70 vs 110 Degree Side-cut Angles in Femtosecond LASIK

NCT ID: NCT03122535

Last Updated: 2021-05-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

115 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-10-07

Study Completion Date

2019-03-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare 70 and 110 degree side-cut angles on the same patient undergoing Femtosecond Laser-assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

LASIK has become the preferred corneal procedure to correct certain refractive errors. One of the major advancements in LASIK has been the introduction of Femtosecond Laser technology for flap creation. Several studies have compared microkeratome and femtosecond laser technology, showing superior accuracy and precision of flap dimensions in the latter.

The Femtosecond Laser technology provides different parameters and settings that can be changed according to the surgeon's preference. One of such parameters is the side-cut angle. Some of the most common side-cut angles used today include 45, 70, 90, and 110 degrees. Previous studies have reported on the visual outcomes of side-cut angles, but head to head comparisons are lacking. Currently, there are no studies comparing the safety and efficacy of the 70 and 110 side-cut angles in FS-LASIK. Information regarding the outcomes and complication rates between these side-cut angles will provide an objective measure that can be used when deciding which one is more suitable in FS-LASIK.

One angle will be performed on the right eye and the other on the left eye. The study will evaluate uncorrected visual acuity, best corrected visual acuity, intraoperative, and postoperative complications. Performing different side-cut angles on the same individual will allow a direct comparison of outcomes, minimizing confounding variables.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Operative Incision

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Each participant will be masked as to which angle of cut is used in which eye. Each patient will receive a 70 degree cut in one eye and a 110 degree cut in the fellow eye

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

FS-LASIK 70 degree side-cut angle

Each patient will be masked as to which angle of cut is used in which eye. Each patient will receive a 70 degree cut in one eye and a 110 degree cut in the fellow eye.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

FS-LASIK 70 degree side-cut angle

Intervention Type DEVICE

FS-LASIK surgical procedures will be performed according to the surgeons' standard practices. Patient will be masked as to the treatment they receive in either eye so as not to influence their subjective responses and visual measurements. Patients will be discontinued from the study if, on the day of surgery, both eyes cannot be randomized and operated as per protocol.

FS-LASIK 110 degree side-cut angle

Intervention Type DEVICE

FS-LASIK surgical procedures will be performed according to the surgeons' standard practices. Patient will be masked as to the treatment they receive in either eye so as not to influence their subjective responses and visual measurements. Patients will be discontinued from the study if, on the day of surgery, both eyes cannot be randomized and operated as per protocol.

FS-LASIK 110 degree side-cut angle

Each patient will be masked as to which angle of cut is used in which eye. Each patient will receive a 70 degree cut in one eye and a 110 degree cut in the fellow eye.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

FS-LASIK 70 degree side-cut angle

Intervention Type DEVICE

FS-LASIK surgical procedures will be performed according to the surgeons' standard practices. Patient will be masked as to the treatment they receive in either eye so as not to influence their subjective responses and visual measurements. Patients will be discontinued from the study if, on the day of surgery, both eyes cannot be randomized and operated as per protocol.

FS-LASIK 110 degree side-cut angle

Intervention Type DEVICE

FS-LASIK surgical procedures will be performed according to the surgeons' standard practices. Patient will be masked as to the treatment they receive in either eye so as not to influence their subjective responses and visual measurements. Patients will be discontinued from the study if, on the day of surgery, both eyes cannot be randomized and operated as per protocol.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

FS-LASIK 70 degree side-cut angle

FS-LASIK surgical procedures will be performed according to the surgeons' standard practices. Patient will be masked as to the treatment they receive in either eye so as not to influence their subjective responses and visual measurements. Patients will be discontinued from the study if, on the day of surgery, both eyes cannot be randomized and operated as per protocol.

Intervention Type DEVICE

FS-LASIK 110 degree side-cut angle

FS-LASIK surgical procedures will be performed according to the surgeons' standard practices. Patient will be masked as to the treatment they receive in either eye so as not to influence their subjective responses and visual measurements. Patients will be discontinued from the study if, on the day of surgery, both eyes cannot be randomized and operated as per protocol.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects who are deemed suitable candidates for bilateral LASIK will be considered eligible for participation in this study. Correction will be distance for both eyes.

Exclusion Criteria

* Selection will be consistent with current standard of care. Any patient that is not a suitable candidate for LASIK will not be included.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Utah

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mark Mifflin

Clinical Professor, Ophthalmology/Visual Sciences

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mark D Mifflin, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Utah Moran Eye Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Utah John A. Moran Eye Center - Midvalley Location

Murray, Utah, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB 74858

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.