Home Air Filtration for Traffic-Related Air Pollution

NCT ID: NCT04279249

Last Updated: 2024-11-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

156 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-11-15

Study Completion Date

2024-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a blinded randomized crossover efficacy trial (N=172 households consisting of 207 participants) of High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filtration in near-highway homes that lack mechanical air-handling systems. Households will be randomized to 30 days of either filtration or sham filtration followed by a 30 washout period with a subsequent 30-day period of the alternative assignment. Room air filters that are commercially available will be placed in the bedroom and living room of each home.

The investigators will measure UFP and PM2.5 concentrations in 20% of the homes during filtration and sham periods and assess personal exposure in a subset of participants. The investigators will also assess chemical composition of particulate air pollution in 10 homes/year for exploratory purposes that could lead to future lines of research. The primary health endpoints will be participants' hsCRP and peripheral blood pressure, measures that the investigators have used in multiple observational studies of UFP as well as in pilot filtration intervention studies. Secondary biological measures that contribute to understanding biological pathways will be IL-6 (inflammation), D-dimer (coagulation), metabolome, central pressure and arterial stiffness. The primary intention to treat analysis will compare outcomes between HEPA filtration to sham filtration. The investigators will have 80% power to detect a difference of 0.6 mg/L in change in hsCRP and a difference in reduction in systolic blood pressure of 3.5 mmHg compared to participants who receive no filtration. Having participants serve as their own controls in the within-subject comparisons of intervention effectiveness increases statistical power and eliminates the possibility of baseline imbalances in demographic and clinical characteristics. A social science evaluation will inform final adjustments to the investigators' approach at the start and also assess participant acceptance and experience with the intervention at the end. The investigators' primary innovation is that this will be the first near highway HEPA intervention trial that is large enough and careful enough to be policy-relevant.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Specific Aims:

Specific Aim 1: To test the effect of HEPA filtration on markers of cardiovascular risk for adults who live near urban highways. 207 participants will be enrolled in a double blind, randomized crossover trial of 30-day periods with and without filtration separated by a 30-day wash out period. The intervention will be during colder months (Oct-Mar) when ambient UFP are elevated and windows tend to be closed, thereby allowing for maximization of the exposure contrast between HEPA and sham conditions. The investigators hypothesize that the HEPA filtration intervention will be associated with indications of improved health in the primary health outcomes: blood pressure (systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressure); and hsCRP (a measure of inflammation).

Specific Aim 2: To assess whether the intervention succeeded or failed in participant homes. To determine effectiveness of the filtration intervention, the investigators will 1) measure particle pollution levels inside and outside 20% of the homes, and 2) use quantitative surveys and open-ended questions to evaluate how participants interacted with the intervention.

Specific Aim 3: To assess biomarkers that can suggest biological pathways by which filtration affects cardiovascular risk. Study participants will be measured for IL-6 (inflammation), D-dimer (coagulation), central blood pressure, and arterial stiffness (endothelial dysfunction), which constitute key steps along the presumed biological pathways. The peripheral blood plasma of all participants will also undergo metabolome analysis to provide additional evidence of biological pathways. The investigators propose this to follow on an exciting recent study that used a similar approach 24, and preliminary metabolome analysis.

Exploratory Aims: To analyze particle composition. In a subset of homes (30 homes total, 10/year), the investigators will perform detailed physical and chemical analysis of PM1 (particles \<1,000 nm) to inform future work on composition-dependent health impacts and filtration effectiveness for UFP. Also in a subset of homes, assess personal exposures for 24 participants. The scientific premise is that HEPA filtration in homes without mechanical ventilation systems can reduce UFP (and overall PM) levels leading to positive changes in biomarkers. The study design and approach are rigorous, using a double blind, randomized cross over trial. The investigators will also measure objective biomarkers of risk of cardiovascular disease. The primary innovation is that this will be the first HEPA intervention trial near highways that is large enough to rule in or out efficacy of stand-alone HEPA filters from traffic pollution

Hypotheses:

1. For Aim 1, the investigators hypothesize that the HEPA filtration intervention will be associated with statistically significant improvements of peripheral blood pressure (BP) and C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
2. The investigators hypothesize that measures collected for Aim 3 will show that UFP is associated with antioxidant pathways, in vivo generation of reactive oxygen species, and processes critical to endothelial functions, as well as indicators of early vascular aging.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiovascular Risk Factor Blood Pressure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

This study is a randomized crossover trial, in which study participants are randomly assigned (by computer) to different arms of the study in which they receive different interventions - in this case, either the HEPA air filter or the sham filter. The two arms will run concurrently, rather than sequentially.

Primary Outcome Measures will be measured concurrently, rather than at separate time points (i.e., blood pressure and blood samples will both be taken at study onset, 30 days, 60 days and 90 days) and therefore fall within the same time points.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HEPA Filtration

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

HEPA Air Filtration

Intervention Type OTHER

2 HEPA air filters placed in home (one in bedroom, one in living room) for 30 days

Sham HEPA Filtration

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham HEPA Air Filtration

Intervention Type OTHER

2 HEPA air filter devices with filter removed placed in home (one in bedroom, one in living room) for 30 days

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HEPA Air Filtration

2 HEPA air filters placed in home (one in bedroom, one in living room) for 30 days

Intervention Type OTHER

Sham HEPA Air Filtration

2 HEPA air filter devices with filter removed placed in home (one in bedroom, one in living room) for 30 days

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* residence within 200 m of interstate I-93 in Somerville
* live at home full time
* cognitive ability to answer questionnaires
* able to speak English/Spanish

Exclusion Criteria

* in-home mechanical air handling system with forced air pushed through vents
* smoker or lives with smoker(s)
* history of heart attack, stroke, or other major cardiovascular outcome
* taking anti-hypertensive or anti-inflammation medications
* occupational or other routine high exposures (away from home) to traffic pollution
* extensive use of candles/incense inside the home

Preferred Criteria:

* residents of apartments with highway-facing windows and that are no more than 3 stories tall
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Somerville Transportation Equity Partnership, Inc.

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tufts University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Olin College of Engineering

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Welcome Project Inc

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

UConn Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Douglas Brugge

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Doug Brugge, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tufts University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UConn Health

Farmington, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Singh-Smith K, Sprague Martinez L, Eliasziw M, Lerman Ginzburg S, Hudda N, Betz GM, Gurcan A, Vazquez-Dodero T, Mertl A, Goldstein-Gelb W, Zamore W, Brugge D. Reaction to at-home air purifiers installed to reduce traffic-related air pollution in near-highway residences. Trials. 2024 Aug 19;25(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08388-z.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39160612 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01ES030289

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

20-109-2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Boston Puerto Rican Health Study
NCT03187704 COMPLETED NA
School Inner City Air Study
NCT05953233 RECRUITING NA