Z8 OCT-controlled 2D vs 3D LASIK

NCT ID: NCT04426175

Last Updated: 2020-06-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

13 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-12-05

Study Completion Date

2020-04-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that OCT-guided 110 µm targeted flaps will result in accurate, predictable, and precise thickness flaps, with low complication rates when performed and compared using both 2D and 3D flap geometry applications and how it correlated to visual experience and quality of life responses during the early postoperative period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

It has been postulated that it is possible with the Ziemer Femtosecond LDV laser system to create reproducible flaps in terms of thickness and predictability. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that OCT-guided 110 µm targeted flaps will result in accurate, predictable, and precise thickness flaps, with low complication rates when performed and compared using both 2D and 3D flap geometry applications. Patient-reported outcomes are increasingly incorporated into clinical trials as they provide access to valuable information on the physical experience of the patient during and after the treatment. A questionnaire will therefore also be introduced in this study to evaluate how well self-reported pain, visual experience, and quality of life responses are correlated with flap geometries in both groups during the early postoperative period. The study holds direct medical benefit to the patient in this that they received an immediate improvement in his/her unaided vision. Moreover, the patient's participation contributes to the medical knowledge about the use of femtosecond lasers for refractive surgery, in particular in view of the use of intraoperative OCT visualization tools. The patients will gain access to the newest technology available for refractive surgery namely a low pulse energy high-frequency femtosecond laser.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myopia Astigmatism

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

2D LASIK

With the 2D method, the flap resection is created in a planar mode (xy-plane), without vertical cut, at the requested depth.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

2D and 3D cutting method using a low energy Femtosecond laser LDV Z8 for LASIK flap cutting

Intervention Type DEVICE

2D and 3D cutting methods were randomly used in same subjects

3D LASIK

With the 3D method, the flap resection is done in a three-dimensional mode, at the requested depth, with the requested diameter and the desired border (side cut) angle

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

2D and 3D cutting method using a low energy Femtosecond laser LDV Z8 for LASIK flap cutting

Intervention Type DEVICE

2D and 3D cutting methods were randomly used in same subjects

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

2D and 3D cutting method using a low energy Femtosecond laser LDV Z8 for LASIK flap cutting

2D and 3D cutting methods were randomly used in same subjects

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The recommended range of application for the correction of myopia is up to -8.00 D and for the correction of astigmatism up to 5.00 D.
* The limited for LASIK correction of myopia is up to -10.00 D and correction of astigmatism up to 6.00 D. If myopic astigmatism is to be corrected, the values for myopia and astigmatism must be added together.
* The recommended range for correction of hyperopia is up to 3.00 D. Up to 4.00 D is the range of limited application for hyperopia.
* Age ≥18 years with stable eyesight for over 12 months.

Exclusion Criteria

* preoperative corneal thickness less than 480 μm
* predicted stromal thickness under the flap after ablation of less than 250 μm
* chronic progressive corneal disease and forme fruste keratoconus
* surgery before the age of 18 years
* symptomatic cataract
* Glaucoma with a marked loss of visual field
* Exudative macular degeneration.
* Concurrent participation in another ophthalmological clinical study


* Undergone former eye surgery
* Contact lens wear within the two weeks prior to commencement of preoperative measurements
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zentrumsehstarke Hamburg

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stephan Linke, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Zentrumsehstarke Hamburg

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Zentrumsehstärke

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Huhtala A, Pietila J, Makinen P, Uusitalo H. Femtosecond lasers for laser in situ keratomileusis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar 7;10:393-404. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S99394. eCollection 2016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27022236 (View on PubMed)

Eldaly ZH, Abdelsalam MA, Hussein MS, Nassr MA. Comparison of Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Flap Morphology and Predictability by WaveLight FS200 Femtosecond Laser and Moria Microkeratome: An Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Study. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr;33(2):113-121. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2018.0035.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30977320 (View on PubMed)

Pajic B, Vastardis I, Pajic-Eggspuehler B, Gatzioufas Z, Hafezi F. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome-assisted flap creation for LASIK: a prospective, randomized, paired-eye study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep 22;8:1883-9. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S68124. eCollection 2014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25284975 (View on PubMed)

Tomita M, Chiba A, Matsuda J, Nawa Y. Evaluation of LASIK treatment with the Femto LDV in patients with corneal opacity. J Refract Surg. 2012 Jan;28(1):25-30. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20111213-01. Epub 2011 Dec 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22185466 (View on PubMed)

Pietila J, Huhtala A, Makinen P, Uusitalo H. Flap characteristics, predictability, and safety of the Ziemer FEMTO LDV femtosecond laser with the disposable suction ring for LASIK. Eye (Lond). 2014 Jan;28(1):66-71. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.244. Epub 2013 Nov 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24232315 (View on PubMed)

Pietila J, Huhtala A, Makinen P, Salmenhaara K, Uusitalo H. Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis flap creation with the three-dimensional, transportable Ziemer FEMTO LDV model Z6 I femtosecond laser. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov;92(7):650-5. doi: 10.1111/aos.12333. Epub 2013 Dec 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24373615 (View on PubMed)

Porela-Tiihonen S, Kaarniranta K, Kokki M, Purhonen S, Kokki H. A prospective study on postoperative pain after cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1429-35. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S47576. Epub 2013 Jul 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23885165 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CPFEM-0007-DE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.