Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
72 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-01-31
2027-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Respiratory infections like influenza and SARS-CoV-2 pose significant global health risks due to their high transmissibility and severity. SARS-CoV-2 has caused over 7 million deaths worldwide, and the Lancet Commission estimates a \>20% chance of a similar respiratory virus pandemic within a decade. Schools, often poorly ventilated, are high-risk settings for transmission. While COVID-19 school closures may have reduced transmission, they likely caused learning loss, mental health issues, and increased burdens on parents and caregivers. Air purifiers with HEPA filters may offer a non-disruptive mitigation strategy, but the evidence to support their effectiveness in reducing viral transmission is weak. This protocol describes a cluster-randomised, parallel, two-arm, group sequential superiority trial with an interim analysis-to allow early stopping for efficacy or futility-to estimate the effect of portable air purifiers with HEPA filters in primary school classrooms on student absenteeism.
Research Questions
The primary question is whether installing and operating air purifiers with HEPA-filters (intervention) reduce student absenteeism (primary outcome) compared to sham air purifiers (control). Secondary questions examine whether the intervention reduces teacher absenteeism due to respiratory infections, rate and 12-week risk of self-reported respiratory infections among teachers, and teachers' perceived air quality compared to sham air purifiers. If the trial estimates a statistically significant effect for the primary outcome, a cost-consequence analysis will evaluate the direct and indirect costs associating with operating air purifiers against the potential benefits of reduced student and teacher absenteeism. A process evaluation will explore mechanisms of effect.
Methods and Analysis
This group sequential trial will randomize schools (clusters) 1:1 to intervention or control arms in two stages: winter 2025/2026 (N = 32 schools; \~736 students) and winter 2026/2027 (N = 30 schools; \~690 students). Eligible schools must have classrooms suitable for portable air purifiers, \>10 students in grades 5-7 (typically aged 10-13 years), and principal consent. Intervention and control classrooms will each receive two portable air purifiers with HEPA-filters operating at a performance equivalent to 3.0 and 0.3 air changes per hour, respectively, with control purifiers acting as shams.
Outcomes will be measured during and at the end of a 12-week period. The primary outcome is student absenteeism, measured as full child-days of absence aggregated at the class level. An interim analysis is planned at the end of the first stage, with error-spending O'Brien-Fleming stopping boundaries that are binding for efficacy and nonbinding for futility.
The primary estimand is the marginal incidence rate ratio of student absences, estimated using generalized estimating equations with a negative binomial model to account for overdispersion. Prespecified stopping boundaries will determine stopping, with efficacy boundaries being binding. Treatment effects will be estimated using cluster-bootstrapped confidence intervals adjusted to provide strong control on overall type I and II error probabilities, and a bias correction will be applied if the trial is stopped early for efficacy. All analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle.
Ethics and Dissemination
The trial has been approved by the Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics and the National Research Ethics Committee. Results will be disseminated to stakeholders, participants and the public through peer-reviewed journals, scientific meetings and social media.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
School Inner City Air Study
NCT05953233
Health Benefits of Air Purifiers in Primary School Students
NCT05016271
Short-term Health Benefits of Using Fresh Air Filtration System in Classroom
NCT03788330
Particulate Reduction Education in City Homes
NCT00466024
Reducing Respiratory Virus Transmission in Bangladeshi Classrooms
NCT06247059
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
The control is the installation and operation of two sham air purifiers per control classroom. These will be identical in appearance and placement to the intervention units and will also include a HEPA filter, but they will be modified by the manufacturer to operate at the lowest fan setting permitted by the motor. This setting results in minimal airflow and negligible air-cleaning capacity but may also produce less sound than the intervention units. The sham air purifiers will operate at a performance equivalent to 0.3 air changes per hour, providing a combined CARD of at least 48 m3/hour
PREVENTION
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
The intervention is the installation and operation of two portable air purifiers with HEPA filters per intervention school classroom. Each air purifier will operate at a level corresponding to 3.0 air changes per hour, providing a combined capacity corresponding to a Clean Air Delivery Rate (CADR) of at least 486 m3/hour.
Air purifiers
Air purifiers
Control
The control is the installation and operation of two sham air purifiers per control classroom. These will be identical in appearance and placement to the intervention units and will also include a HEPA filter, but they will be modified by the manufacturer to operate at the lowest fan setting permitted by the motor. This setting results in minimal airflow and negligible air-cleaning capacity but may also produce less sound than the intervention units. The sham air purifiers will operate at a performance equivalent to 0.3 air changes per hour, providing a combined CARD of at least 48 m3/hour.
Sham air purifiers
Sham air purifiers
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Air purifiers
Air purifiers
Sham air purifiers
Sham air purifiers
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Schools with at least one classroom of sufficient dimensions to accommodate the installation of two portable air purifiers.
For logistical and administrative reasons, the investigators will try to limit the sampling frame to schools in municipalities located close our offices in Oslo. These municipalities include several large towns with populations of around 30 000 to 100 000 people, as well as sparsely populated rural areas, and are therefore reasonably representative of Norway and many other countries. The investigators will enlarge the sampling frame as necessary.
The second population is teachers at primary schools in Norway. Teachers meeting the following criteria will be eligible.
1. Be the main class teacher of one or more of the classrooms included in the trial.
2. Provide informed consent.
10 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Oslo, Oslo County, Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
737650
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.