the case flow step by step, actively participating by entering their own responses at each stage of the clinical decision-making process. The pla
Case-based learning (CBL)
During the training session, students were given a detailed explanation of an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted case presentation structured according to the ERAS protocol. They were briefed on the data collection tools they would need to complete before and after the session. A convenient time was set, considering all participants' accessibility, and students were provided a link they could access from their mobile phones, tablets, or computers. Students participated in the AI-assisted case session online using this link.
During the training process, a case scenario developed by the researchers and optimized with AI was presented to students on a digital platform. The case encompassed the entire patient care process, from diagnosis to discharge, simulating a real-life clinical environment. On the AI-assisted platform, students followed the case flow step by step, actively participating by entering their own responses at each stage of the clinical decision-making process. The plat
CG
Students in the control group received no additional interventions or AI-supported case training throughout the study. The control group was limited to theoretical and practical courses within the faculty's existing curriculum, conducted using traditional methods. Students in this group received no additional training through case-based learning, AI-supported visual materials, or digital platforms; they only utilized standard course content and routine lectures from their instructors. Thus, it was evaluated whether the differences between the experimental and control groups were due to the AI-supported case training and visual materials applied.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Case-based learning (CBL)
During the training session, students were given a detailed explanation of an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted case presentation structured according to the ERAS protocol. They were briefed on the data collection tools they would need to complete before and after the session. A convenient time was set, considering all participants' accessibility, and students were provided a link they could access from their mobile phones, tablets, or computers. Students participated in the AI-assisted case session online using this link.
During the training process, a case scenario developed by the researchers and optimized with AI was presented to students on a digital platform. The case encompassed the entire patient care process, from diagnosis to discharge, simulating a real-life clinical environment. On the AI-assisted platform, students followed the case flow step by step, actively participating by entering their own responses at each stage of the clinical decision-making process. The plat
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sakarya University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahsen Demirhan
PhD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sakarya University
Adapazarı, Sakarya, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
22.07.2025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.