Cognitive Assessment for Stroke Patients: Reproductibility and Validity Study

NCT ID: NCT01904799

Last Updated: 2026-02-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

263 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-02

Study Completion Date

2019-03-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

After a CVA, all of the cognitive functions can be affected and analysed, but the presence of a language disorder may considerably hamper the evaluation of other functions.

The battery of rapid tests to screen for and quantify cognitive disorders, including the MMSE, the MOCA, the R-CAMCOG or the RBANS, are not suitable for aphasic patients because they contain items with a strictly verbal response. Because of this, inexperienced doctors cannot evaluate higher functions (other than language) of aphasics in routine practice. For the same reason, aphasics are regularly excluded from post-cva therapeutic protocols, whether or not the trial bears on the evolution of cognitive functions.

Nonetheless, it is possible to evaluate, at least roughly, all of the cognitive functions without resorting to language.

The investigator have developed , from validated tests and classical clinical manoeuvers, the Cognitive Assessment for Stroke Patients (CASP) :

* for the rapid screening (less than 15 minutes) and quantification of post-cva cognitive disorders (6 functions: language, apraxia, short-term memory, temporal orientation, impaired spatial/visio-construction and executive functions);
* the CASP can be used in most patients, including those with severe disorders of expression and moderate problems with comprehension, The format of these tests has been adapted so that severe disorders of expression (essentially left-hemisphere CVA), and left spatial impairment (right-hemisphere CVA) do not affect the ability to take the test. Its validity in terms of appearance and content were verified in 2011.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cognitive Assessment

Group Type OTHER

Cognitive Assessment test

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cognitive Assessment test

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

For CVA patients

* patients hospitalised in rehabilitation after a first recent hemispheric CVA (less than 6 weeks) ;
* aged \> 18;
* absence of severe disorders of oral comprehension (BDAE aphasia severity score \>2 for comprehension);
* whatever the severity of oral expression disorders;
* who have been given clear written and oral information, and after the doctor has verified their ability to understand the protocol.

For " Control " patients (to evaluate divergent validity)

* patients hospitalised in rehabilitation units or geriatrics taking part in this study;
* aged \> 18.

Exclusion Criteria

For CVA patients

* patients who do not speak French;
* cognitive disorders known before the CVA;
* psychotic disorders known before the CVA;
* major visual disorders incompatible with reading, known before the CVA.

For " Control " patients (to evaluate divergent validity)

* patients who do not speak French;
* cognitive disorders known before the CVA;
* psychotic disorders known before the CVA;
* major visual disorders incompatible with reading, known before the CVA.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Dijon

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Benaim C, Wauquiez G, Perennou D, Piscicelli C, Lucas-Pineau B, Bonnin-Koang HY, Vuadens P, Binquet C, Bourredjem A, Devilliers H. Cognitive assessment scale for stroke patients (CASP): A multicentric validation study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 May;65(3):101594. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101594. Epub 2021 Nov 17.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34687958 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Benaim PHRC N 2012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Studying Cognition in SPG4
NCT03104088 COMPLETED
Neural Correlates of Intern Speech
NCT02830100 TERMINATED NA