Oncologic Outcomes of Minimal Access Nipple-sparing Mastectomy Compared With Conventional Approach in Breast Cancer

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1129 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2000-02-01

Study Completion Date

2024-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this study the investigators investigate the oncological outcomes of minimal access nipple sparing mastectomy compared with conventional nipple sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Robotic Versus Conventional or Endoscopic Nipple Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer

NCT04049305

Breast Cancer Female

UNKNOWN NA

Robotic Versus Conventional or Endoscopic Nipple Sparing Mastectomy in the Management of Breast Cancer-Prospective Study

NCT04037852

Breast Cancer Female

UNKNOWN NA

Clinical Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Breast-Conserving Surgery for Central Breast Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT06938360

Breast Cancer

RECRUITING NA

Endoscopic and Robotic NSM with Immediate Prosthesis Breast Reconstruction

NCT06748677

Nipple-sparing Mastectomy Immediate Prosthesis Reconstruction Endoscopic Surgery +1 more

RECRUITING

To Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Single-port Robotic-assisted Breast Surgery in Breast Cancer

NCT06561646

Breast Cancer

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database was conducted from single institute to compare the oncologic outcomes of MA-NSM versus C-NSM. The clinical results and oncologic outcome (margin involved rate, local recurrence and overall survival) were compared between groups. To prevent bias, a case control approach was conducted with propensity score matching (PSM) method.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

minimal acccess NSM

No interventions assigned to this group

conventional NSM

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* primary operable breast cancer and had undergone NSM

Exclusion Criteria

* had metastatic disease, non-malignant breast disease cases, bilateral breast cancer cases, recurrent breast cancer as well as male breast cancer cases and patients who did not undergo NSM

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No