EFFECTS OF IRRIGATION NEEDLES WITH DIFFERENT DESIGNS USED DURING ENDODONTIC TREATMENT ON POSTOPERATIVE PAIN
NCT ID: NCT07080918
Last Updated: 2025-07-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
66 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-01-01
2024-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Postoperative Pain After İntracanal Procedures
NCT04892355
Postoperative Pain After the Use of Different Last Irrigation Method During Root Canal Treatment in Primary Teeth
NCT04197531
Evaluation of Different Root Canal Irrigation Techniques
NCT07106320
Evaluation of Post Operative Pain After Sonic Activation and Different Irrigation Needles During Root Canal Treatment
NCT05840783
Effect of Different Modalities of Cryotherapy on Post-Operative Pain in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis
NCT06304259
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Before the procedure, the patients' medical and dental histories were taken, and preoperative pain levels were recorded. Each patient received an inferior alveolar nerve block using a 2 ml local anesthetic solution (Ultracain D-S forte, Sanofi, France) containing 80 mg articaine hydrochloride and 0.024 mg epinephrine hydrochloride. After the teeth related to the rubber dam were isolated, caries and any existing restorations were removed using diamond burs, and a standard endodontic access cavity was prepared.
For canal length determination, #10 K-type (Perfect, China) hand files were used, and the working length was determined with an electronic apex locator (Woodpecker, Endo Radar Pro, China) and confirmed radiologically.
Root canal preparation was performed using an endodontic motor (Woodpecker, Endo Radar Pro, China) and a nickel-titanium rotary instrument system (Scope Endodontic System, Turkey) at a speed of 300 rpm and a torque of 2 N/cm. Apical preparation was completed to a size three larger. During shaping, at the point where apical resistance was encountered, excessive torsional loading was prevented by removing the files from the canal, cleaning the debris from the files, and irrigating the root canals.
During the shaping process, the root canals were rinsed with 2 ml of 2.5% NaOCl after each file change and recapitulated with a #10K file. After the root canal preparation procedure was completed, each canal was rinsed with 5 ml of 2.5% NaOCl, and the NaOCl solution was activated using an endoactivator in three 20-second cycles. 5 ml of distilled water was applied to remove NaOCl residues from the canal. Then, 2 ml of 17% EDTA (Endo-Solution, Cerkamed, Stalowa Wola, Poland) was applied for 1 minute. To neutralize the EDTA residues, each canal was finally irrigated with 5 ml of distilled water.
Irrigation procedures were performed with needles of different designs, each 30 G, for three different groups:
For group 1, an open-ended notched irrigation needle (Endo-Top, Cerkamed, Stalowa Wola, Poland) was used, For group 2, a closed-ended single orifice irrigation needle (Scope Endo Fx Ject, Turkey) was used, For group 3, a closed-ended double orifice irrigation needle (Double Sideport, Raito, China) was used.
The irrigation needles were used 2 mm shorter than the working length. The root canals were shaped using appropriate paper points (Meta Biomed, Korea). The root canals were filled using the lateral condensation technique with gutta-percha (Diadent Group International, Canada) and epoxy resin-based root canal paste (Dentac, Turkey). The permanent restoration was completed with light-curing composite (Coltene Whaledent Brilliant Ng, Switzerland), and occlusal adjustment was checked. Patients were prescribed 400 mg of ibuprofen and advised to use it when absolutely necessary.Evaluation of Postoperative Pain Patients were given a postoperative pain assessment form that included a visual analog scale (VAS) to evaluate their postoperative pain levels. Patients were informed about the topic and asked to record their pain levels and analgesic usage on the provided form at 6, 24, 48, 72 hours, and on the 7th day. Patients were called for a follow-up session one week later, and the given forms were collected.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
For group 1, an open-ended notched irrigation needle (Endo-Top, Cerkamed, Stalowa Wola, Poland)Raito, China)
Irrigation
Irrigation procedures were performed with needles of different designs, each 30 G, for three different groups
Group 2
For group 2, a closed-ended single orifice irrigation needle (Scope Endo Fx Ject, Turkey)
Irrigation
Irrigation procedures were performed with needles of different designs, each 30 G, for three different groups
Group 3
For group 3,a closed-ended double orifice irrigation needle (Double Sideport, Raito, China)
Irrigation
Irrigation procedures were performed with needles of different designs, each 30 G, for three different groups
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Irrigation
Irrigation procedures were performed with needles of different designs, each 30 G, for three different groups
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with preoperative pain score ranging from moderate to severe (4-10) on a visual analog scale (VAS, 0-10)
* Mandibular molar teeth were diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy or lactation
* Teeth with periapical lesions,
* Teeth that previous root canal treatment,
* Teeth with calcified canals,
* Teeth with periodontal diseases,
* Teeth with sensitivite to percussion and palpation,
* Teeth with bruxism/traumatic occlusion,
* Teeth with crown or root fractures,
* Teeth with internal or external resorption,
* Teeth with immature/open apex,
* Patients who had taken antibiotics in the last two weeks,
* Patients who had taken analgesic or anti-inflammatory drugs within the last 12 hours,
* Patients missing consent and follow-up forms.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Akdeniz University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Damla Kırıcı
Damla Kırıcı
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Damla Kırıcı, Associate Prof
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Akdeniz University
Damla Kırıcı, ASSOCİATE PROF
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
AkdenizUniversity
DAMLA KIRICI, ASSOCİATE PROF
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
AKDENİZ UNİVERSİTY
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
AkdenizUniversity
Antalya, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
143
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.