Parent Child Interaction Therapy vs Conventional Parent Led Therapy in Down Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT07128810
Last Updated: 2025-08-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
16 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-03-15
2025-05-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Receptive Language Intervention vs Individual Therapy for Preschool Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder.
NCT06927518
Efficacy of AAC for Functional Communication
NCT04583332
Comparison of ABLLS-R and Portage Guide in the Development of Receptive Language Skills Autism Spectrum Disorder.
NCT06292520
Comparative Effects of Play Based Therapy and Functional Communication Training in Speech-language Delayed Children
NCT05749315
Providing Speech Therapy Awareness in Private Schools
NCT04505696
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There are significant language delays that are observed among Down syndrome children that can affect their communication ability. The children with Down syndrome typically have a unique language profile in which they have strength in the receptive vocabulary, but show weakness in their expressive language and depth of word knowledge. These children often tend to have more challenges in phonology, morphology, and syntax, whereas the use of language that includes pragmatics are less impaired, but they are still weaker comparatively to the typical developing children.
Children with Down syndrome commonly experience language disorders that affect both expressive and receptive abilities. The language management is essential in the early intervention of Children with Down Syndrome that focuses on many factors, including language therapy that enhances vocabulary and expression. engaging parents as it is vital in order to educate them and provide supportive techniques that can lead to better outcomes.
There are Two prominent interventions for language problems are Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) and Clinician-Directed Therapy (CDT). The main focus of PCIT is to enhance the quality of the parent-child relationship and improving behavioral interactions through structured coaching. The aim of this method to create a more supportive and engaging environment for the child's language development. Where as comparatively CDT is direct therapist-led sessions that are designed to target specific language skills based on structured activities and exercises.
PCIT is structured, behavior-change intervention for young children between the ages of 2 and 7 years helping parents adopt less directive, positively engaging approaches that may improve parent-reported child communication skills. PCIT includes two stages; the first one is Child-Directed Interaction (CDI) for enhancing positive interactions and reinforcing desired behaviors, while the second stage is based on effective discipline strategies, Parent- Directed Interaction (PDI). From recent evidence it was reported that parent interaction skills and children's language the outcomes are significantly improved in post PCIT cases.
The Child-Directed Interaction (CDI) phase of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy focuses on building positive relationships, mainly for children with delayed language development. In this phase, parents engage in child-led play, using PRIDE skills like reflecting their child's phrases and providing descriptive language to positively enhance communication and reduce control. The Parent-Directed Interaction phase then shifts to teaching parents effective behavior management strategies. This includes setting clear expectations, using consistent discipline, and applying tools like timeouts and positive reinforcement.
Parents practice these techniques during therapy sessions, receiving feedback through video analysis, which helps them refine their approach and build confidence. As the interactions become more complex, the therapist's support gradually lessens, allowing parents to independently apply what they've learned.
In contrast conventional parent-mediated therapy is done in unstructured environment in which parents are active agents in the therapeutic strategies to enhance their child's communications and social skills. This approach equips parents with the competency to facilitate learning during daily interactions, which in turn helps the child achieve better developmental outcomes.
This parent-mediated therapy efficiently trains parents to make use of techniques that will contribute to the development of impaired children's language. Research has shown the influence of this strategy on receptive and expressive language, implying that a long-lasting effect can be accounted for in these studies of such interventions over some time.
Comparing the effects of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy with conventional parent-led therapy for managing language disorders in children with Down Syndrome will help optimize the intervention strategies. PCIT is more systematic and evidence-based, focusing on enhancing parent-child interactions through specific phases that have been shown to improve communication skills and behavioral outcomes. Conventional parent-led therapies provide flexible, individualized techniques for vocabulary and sentence structure building through daily interactions. The two methods are compared to determine which one will more effectively support language development, taking into account the structured framework of PCIT and the adaptability of traditional therapies. This comparison is crucial for clinical practice and will help guide families in selecting the intervention that best meets their child's specific needs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Parent Child Interaction Therapy
Parent Child Interaction Therapy
Parent was trained in a structured way during two phases of PCIT that are Phase 1: Child Directed Intervention and Phase 2: Parent Directed Intervention to encourage Language Development with frequency of sessions as 12 sessions; minimum 30 mins each day, 3x per week.
Conventional Parent Led Therapy
Conventional Parent Led Therapy
Parent was trained in an unstructured way by using different language development strategies (Imitation, Focused Stimulations, Milieu Teaching, and others) to encourage Language Development with frequency of session as 12 sessions; minimum 30 mins each day, 3x per week.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Parent Child Interaction Therapy
Parent was trained in a structured way during two phases of PCIT that are Phase 1: Child Directed Intervention and Phase 2: Parent Directed Intervention to encourage Language Development with frequency of sessions as 12 sessions; minimum 30 mins each day, 3x per week.
Conventional Parent Led Therapy
Parent was trained in an unstructured way by using different language development strategies (Imitation, Focused Stimulations, Milieu Teaching, and others) to encourage Language Development with frequency of session as 12 sessions; minimum 30 mins each day, 3x per week.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Children diagnosed with Down Syndrome
* Children that have acquired pre linguistic skills like eye contact, non-verbal imitation, joint attention, turn taking
* Children having nonverbal intentional communication.
* Children having core receptive vocabulary of 50 words.
* Parents
* Mother or father of a child with Down syndrome.
Exclusion Criteria
* Children with co morbid conditions like hearing and visual impairment.
* Child concurrently enrolled in other Speech therapy programs. Parents
* Parents previously trained for PCIT.
1 Year
11 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Riphah International University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Soabah Wasim, MS SLP
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riphah International University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Riphah International University Gulberg Green
Islamabad, Federal, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cronin SM. An effectiveness study of a parent-child interaction therapy with children with Down syndrome.
Roberts MY, Curtis PR, Sone BJ, Hampton LH. Association of Parent Training With Child Language Development: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Jul 1;173(7):671-680. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1197.
Agarwal Gupta N, Kabra M. Diagnosis and management of Down syndrome. Indian J Pediatr. 2014 Jun;81(6):560-7. doi: 10.1007/s12098-013-1249-7. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
Spellun A, Harstad E, Hojlo M, Milliken A, Pawlowski K, Sideridis G, Baumer N. Cross-Sectional Analysis of Caregiver-Reported Expressive Language Profiles and Associated Covariates in Individuals with Down Syndrome. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2024 Jan 1;45(1):e63-e71. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001236. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
Bittles AH, Bower C, Hussain R, Glasson EJ. The four ages of Down syndrome. Eur J Public Health. 2007 Apr;17(2):221-5. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckl103. Epub 2006 Jul 19.
Yamauchi Y, Aoki S, Koike J, Hanzawa N, Hashimoto K. Motor and cognitive development of children with Down syndrome: The effect of acquisition of walking skills on their cognitive and language abilities. Brain Dev. 2019 Apr;41(4):320-326. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
02114 Ishrat
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.