Cognitive Assessment for Stroke Patients: Reproductibility and Validity Study
NCT ID: NCT01904799
Last Updated: 2026-02-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
263 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-01-02
2019-03-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The battery of rapid tests to screen for and quantify cognitive disorders, including the MMSE, the MOCA, the R-CAMCOG or the RBANS, are not suitable for aphasic patients because they contain items with a strictly verbal response. Because of this, inexperienced doctors cannot evaluate higher functions (other than language) of aphasics in routine practice. For the same reason, aphasics are regularly excluded from post-cva therapeutic protocols, whether or not the trial bears on the evolution of cognitive functions.
Nonetheless, it is possible to evaluate, at least roughly, all of the cognitive functions without resorting to language.
The investigator have developed , from validated tests and classical clinical manoeuvers, the Cognitive Assessment for Stroke Patients (CASP) :
* for the rapid screening (less than 15 minutes) and quantification of post-cva cognitive disorders (6 functions: language, apraxia, short-term memory, temporal orientation, impaired spatial/visio-construction and executive functions);
* the CASP can be used in most patients, including those with severe disorders of expression and moderate problems with comprehension, The format of these tests has been adapted so that severe disorders of expression (essentially left-hemisphere CVA), and left spatial impairment (right-hemisphere CVA) do not affect the ability to take the test. Its validity in terms of appearance and content were verified in 2011.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cognitive Control of Language
NCT03124173
Standardization of Spatial Neglect Assessment Tests
NCT07145970
Cognitive Function Assessment in Patients With Focal Brain Injury
NCT04182087
Establishing the Language Network With Independent Component Analysis of Resting State MRI
NCT02577757
Neural and Cognitive Correlates of Pragmatic Abilities
NCT06297044
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cognitive Assessment
Cognitive Assessment test
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cognitive Assessment test
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* patients hospitalised in rehabilitation after a first recent hemispheric CVA (less than 6 weeks) ;
* aged \> 18;
* absence of severe disorders of oral comprehension (BDAE aphasia severity score \>2 for comprehension);
* whatever the severity of oral expression disorders;
* who have been given clear written and oral information, and after the doctor has verified their ability to understand the protocol.
For " Control " patients (to evaluate divergent validity)
* patients hospitalised in rehabilitation units or geriatrics taking part in this study;
* aged \> 18.
Exclusion Criteria
* patients who do not speak French;
* cognitive disorders known before the CVA;
* psychotic disorders known before the CVA;
* major visual disorders incompatible with reading, known before the CVA.
For " Control " patients (to evaluate divergent validity)
* patients who do not speak French;
* cognitive disorders known before the CVA;
* psychotic disorders known before the CVA;
* major visual disorders incompatible with reading, known before the CVA.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU de Dijon
Dijon, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Benaim C, Wauquiez G, Perennou D, Piscicelli C, Lucas-Pineau B, Bonnin-Koang HY, Vuadens P, Binquet C, Bourredjem A, Devilliers H. Cognitive assessment scale for stroke patients (CASP): A multicentric validation study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 May;65(3):101594. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101594. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Benaim PHRC N 2012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.