BIA-Guided vs. Conventional Fluid Resuscitation in ICU Patients

NCT ID: NCT07142083

Last Updated: 2025-09-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-15

Study Completion Date

2026-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this study aimed to compare bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)-guided fluid resuscitation with conventional fluid management strategies in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) following major surgery. The primary objective is to evaluate whether BIA-guided fluid therapy reduces 28-day mortality by optimizing fluid balance and preventing volume-related complications. Secondary outcomes include cumulative fluid balance, ICU and hospital length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and need for vasopressor or inotropic support. This study is expected to provide evidence for the clinical utility and applicability of BIA in guiding postoperative fluid therapy in critically ill patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Fluid resuscitation plays a critical role in the perioperative care of patients undergoing major surgery.

Traditionally, fluid therapy decisions in the intensive care unit (ICU) have relied on static clinical parameters, which may not always reflect the patient's actual volume status. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) offers a noninvasive and dynamic assessment of hydration status, enabling more precise fluid management tailored to individual needs. This prospective, randomized controlled study aims to compare BIA-guided fluid resuscitation with conventional fluid management strategies in postoperative ICU patients. A total of 80 adult patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomized into two groups. Group 1 will receive standard fluid therapy based on clinical evaluation, including heart rate, blood pressure, urine output, passive leg raising test, and vena cava ultrasound assessment. Group 2 will undergo BIA measurements at 0, 12, 24, and 48 hours post-ICU admission to guide fluid management according to hydration status (dehydrated, euvolemic, or hypervolemic). The primary outcome is 28-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes include cumulative fluid balance, ICU and hospital length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and need for vasopressors or inotropic agents. By evaluating clinical outcomes between the two approaches, this study seeks to determine whether BIA-guided fluid management offers a clinically meaningful advantage in postoperative critical care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fluid and Electrolyte Imbalance Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A computer-generated block randomization list will be created using an online randomization tool by a researcher who is not involved in patient treatment or follow-up. Patients will be assigned to one of two groups (BIA-guided fluid management or conventional fluid therapy) based on sealed opaque envelopes prepared in advance according to the randomization sequence.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors
To preserve the integrity of the study results, group assignments (BIA-guided fluid resuscitation vs. conventional fluid resuscitation) were concealed from the clinical staff involved in patient care and data collection. In addition, the investigators responsible for evaluating the primary and secondary outcomes (outcome assessors) were blinded to group allocation. Prior to participation, all patients or their legal representatives were thoroughly informed about the study's purpose, the nature of the two fluid management strategies, the randomization process, and the blinding of group information. Informed consent was obtained after ensuring full understanding of the methodology, including the confidentiality of group assignments.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

BIA-Guided Fluid Therapy

Patients in this group will receive postoperative fluid therapy guided by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) using the Body Composition Monitor (BCM) device. Daily fluid decisions will be based on measurements such as Extracellular water (ECW)/ Total body water (TBW) and phase angle.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BCM)

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Body Composition Monitor (BCM) device will be used to perform daily bioelectrical impedance measurements to guide fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients after major surgery. Measurements include extracellular water, intracellular water, total body water, and phase angle. The results will be used to tailor fluid therapy.

Conventional Fluid Therapy

Patients in this group will receive conventional fluid management based on routine clinical parameters, including vital signs, urine output, physical examination, and laboratory values. No bioelectrical impedance analysis will be performed in this group.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Fluid Management

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients in this group will receive fluid therapy based on standard clinical parameters including blood pressure, heart rate, urine output, laboratory values, and physical examination. No bioelectrical impedance measurement will be performed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BCM)

The Body Composition Monitor (BCM) device will be used to perform daily bioelectrical impedance measurements to guide fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients after major surgery. Measurements include extracellular water, intracellular water, total body water, and phase angle. The results will be used to tailor fluid therapy.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional Fluid Management

Patients in this group will receive fluid therapy based on standard clinical parameters including blood pressure, heart rate, urine output, laboratory values, and physical examination. No bioelectrical impedance measurement will be performed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Undergoing major surgery under general anesthesia(Major surgery defined as: vascular clamping or organ ischemia, intraoperative blood loss \>1000 mL, need for \>10 mcg/min norepinephrine infusion, surgery duration \>4 hours, or requirement for perioperative blood transfusion)
* Admission to the intensive care unit (CU) after surgery
* Informed consent obtained

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal to participate or failure to provide informed consent
* Undergoing laparoscopic or emergency surgery
* Severe major organ dysfunction:Acute kidney injury stage 2 or 3 (KDIGO 2012) • Acute or chronic liver failure (ALT \>3x or Child A-C cirrhosis
* Conditions preventing accurate BIA measurement: • Limb amputation • Metallic cardiac or joint prostheses • Pacemakers or intracardiac stents
* Body mass index \>35 kg/m or \< 18 kg/m
* Contraindications to lactated Ringer's solution (e.g. hypercalcemia, increased intracranial pressure)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ondokuz Mayıs University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fatma ULGER

Ondokuz Mayıs University

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fatma Ülger

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ondokuz Mayıs University

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Kübra Tabur

Role: CONTACT

+905396067171

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chung YJ, Kim EY. Usefulness of bioelectrical impedance analysis and ECW ratio as a guidance for fluid management in critically ill patients after operation. Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 9;11(1):12168. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91819-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34108597 (View on PubMed)

Myatchin I, Abraham P, Malbrain MLNG. Bio-electrical impedance analysis in critically ill patients: are we ready for prime time? J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Jun;34(3):401-410. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00439-0. Epub 2019 Dec 5. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31808061 (View on PubMed)

Wang K, Sun SL, Wang XY, Chu CN, Duan ZH, Yang C, Liu BC, Ding WW, Li WQ, Li JS. Bioelectrical impedance analysis-guided fluid management promotes primary fascial closure after open abdomen: a randomized controlled trial. Mil Med Res. 2021 Jun 7;8(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40779-021-00329-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34099065 (View on PubMed)

Basso F, Berdin G, Virzi GM, Mason G, Piccinni P, Day S, Cruz DN, Wjewodzka M, Giuliani A, Brendolan A, Ronco C. Fluid management in the intensive care unit: bioelectrical impedance vector analysis as a tool to assess hydration status and optimal fluid balance in critically ill patients. Blood Purif. 2013;36(3-4):192-9. doi: 10.1159/000356366. Epub 2013 Dec 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24496190 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BIA2024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

VExUS-guided Fluid Management in the ICU
NCT07291778 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA