Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Vs Conventional Open Technique

NCT ID: NCT03440398

Last Updated: 2023-06-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

82 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-31

Study Completion Date

2023-12-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This trial is designed to compare robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate robotic breast reconstruction with conventional open technique. It is a prospective randomized trial evaluating patients satisfaction

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

High proportion of patients with newly diagnosed early-stage breast cancer in Europe and US undergo to mastectomy. The absolute numbers of mastectomy rates in US is still today around 38% and represent one of the most performed operation for cancer reasons. Despite the lack of a natural cavity needed for endoscopic viewing, applications of robotic surgery have recently emerged for superficial organs such as in the fields of thyroidectomy, oropharyngeal surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery. However, it has never been applied in breast cancer except for a feasibility and safety study conducted at European Institute of Oncology.

The technique was firstly published by Toesca et al. considering the first 3 cases. The same research as continued on breast cancer evaluating feasibility, reproducibility and safety studying 26 consecutive procedures of robotic nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate robotic breast reconstruction (article under peer to peer review at European Journal of Surgical Oncology, EJSO). In these initial cases of robotic nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction authors found two main advantages such as the robotic optical vision and the minimal invasiveness. The two main limitations noticed in this initial experience were the duration of operating time and the additional costs related to the operation. The limitations of the applicability of robotic surgery to the breast, such as operating time and costs, might be offset by the advantages they observed such as better vision and minimally invasive approach with an anatomically more respectful mastectomy.

This project is a superiority trial comparing robotic nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate breast robotic reconstruction with conventional open technique.

The primary end-point is to evaluate patient satisfaction. Second end-point is to compare post-operative outcome considering complications, post-operative pain, reduction of the average length of stay of patients, long term oncological outcome of the two different surgical techniques.

Patients will be randomized into two treatment arms:

A. Open nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implant (Open NSM) B. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate robotic breast reconstruction with implant (Robotic NSM) Both arms will undergo to the same pre-surgical staging, intra-operative axillary surgical staging, post-operative multidisciplinary evaluation and adjuvant treatments according to international and internal protocols.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Open NSM

Conventional Nipple Sparing Mastectomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Open NSM

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implant

Robotic NSM

Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Robotic NSM

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgical technique conducted using robot to perform nipple sparing mastectomy and breast reconstruction

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Robotic NSM

Surgical technique conducted using robot to perform nipple sparing mastectomy and breast reconstruction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open NSM

Open nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implant

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Invasive breast cancer, Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, Breast Related Cancer Antigens mutation carriers.
* Any age
* Candidates to nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction
* Negative preoperative assessment of nipple-areola complex
* Absence of skin involvement
* Low probability to have positivity of nipple-areola complex tissue intra-operative frozen section
* Breast volume ≤ Bra IV; from cup A to D
* No hard smoking (hard smoking defined as \>20 cigarettes/day)
* Low and intermediate risk for anesthesia (ASA Scale)
* Written informed consent must be signed and dated by the patient and the investigator prior to inclusion
* Patients must be accessible for follow-up

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous thoracic radiation therapy for any reason
* Inflammatory Breast Cancer
* Skin involvement
* Pre-operative diagnosis (radiological or cytological) of nipple-areola complex disease
* Pregnancy
* Patients with psychiatric, addictive, or any disorder, which compromises ability to give informed consent for participation in this study
* Uncompensated Diabetes Mellitus
* Hard smokers (hard smoking defined as \>20 cigarettes/day)
* High risk for anesthesia
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

European Institute of Oncology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Antonio Toesca, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

European Institute of Oncology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

European Institute of Oncology

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A, Galimberti V, Intra M, Colleoni M, Bonanni B, Curigliano G, Rietjens M, Viale G, Sacchini V, Veronesi P. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer: Feasibility and safety study. Breast. 2017 Feb;31:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Nov 2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27810700 (View on PubMed)

Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A, Nevola Teixeira LF. Reply to the letter to the editor "Robotic-assisted Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: A feasibility study on cadaveric models" by Sarfati B. et al. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Apr;70(4):558-560. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.12.022. Epub 2017 Jan 23. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28153430 (View on PubMed)

Toesca A, Peradze N, Galimberti V, Manconi A, Intra M, Gentilini O, Sances D, Negri D, Veronesi G, Rietjens M, Zurrida S, Luini A, Veronesi U, Veronesi P. Robotic Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction With Implant: First Report of Surgical Technique. Ann Surg. 2017 Aug;266(2):e28-e30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001397. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28692558 (View on PubMed)

Toesca A, Sangalli C, Maisonneuve P, Massari G, Girardi A, Baker JL, Lissidini G, Invento A, Farante G, Corso G, Rietjens M, Peradze N, Gottardi A, Magnoni F, Bottiglieri L, Lazzeroni M, Montagna E, Labo P, Orecchia R, Galimberti V, Intra M, Sacchini V, Veronesi P. A Randomized Trial of Robotic Mastectomy Versus Open Surgery in Women With Breast Cancer or BrCA Mutation. Ann Surg. 2022 Jul 1;276(1):11-19. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004969. Epub 2021 Jun 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34597010 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R 530/16- IEO 562

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Robotic vs. Open NSM for Early Stage Breast Cancer
NCT05720039 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA