Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
49 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-03-01
2023-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
An Evaluation of LASIK, SMILE and PRK Surgery in Physicians
NCT02576483
The Role of Psychosocial and Other Quality of Life Parameters in Evaluating Functional Changes Prior to and Following Laser In-situ Keratomileusis (LASIK)Changes Laser In-situ Keratomileusis (LASIK)
NCT00344604
Patients' Satisfaction After LASIK
NCT04109040
Patient Satisfaction in Post-LASIK Patients With Presbyopia-Correcting IOLs vs. Post-Lasik Patients With Monofocal IOLs
NCT04134507
Patient Reported Outcomes With LASIK: PROWL-2
NCT01655420
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Quality of Vision after LASIK surgery
Questionnaire
Patient Quality of Life andVision after LASIK Surgery
Patient questionnaire
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Patient Quality of Life andVision after LASIK Surgery
Patient questionnaire
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Have the ability to give informed consent.
* Speak and read English fluently.
* Have not previously had any form of refractive surgery, including prior LASIK or cataract surgery.
* May benefit from increased spectacle independence.
* Have been determined to be a good candidate for the LASIK procedure based on the investigator's assessment of medical and ophthalmic health, general cognitive function, and physical and social limitations.
* Have a treatment target of bilateral emmetropia.
* Express willingness and potential ability to return for all follow-up examinations through the 12-month follow-up exam under the care of the treating investigator.
* Are not enrolled in any other research study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with excessively thin corneas.
* Patients with topographic evidence of keratoconus.
* Patients with ectactic eye disorders.
* Patients with autoimmune diseases.
* Patients who are pregnant or nursing.
21 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Edward E. Manche
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Edward E. Manche
Professor of Ophthalmology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Edward E Manche, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Stanford University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Stanford Eye Laser Center
Palo Alto, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
30301
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.