Effect of Low-Level Light Therapy on Ocular Surface Parameters in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery
NCT ID: NCT07067294
Last Updated: 2026-01-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
98 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-01-08
2025-09-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study enrolled adult patients scheduled for phacoemulsification, with baseline evidence of mild-to-moderate ocular surface disease. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either LLLT via a polychromatic light-emitting mask (Eye-light® ) or a sham device, administered one week before and one week after surgery. The LLLT protocol is designed to photobiomodulate eyelid and periocular tissues to enhance meibomian gland function and reduce subclinical inflammation.
Clinical assessments were conducted at baseline, one week, and six months postoperatively. The primary endpoint was the change in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score at one and six months. Secondary endpoints included tear film stability (TBUT), Schirmer I test, corneal staining, tear osmolarity, and tear inflammatory and reparative biomarkers. The study also evaluated the safety and tolerability of the LLLT intervention.
This is the first prospective study assessing the role of perioperative LLLT in mitigating post-cataract ocular surface disease in consecutive patients. The findings may support the integration of LLLT in perioperative ocular surface management protocols.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Low-Level Light Therapy on Ocular Surface Parameters in Patients Undergoing Femto-Lasik Surgery
NCT07181668
Efficacy of Low-Level Light Therapy in Reducing Dry Eye in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery
NCT05754437
Low-level Light Therapy Versus Intense Pulsed Light to Prevent Iatrogenic Dry Eye Disease After Cataract Surgery
NCT07055022
Light Filters in Intraocular Lenses (IOLs) and Its Influence on Colour and Contrast Vision.
NCT00612729
The Pattern of Dry Eye Disease After Cataract Surgery
NCT06298890
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Dry eye disease is a multifactorial disorder characterized by tear film instability and ocular surface inflammation. Cataract surgery is known to transiently exacerbate or precipitate DED through mechanisms including disruption of corneal nerves, exposure to surgical light and irrigation, and postoperative medication use. This can impair visual rehabilitation and reduce patient satisfaction with surgical outcomes, particularly in individuals with pre-existing ocular surface dysfunction.
LLLT is a non-invasive photobiomodulation technique that delivers low-intensity, polychromatic red and near-infrared light to target mitochondrial cytochromes and promote cellular activity. Its application in ophthalmology has shown potential to improve meibomian gland function, enhance tear film stability, and downregulate inflammatory cytokines on the ocular surface. However, its perioperative utility in cataract surgery has not been formally evaluated.
Eligible participants included consecutive adults (≥18 years) scheduled for phacoemulsification. Key exclusion criteria were a prior diagnosis of ocular surface disease (OSD) or dry eye disease (DED), any history of ocular surgery in either eye, ocular comorbidities, and the current or regular use of topical or instrumental ocular treatments.
Participants were randomized into two groups: the intervention group received LLLT using the Eye-light® device (Espansione Group, Italy), and the control group received sham treatment with an identical, inactive device. Treatments were administered one week before and one week after surgery. The mask delivers light in the 600-1200 nm range through closed eyelids for 15 minutes per session, targeting the periocular region and meibomian glands.
Clinical assessments were performed at baseline (T0), one week postoperatively (T1), one month postoperatively (T2), and six months postoperatively (T3) and included:
* Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)
* Non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT)
* Schirmer I test (SIT)
* Corneal fluorescein staining (Oxford grading)
* Tear Osmolarity
* Tear Inflammatory and reparative biomarkers
The primary outcome was the change in OSDI score from baseline to 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included all objective ocular surface parameters. Safety was evaluated by monitoring treatment-emergent adverse events and assessing patient tolerability of the device.
All surgeries were performed by the same experienced surgeon using standard microincisional phacoemulsification technique. Only eyes without significant intraoperative or postoperative complications were included in the final analysis.
Postoperative therapy was identical for all patients and included a combination of topical dexamethasone and netilmicin for 1 week, followed by tapering dexamethasone alone over 2 additional weeks; topical ketorolac tapered over 3 weeks; and preservative-free artificial tears (cross-linked hyaluronic acid, trehalose, sterilamine in liposomes) administered three times daily for 6 months.
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 30.0.0.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).. The normality of data was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test. For normally distributed variables, repeated measures ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post-hoc tests were used. For non-normally distributed data, the Friedman test with Dunn's correction was applied. A p-value \< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
This is the first prospective study to investigate LLLT in the perioperative setting of cataract surgery within consecutive patients. The findings aim to provide evidence for integrating non-pharmacological interventions in ocular surface optimization before and after cataract surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LLLT Group
A total of 50 patients were randomized to the low-level light therapy (LLLT) group. All participants underwent standard cataract surgery and received two sessions of periocular LLLT using the Eye-light® device (Espansione Group, Italy): one session one week before surgery and another one week after. The treatment was delivered through a wearable mask emitting polychromatic red and near-infrared light, targeting the eyelids and meibomian glands.
Of the 50 randomized patients, 3 were lost to follow-up and 2 discontinued the intervention due to postoperative complications. Ultimately, 45 patients completed the full study protocol and were included in the final analysis. Ocular surface assessments were performed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months postoperatively to evaluate the effects of LLLT on tear film quality, inflammation, and meibomian gland function.
Low-Level Light Therapy
The intervention consists of non-invasive periocular photobiomodulation using the Eye-light® device (Espansione Group, Italy), which delivers low-level polychromatic red and near-infrared light (600-1200 nm) through a specially designed mask. Participants receive two 15-minute sessions, one 7 days before and one 7 days after cataract surgery.
The treatment is designed to stimulate meibomian gland activity, improve tear film stability, reduce ocular surface inflammation.
This protocol is unique compared to standard treatments for dry eye because it targets cellular mitochondrial activity to enhance tissue repair and anti-inflammatory effects. It is non-pharmacological, non-contact, and well-tolerated, making it suitable for perioperative application. The light is delivered through closed eyelids, ensuring safety and comfort, and the device used is CE-marked for ophthalmic applications.
Sham Group
A total of 48 patients were randomized to the sham group. These participants underwent standard cataract surgery and received two perioperative sessions of a simulated light-based treatment, one administered one week before and one week after surgery. The procedure mimicked the experience of the active LLLT intervention, using the same mask device without activation of the therapeutic light emission.
Of the 48 enrolled participants, 2 were lost to follow-up and 2 discontinued due to postoperative complications. A total of 44 patients completed the full protocol and were included in the final analysis. Clinical assessments were conducted at the same time points as the active treatment group-baseline, 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months postoperatively-to evaluate tear film function, ocular surface condition, and meibomian gland performance.
Sham (No Treatment)
Sham-treated controls underwent the same procedural setup as the active treatment group, using the Eye-light® device (Espansione Group, Italy). However, instead of delivering therapeutic levels of light energy, the device operated in demo light mode, emitting less than 30% of the full treatment power. This setting simulated the visual and sensory experience of a low-level light therapy (LLLT) session without delivering biologically effective photobiomodulation.
The sham intervention included two 15-minute sessions: one administered 7 days before cataract surgery and one 7 days after. This approach allowed for masking of participants and investigators to minimize bias, while ensuring that patients in the control group received no active therapeutic exposure.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Low-Level Light Therapy
The intervention consists of non-invasive periocular photobiomodulation using the Eye-light® device (Espansione Group, Italy), which delivers low-level polychromatic red and near-infrared light (600-1200 nm) through a specially designed mask. Participants receive two 15-minute sessions, one 7 days before and one 7 days after cataract surgery.
The treatment is designed to stimulate meibomian gland activity, improve tear film stability, reduce ocular surface inflammation.
This protocol is unique compared to standard treatments for dry eye because it targets cellular mitochondrial activity to enhance tissue repair and anti-inflammatory effects. It is non-pharmacological, non-contact, and well-tolerated, making it suitable for perioperative application. The light is delivered through closed eyelids, ensuring safety and comfort, and the device used is CE-marked for ophthalmic applications.
Sham (No Treatment)
Sham-treated controls underwent the same procedural setup as the active treatment group, using the Eye-light® device (Espansione Group, Italy). However, instead of delivering therapeutic levels of light energy, the device operated in demo light mode, emitting less than 30% of the full treatment power. This setting simulated the visual and sensory experience of a low-level light therapy (LLLT) session without delivering biologically effective photobiomodulation.
The sham intervention included two 15-minute sessions: one administered 7 days before cataract surgery and one 7 days after. This approach allowed for masking of participants and investigators to minimize bias, while ensuring that patients in the control group received no active therapeutic exposure.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for routine phacoemulsification cataract surgery.
* Provided written informed consent and agreed to attend all follow-up visits.
Exclusion Criteria
* History of ocular surgery in either eye.
* Presence of ocular comorbidities (e.g., glaucoma, uveitis, corneal dystrophies).
* Current or regular use of topical ocular treatments such as lubricants, corticosteroids, or cyclosporine.
* Ongoing or recent instrumental therapies or oral supplements for OSD or DED.
* Use of systemic medications known to be associated with DED (e.g., diuretics, antidepressants, antihistamines, hormone replacement therapy).
* History of autoimmune diseases (e.g., Sjögren's syndrome).
* Regular contact lens wear.
* Any intraoperative or postoperative complications that could interfere with ocular surface evaluation.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Timofte Zorila Mihaela Madalina
Dr
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa" Iași
Iași, , Romania
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Timofte-Zorila MM, Lixi F, Vlas N, Troisi M, Ozkan G, Pavel-Tanasa M, Istrate S, Preda C, Coco G, Namazbayeva A, Giannaccare G, Branisteanu DC. Effect of Low-Level Light Therapy on Ocular Surface Parameters in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery: A Prospective Double-Masked Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Ophthalmol Ther. 2025 Oct;14(10):2557-2569. doi: 10.1007/s40123-025-01228-6. Epub 2025 Aug 24.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Grigore T. Popa n.54/290724
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.