Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Vs Conventional Open Technique
NCT ID: NCT03440398
Last Updated: 2023-06-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
82 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-03-31
2023-12-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Robotic Nipple Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Reconstruction
NCT06860217
Robot-assisted vs. Open Nipple-sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Breast Reconstruction
NCT05490433
Robotic Versus Conventional or Endoscopic Nipple Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer
NCT04049305
Robotic Versus Conventional or Endoscopic Nipple Sparing Mastectomy in the Management of Breast Cancer-Prospective Study
NCT04037852
Evaluation of Well Being and Patient Reported Outcomes After Robotic Single-port Nipple Sparing Mastectomy and Implant Reconstruction
NCT07236359
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The technique was firstly published by Toesca et al. considering the first 3 cases. The same research as continued on breast cancer evaluating feasibility, reproducibility and safety studying 26 consecutive procedures of robotic nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate robotic breast reconstruction (article under peer to peer review at European Journal of Surgical Oncology, EJSO). In these initial cases of robotic nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction authors found two main advantages such as the robotic optical vision and the minimal invasiveness. The two main limitations noticed in this initial experience were the duration of operating time and the additional costs related to the operation. The limitations of the applicability of robotic surgery to the breast, such as operating time and costs, might be offset by the advantages they observed such as better vision and minimally invasive approach with an anatomically more respectful mastectomy.
This project is a superiority trial comparing robotic nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate breast robotic reconstruction with conventional open technique.
The primary end-point is to evaluate patient satisfaction. Second end-point is to compare post-operative outcome considering complications, post-operative pain, reduction of the average length of stay of patients, long term oncological outcome of the two different surgical techniques.
Patients will be randomized into two treatment arms:
A. Open nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implant (Open NSM) B. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate robotic breast reconstruction with implant (Robotic NSM) Both arms will undergo to the same pre-surgical staging, intra-operative axillary surgical staging, post-operative multidisciplinary evaluation and adjuvant treatments according to international and internal protocols.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Open NSM
Conventional Nipple Sparing Mastectomy
Open NSM
Open nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implant
Robotic NSM
Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
Robotic NSM
Surgical technique conducted using robot to perform nipple sparing mastectomy and breast reconstruction
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Robotic NSM
Surgical technique conducted using robot to perform nipple sparing mastectomy and breast reconstruction
Open NSM
Open nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implant
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Any age
* Candidates to nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction
* Negative preoperative assessment of nipple-areola complex
* Absence of skin involvement
* Low probability to have positivity of nipple-areola complex tissue intra-operative frozen section
* Breast volume ≤ Bra IV; from cup A to D
* No hard smoking (hard smoking defined as \>20 cigarettes/day)
* Low and intermediate risk for anesthesia (ASA Scale)
* Written informed consent must be signed and dated by the patient and the investigator prior to inclusion
* Patients must be accessible for follow-up
Exclusion Criteria
* Inflammatory Breast Cancer
* Skin involvement
* Pre-operative diagnosis (radiological or cytological) of nipple-areola complex disease
* Pregnancy
* Patients with psychiatric, addictive, or any disorder, which compromises ability to give informed consent for participation in this study
* Uncompensated Diabetes Mellitus
* Hard smokers (hard smoking defined as \>20 cigarettes/day)
* High risk for anesthesia
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
European Institute of Oncology
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Antonio Toesca, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
European Institute of Oncology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
European Institute of Oncology
Milan, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A, Galimberti V, Intra M, Colleoni M, Bonanni B, Curigliano G, Rietjens M, Viale G, Sacchini V, Veronesi P. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer: Feasibility and safety study. Breast. 2017 Feb;31:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A, Nevola Teixeira LF. Reply to the letter to the editor "Robotic-assisted Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: A feasibility study on cadaveric models" by Sarfati B. et al. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Apr;70(4):558-560. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.12.022. Epub 2017 Jan 23. No abstract available.
Toesca A, Peradze N, Galimberti V, Manconi A, Intra M, Gentilini O, Sances D, Negri D, Veronesi G, Rietjens M, Zurrida S, Luini A, Veronesi U, Veronesi P. Robotic Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction With Implant: First Report of Surgical Technique. Ann Surg. 2017 Aug;266(2):e28-e30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001397. No abstract available.
Toesca A, Sangalli C, Maisonneuve P, Massari G, Girardi A, Baker JL, Lissidini G, Invento A, Farante G, Corso G, Rietjens M, Peradze N, Gottardi A, Magnoni F, Bottiglieri L, Lazzeroni M, Montagna E, Labo P, Orecchia R, Galimberti V, Intra M, Sacchini V, Veronesi P. A Randomized Trial of Robotic Mastectomy Versus Open Surgery in Women With Breast Cancer or BrCA Mutation. Ann Surg. 2022 Jul 1;276(1):11-19. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004969. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Interview to Dr Toesca
Article on "La Repubblica"
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
R 530/16- IEO 562
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.