Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
36 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-08-13
2026-06-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Two Summative Assessment Methods in Advanced Life Support Courses
NCT03412032
Participant Satisfaction With Two Different Summative Assessment Methods - a Mixed Method Questionnaire Study
NCT03381443
The Application of Intermittent Training in Clinical Skills Simulation Training
NCT07239531
Crisis Resource Management Improvement Through Intellectual Questioning of Authority
NCT03707964
Self-learning vs Instructor-led Learning in BLS
NCT03141528
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Residents will submit their critiques of the journal articles prior to the scheduled journal club via a dedicated residency website. They will focus on potential methodological flaws of the article. This is congruent to how journal club didactics were focused in the past in the institution, so second and third years will have had exposure to this approach.
During journal club, besides having the resident that selected the article briefly present it, resident critiques will be discussed. A single point will be awarded to each resident for each critique they have submitted. For critiques of significant merit, as determined by the faculty, the journal club facilitator will invite the submitting resident to discuss their critique, and will be awarded 2 points. To discourage artificial intelligence (AI) use without learning, critiques will be selected at faculty discretion to be orally explained during journal club to the satisfaction of the faculty. The faculty have determined that if residents utilize AI as a tool to enhance their learning (instead of simply enumerating critiques blindly on a document), this is in service towards the goal of journal club, and should be encouraged.
As a reward, residents that have the highest running score will receive $100 Amazon gift cards, tiered by 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year academic status.
Attitudes towards the importance of critical assessment of scientific literature, self assessments of fluency in scientific literature appraisal, and the effectiveness of journal club, will be conducted via anonymous survey on RedCap at the beginning and end of the academic year. The survey utilized will be the modified version of a previously validated survey used by Haspel2. Additionally, residents will be assigned Journal Club based quizzes from Rosh Review13, a platform tailored for resident education, at the beginning and end of the year. Rosh Review provides comparative benchmarks that can be used to assess resident performance.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Residency Cohort
Full complement of site emergency medicine residents
Competition based Education Format
Residents will be organized into 3 teams, each competing to amass points for critiquing articles presented during journal club, for a prize.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Competition based Education Format
Residents will be organized into 3 teams, each competing to amass points for critiquing articles presented during journal club, for a prize.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Greg Neyman
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Barnabas Health Community Medical Center
Toms River, New Jersey, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
McLeod RS, MacRae HM, McKenzie ME, Victor JC, Brasel KJ; Evidence Based Reviews in Surgery Steering Committee. A moderated journal club is more effective than an Internet journal club in teaching critical appraisal skills: results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Dec;211(6):769-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.08.016. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
Horneff, J, Baldwin, K, Ahn, J.. "The Value of Journal Clubs in Orthopaedic Resident Education." (2010). University of Pennsylvania Orthopedic Journal
Dzara K, Frey-Vogel AS. Medical Education Journal Club for the Millennial Resident: An Interactive, No-Prep Approach. Acad Pediatr. 2019 Aug;19(6):603-607. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 14.
Allon S, Baggett A, Hayes B, Glosemeyer K, Cavo J, Pacha R, Zurko J, Patel N, Kraemer R. Association of a Gamified Journal Club on Internal Medicine Residents' Engagement and Critical Appraisal Skills. J Grad Med Educ. 2023 Aug;15(4):475-480. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00812.1.
Moharari RS, Rahimi E, Najafi A, Khashayar P, Khajavi MR, Meysamie AP. Teaching critical appraisal and statistics in anesthesia journal club. QJM. 2009 Feb;102(2):139-41. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcn131. Epub 2008 Oct 8.
Luc JGY, Fowler CS, Eisenberg SB, Estrera AL, Wolf RK, Choi CW, Lawton JS, Martin LW, Nesbitt JC, Reznik SI, Nguyen TC, Vaporciyan AA, Antonoff MB; Thoracic Education Cooperative Group (TECoG). Multiinstitutional Evaluation of a Debate-Style Journal Club for Cardiothoracic Surgery Trainees. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Jul;114(1):327-333. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.07.104. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
Linzer M, Brown JT, Frazier LM, DeLong ER, Siegel WC. Impact of a medical journal club on house-staff reading habits, knowledge, and critical appraisal skills. A randomized control trial. JAMA. 1988 Nov 4;260(17):2537-41.
Wegleitner, Elizabeth and Octavio R Chirino. "Join the Club: Integration of the CREOG Journal Club Curriculum Improves OBGYN Residents Statistical Literacy." Obstetrics & Gynecology (2019): 134():p 48S, October 2019
Hartzell JD, Veerappan GR, Posley K, Shumway NM, Durning SJ. Resident run journal club: a model based on the adult learning theory. Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):e156-61. doi: 10.1080/01421590802516723.
Arti Muley, J. Lakhani "Evidence based vs traditional journal clubs: Time to switchover." The Journal of medical research 2015 1(1): 13-17 https://doi.org/10.31254/jmr.2015.1106
Haspel RL. Implementation and assessment of a resident curriculum in evidence-based transfusion medicine. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010 Jul;134(7):1054-9. doi: 10.5858/2009-0328-OA.1.
Alavi-Moghaddam M, Yazdani S, Mortazavi F, Chichi S, Hosseini-Zijoud SM. Evidence-based Medicine versus the Conventional Approach to Journal Club Sessions: Which One Is More Successful in Teaching Critical Appraisal Skills? Chonnam Med J. 2016 May;52(2):107-11. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2016.52.2.107. Epub 2016 May 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
25-007
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.