Artificial Intelligence Assisted Teaching of Structured Nursing Care According to ERAS Protocol

NCT ID: NCT07183202

Last Updated: 2025-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-27

Study Completion Date

2025-07-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study provides an original contribution to the literature by structuring nursing care for gyneco-oncology patients according to the ERAS protocol and delivering it through AI-assisted, case-based education.

This randomized controlled, fully experimental study was conducted in the second semester of the 2024-2025 academic year with third-year students who had successfully completed the Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing course at the Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, at a state university located in western Turkey. Seventy students participated in the study and were assigned to either the AI-assisted case-based education group or the control group using block randomization. Data were collected using the ERAS Protocol Nursing Care Knowledge Test and the Multidimensional 21st Century Skills Scale. All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 27) and the PROCESS macro (Version 4.2) developed by Hayes. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic variables and baseline characteristics. Group equivalence at baseline was assessed using independent samples t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen's d and Cramér's V, as appropriate. To examine the effect of the intervention on 21st-century skills, a mixed-design ANOVA was performed with time (pretest, posttest) as the within-subjects factor and group (intervention, control) as the between-subjects factor. Partial eta squared (η²) was reported as a measure of effect size for within- and between-subjects effects. An independent samples t-test was also used to compare posttest knowledge scores between the groups. To explore the mechanisms underlying the effect of the intervention on knowledge acquisition, mediation and moderation analyses were performed using PROCESS Models 4 and 1, respectively. In the mediation model, the change in 21st-century skills (posttest-pretest difference) was tested as a mediator. In the moderation model, academic achievement was examined as a moderator of the group-knowledge relationship. Both models controlled for academic achievement where applicable. Statistical significance was set at p \< .05, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported for all relevant estimates.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

AI (Artificial Intelligence) Case-based Learning Nursing Students ERAS Education Nursing

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

AIG

During the training session, students were given a detailed explanation of an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted case presentation structured according to the ERAS protocol. They were briefed on the data collection tools they would need to complete before and after the session. A convenient time was set, considering all participants' accessibility, and students were provided a link they could access from their mobile phones, tablets, or computers. Students participated in the AI-assisted case session online using this link.

During the training process, a case scenario developed by the researchers and optimized with AI was presented to students on a digital platform. The case encompassed the entire patient care process, from diagnosis to discharge, simulating a real-life clinical environment. On the AI-assisted platform, students followed the case flow step by step, actively participating by entering their own responses at each stage of the clinical decision-making process. The pla

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Case-based learning (CBL)

Intervention Type OTHER

During the training session, students were given a detailed explanation of an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted case presentation structured according to the ERAS protocol. They were briefed on the data collection tools they would need to complete before and after the session. A convenient time was set, considering all participants' accessibility, and students were provided a link they could access from their mobile phones, tablets, or computers. Students participated in the AI-assisted case session online using this link.

During the training process, a case scenario developed by the researchers and optimized with AI was presented to students on a digital platform. The case encompassed the entire patient care process, from diagnosis to discharge, simulating a real-life clinical environment. On the AI-assisted platform, students followed the case flow step by step, actively participating by entering their own responses at each stage of the clinical decision-making process. The plat

CG

Students in the control group received no additional interventions or AI-supported case training throughout the study. The control group was limited to theoretical and practical courses within the faculty's existing curriculum, conducted using traditional methods. Students in this group received no additional training through case-based learning, AI-supported visual materials, or digital platforms; they only utilized standard course content and routine lectures from their instructors. Thus, it was evaluated whether the differences between the experimental and control groups were due to the AI-supported case training and visual materials applied.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Case-based learning (CBL)

During the training session, students were given a detailed explanation of an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted case presentation structured according to the ERAS protocol. They were briefed on the data collection tools they would need to complete before and after the session. A convenient time was set, considering all participants' accessibility, and students were provided a link they could access from their mobile phones, tablets, or computers. Students participated in the AI-assisted case session online using this link.

During the training process, a case scenario developed by the researchers and optimized with AI was presented to students on a digital platform. The case encompassed the entire patient care process, from diagnosis to discharge, simulating a real-life clinical environment. On the AI-assisted platform, students followed the case flow step by step, actively participating by entering their own responses at each stage of the clinical decision-making process. The plat

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

a) Successfully passing the Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing course, b) not having verbal or written communication problems, c) being an exchange student, d) having a mobile phone with internet connection, and e) being willing to give written informed consent before participating in the study.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sakarya University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahsen Demirhan

PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sakarya University

Adapazarı, Sakarya, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

22.07.2025

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

7E Model in Nursing Education
NCT06689306 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA