Effect of Low-Level Light Therapy on Ocular Surface Parameters in Patients Undergoing Femto-Lasik Surgery
NCT ID: NCT07181668
Last Updated: 2025-09-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
61 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-08-10
2025-07-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled trial, adult patients undergoing Femto-LASIK were assigned to receive either periocular LLLT (Eye-light® )or sham treatment before and after surgery. Tear film parameters and ocular surface symptoms were assessed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.
Results showed that patients treated with LLLT maintained stable tear volume and reported fewer ocular discomfort symptoms compared with controls, who experienced significant declines. No adverse events related to LLLT were observed.
These findings suggest that perioperative LLLT is a safe and well-tolerated approach that may help preserve tear film stability and improve postoperative comfort in Femto-LASIK patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Low-Level Light Therapy on Ocular Surface Parameters in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery
NCT07067294
Efficacy of Low-Level Light Therapy in Reducing Dry Eye in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery
NCT05754437
Low-level Light Therapy Versus Intense Pulsed Light to Prevent Iatrogenic Dry Eye Disease After Cataract Surgery
NCT07055022
Analysis of the Results of Intense Pulsed Light Treatment Previously to Laser Refractive Surgery
NCT05139511
Long-term (3 Months) Safety of Femtosecond-laser Assisted Cataract Surgery
NCT02023437
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Dry eye disease is a multifactorial condition characterized by tear film instability, ocular surface inflammation, and neurosensory abnormalities. It is among the most common complications after corneal refractive surgery, largely due to the transection of corneal nerves during flap creation and excimer laser ablation, which disrupts the lacrimal functional unit and reduces tear production. This can impair visual recovery and reduce patient satisfaction.
LLLT is a non-invasive photobiomodulation technique that delivers low-intensity, monochromatic red light (633 ± 10 nm) to periocular tissues. It has been shown to improve mitochondrial function, modulate inflammatory pathways, and enhance meibomian gland activity, with potential benefits in ocular surface disease. Its role in the perioperative management of DED after LASIK, however, has not been fully explored.
Eligible participants were consecutive adults (≥18 years) scheduled for Femto-LASIK. Exclusion criteria included pre-existing ocular surface disease or DED, prior ocular surgery, autoimmune disease, use of systemic medications associated with DED, and any intraoperative or postoperative complications that could interfere with evaluation. Both eyes of each patient were included in the analysis.
Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive either LLLT or sham treatment. LLLT was administered with the Eye-light® device (Espansione Marketing S.p.A., Italy) for 15 minutes one week before and one week after surgery. Sham-treated patients underwent the same procedure with less than 30% of the treatment power, ensuring masking. All surgeries were performed by experienced surgeons using standardized LASIK techniques under topical anesthesia, followed by a uniform postoperative regimen including topical antibiotics, corticosteroids, and preservative-free artificial tears.
Clinical assessments were performed at baseline (T0), 1 week postoperatively (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months (T3).
Parameters included:
Non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) Tear meniscus height (TMH) Lipid layer interferometry Schirmer I test Dry Eye Questionnaire-5 (DEQ-5)
The primary outcome was the preservation of tear volume and ocular surface parameters at 3 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included changes in patient-reported symptoms and tear film stability. Safety was evaluated by monitoring treatment-related adverse events and tolerability.
Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS (version 30.0). Non-parametric and parametric tests were applied as appropriate, with p \< 0.05 considered statistically significant. Sample size calculation ensured adequate power (\>0.99) to detect clinically meaningful effects.
A total of 61 patients were randomized, of whom 40 (80 eyes) completed the study (23 in the LLLT group, 17 in the sham group). Patients receiving LLLT showed preserved tear meniscus height, stable Schirmer test values, and unchanged DEQ-5 scores over 3 months, whereas the sham group demonstrated significant deterioration in these parameters. No significant effects were found for NIBUT or interferometry. No treatment-related adverse events were reported, and LLLT was well tolerated.
This is the first prospective randomized trial to evaluate perioperative LLLT in Femto-LASIK patients. The results suggest that LLLT may protect ocular surface health, preserve tear volume, and improve patient comfort after refractive surgery. These findings support further research to optimize treatment protocols and confirm long-term benefits
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LLLT Group
Participants in the LLLT group received periocular low-level light therapy (LLLT) using the Eye-light® device (Espansione Marketing S.p.A., Italy) for 15 minutes per session, one week before and one week after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (Femto-LASIK). The device delivers red light at 633 ± 10 nm through closed eyelids, targeting the periocular region and meibomian glands to support tear film stability and reduce ocular discomfort. All participants underwent standard Femto-LASIK surgery and received identical postoperative care, including topical antibiotics, corticosteroids, and preservative-free artificial tears. Of the 31 patients initially assigned to the LLLT group, 6 were lost to follow-up, leaving 23 patients (46 eyes) for the final analysis.
