Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
210 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-01-07
2027-01-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This research focuses on defining norms for tests to assess spatial neglect. The norms correspond to the results obtained in a population free of any disorder that could have an impact on test performance. These results can vary in a normal, non-pathological way, with certain parameters such as age, sex, laterality or level of education. Defining these norms in healthy volunteers is therefore essential for interpreting results in patients suspected of spatial neglect, and in particular for defining pathological thresholds above which the diagnosis of spatial neglect can be retained.
To answer the research question, we plan to include 210 people with no central neurological disease (stroke, epilepsy and multiple sclerosis in particular), in a single-center study in the neurovascular department of the Raymond-Poincaré hospital (Garches). The 210 subjects will be divided into 10-year age groups, from 20 to 89 years, with the recruitment of 30 participants per age group (15 men and 15 women): 20-29 years, 30-39 years, 40-49 years, 50-59 years, 60-69 years, 70-79 years, 80-89 years.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Disconnection and Unilateral Spatial Neglect
NCT05268159
Assessment of LF-rTMS in Patients With Visual Neglect
NCT06050408
Multisensory Integration and Cognitive Awareness in Post-Stroke Unilateral Spatial Neglect
NCT06690125
Memory for Action in Neurological Patients
NCT02844855
Cognitive Function Assessment in Patients With Focal Brain Injury
NCT04182087
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the case of personal, motor and tactile neglect, these three components are difficult to separate. A patient's ability to indicate blindly, by tactile exploration, the middle of a ruler, or to explore by touch different targets placed in front of him/her, should, after standardization, enable exploration of these last two types of neglect. A simplified version of the Comb and Razor Test should enable assessment of personal and motor neglect.
The aim of this study is to establish mean scores for healthy French-speaking volunteers without central neurological disease on different spatial neglect assessment tests according to their age, sex and level of professional qualification, using French-translated instructions for taking and scoring the tests.
Healthy volunteers with no known history of stroke or cognitive impairment will be included prospectively in the neurovascular department of the Raymond-Poincaré hospital in Garches. We aim to recruit 30 subjects (15 men and 15 women) in 10-year age groups (20 to 29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, 70 to 79 and 80 to 89), i.e. 210 subjects.
The significance threshold will be defined at 0.05. Statistical analyses will be performed using Rstudio software.
Qualitative variables will be described by their numbers and percentages, and quantitative variables by their means, standard deviations, minimums, maximums, as well as their medians and interquartile ranges (25th percentile - 75th percentile).
To identify the association between the variables (age, gender, level of qualification and laterality) and the metrics relating to the results of the following tests (Apples cancellation test, Comb and razor test, Peg test and Ruler blind bisection test) and their completion times, a linear regression will be conducted. The variables to be explained will be the metrics relating to the results of the following tests (Apple test, Comb and razor test, Plot test and Ruler bisection test) and their completion times. Explanatory variables will be age, gender, level of qualification, hand used and laterality.
If no significant association is found between the explanatory variables and the metrics relating to test results and completion times, a mean score with its 95% confidence interval will be estimated.
If there is a significant association between the explanatory variables and the metrics relating to the test results and their completion times, taking into account the characteristics of the healthy volunteers, a mean score for the metrics associated with its 95% confidence interval will be estimated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
group
Neuropsychological assessment tests for spatial neglect
Standardized administration of four paper-and-pencil tests designed to assess different forms of spatial neglect:
* Apples Cancellation Test (Birmingham Cognitive Screen) for egocentric and allocentric neglect,
* Simplified Comb and Razor Test for personal and motor neglect,
* Line Bisection Test (30 cm ruler, blind version) for tactile neglect,
* Dot Test for visual exploration.
The purpose is to establish normative reference scores in healthy French-speaking adults according to age, sex, and professional qualification. No therapeutic intervention or patient population is involved.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Neuropsychological assessment tests for spatial neglect
Standardized administration of four paper-and-pencil tests designed to assess different forms of spatial neglect:
* Apples Cancellation Test (Birmingham Cognitive Screen) for egocentric and allocentric neglect,
* Simplified Comb and Razor Test for personal and motor neglect,
* Line Bisection Test (30 cm ruler, blind version) for tactile neglect,
* Dot Test for visual exploration.
The purpose is to establish normative reference scores in healthy French-speaking adults according to age, sex, and professional qualification. No therapeutic intervention or patient population is involved.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Aged between 20 and 89 years
3. Affiliated with a health insurance scheme
4. French-speaking
5. Has freely and knowingly expressed their non-opposition
Exclusion Criteria
2. Medical interview suggesting past central nervous system involvement: history of episodes such as sensorimotor deficits, dysarthria, aphasia, blurred or double vision, or positive symptoms such as visual or sensory hallucinations (e.g., paresthesias).
3. Significant visual impairment - as judged by the examiner - in near vision despite correction, or monocular blindness. Specifically, inability to distinguish the targets with gaps in the example (pre-test) of the Apples Cancellation Test.
4. Abnormal neurological examination:
1. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score \> 0
2. Pyramidal reflex syndrome (hyperactive deep tendon reflexes with extended reflexogenic zones and spread).
5. Use of substances (alcohol or drugs) within 24 hours prior to the assessment.
6. Presence of cognitive or psychiatric disorders, assessed during the inclusion interview and neurological examination, at the examiner's discretion.
7. Language barrier or aphasia, assessed during the inclusion interview and neurological examination, at the examiner's discretion.
8. Participant under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship, or legal safeguard).
20 Years
89 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Raymond Poincarré
Garche, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
APHP250520
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.