Low-Level Light Therapy
The intervention consists of non-invasive periocular photobiomodulation using the Eye-light® device (Espansione Marketing S.p.A., Italy), which delivers low-level monochromatic red light (633 ± 10 nm) through a specially designed mask. Participants receive two 15-minute sessions, one 7 days before and one 7 days after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (Femto-LASIK). The treatment is designed to stimulate meibomian gland activity, improve tear film stability, and reduce ocular surface inflammation. This protocol is unique compared to standard post-refractive surgery care because it targets cellular mitochondrial activity to enhance tissue repair and anti-inflammatory effects. It is non-pharmacological, non-contact, and well-tolerated, making it suitable for perioperative application. The light is delivered through closed eyelids, ensuring safety and comfort, and the device used is CE-marked for ophthalmic applications.
Sham Group
Participants in the Control group underwent a sham treatment using the same Eye-light® device with minimal energy (\<30% of the full therapeutic dose) for 15 minutes per session, also one week before and one week after surgery. This procedure mimicked LLLT without providing therapeutic light exposure. Postoperative care and clinical assessments were identical to the LLLT group. Of the 30 patients initially assigned to the Control group, 13 were lost at the follow up leaving 17 patients (34 eyes) for the final analysis.
Sham (No Treatment)
Participants in the Control group underwent the same procedural setup as the LLLT group, using the Eye-light® device (Espansione Marketing S.p.A., Italy). Instead of delivering therapeutic light energy, the device operated in demo mode, emitting less than 30% of the full treatment power. This configuration mimicked the visual and sensory aspects of a low-level light therapy session without producing biologically effective photobiomodulation. Sham treatment consisted of two 15-minute sessions, one 7 days before and one 7 days after Femto-LASIK. This design ensured masking of participants and investigators while preventing active therapeutic exposure in the control group.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Low-Level Light Therapy
The intervention consists of non-invasive periocular photobiomodulation using the Eye-light® device (Espansione Marketing S.p.A., Italy), which delivers low-level monochromatic red light (633 ± 10 nm) through a specially designed mask. Participants receive two 15-minute sessions, one 7 days before and one 7 days after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (Femto-LASIK). The treatment is designed to stimulate meibomian gland activity, improve tear film stability, and reduce ocular surface inflammation. This protocol is unique compared to standard post-refractive surgery care because it targets cellular mitochondrial activity to enhance tissue repair and anti-inflammatory effects. It is non-pharmacological, non-contact, and well-tolerated, making it suitable for perioperative application. The light is delivered through closed eyelids, ensuring safety and comfort, and the device used is CE-marked for ophthalmic applications.
Sham (No Treatment)
Participants in the Control group underwent the same procedural setup as the LLLT group, using the Eye-light® device (Espansione Marketing S.p.A., Italy). Instead of delivering therapeutic light energy, the device operated in demo mode, emitting less than 30% of the full treatment power. This configuration mimicked the visual and sensory aspects of a low-level light therapy session without producing biologically effective photobiomodulation. Sham treatment consisted of two 15-minute sessions, one 7 days before and one 7 days after Femto-LASIK. This design ensured masking of participants and investigators while preventing active therapeutic exposure in the control group.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for bilateral Femto-LASIK surgery for refractive error correction.
* Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
* Ability and willingness to comply with all study procedures and follow-up visits.
* Baseline ocular surface within normal limits (no pre-existing dry eye or ocular surface disease)
Exclusion Criteria
* History of ocular surgery in either eye.
* Presence of ocular comorbidities such as glaucoma, corneal dystrophies, or active ocular infections.
* Current or regular use of topical ocular treatments, including lubricants, corticosteroids, cyclosporine, or other drugs for DED or OSD.
* Use of instrumental therapies for ocular surface or tear film optimization (e.g., thermal pulsation, IPL).
* Systemic treatments known to influence tear production (e.g., diuretics, antihistamines, antidepressants, hormone replacement therapy).
* Autoimmune diseases affecting the eyes, including Sjögren's syndrome or rheumatoid arthritis.
* Any intraoperative or postoperative complications that could interfere with ocular surface assessment.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Timofte Zorila Mihaela Madalina
Principal investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa" Iași,
Iași, , Romania
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Grigore T. Popa n.54/29.07.24
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.