Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
75 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-01-21
2018-09-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Nipple Delay Prior to Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: A Pilot RCT
NCT02526719
The Oncological Safety and Cosmetic Outcome of Areola Sparing Mastectomy : a Single Arm, Prospective, Cohort Study
NCT03105570
Nipple Areola Complex Conservation
NCT00641628
Preoperative Evaluation of 3D Reconstruction Tool for Nipple-sparing Mastectomy
NCT06071234
NAC Sparing Mastectomy After Neo-adjuvant Chemotherapy
NCT02471742
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Nipple Sparing Mastectomy
Patients who undergo nipple sparing mastectomy with preservation of the nipple areolar complex.
Nipple Sparing Mastectomy
Skin sparing mastectomy with preservation of the nipple areolar complex
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nipple Sparing Mastectomy
Skin sparing mastectomy with preservation of the nipple areolar complex
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age greater than or equal to 18 at time of surgery
* BMI less than or equal to 35
* If mastectomy is indicated for removal of breast cancer, tumor is clinically T1 or T2
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior radiation to the affected breast
* Systemic lupus erythematosus
* Central tumor location and/or tumor within 2 cm of NAC
* Paget's disease of the nipple
* Clinical evidence of tumor involvement in the nipple
* Clinical evidence of axillary nodal tumor involvement
* Lymphovascular invasion of the tumor on core biopsy
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Richard L White, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Carolinas Healthcare
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Levine Cancer Institute
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vlajcic Z, Zic R, Stanec S, Lambasa S, Petrovecki M, Stanec Z. Nipple-areola complex preservation: predictive factors of neoplastic nipple-areola complex invasion. Ann Plast Surg. 2005 Sep;55(3):240-4. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000171680.49971.85.
Crowe JP, Patrick RJ, Yetman RJ, Djohan R. Nipple-sparing mastectomy update: one hundred forty-nine procedures and clinical outcomes. Arch Surg. 2008 Nov;143(11):1106-10; discussion 1110. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.11.1106.
Crowe JP Jr, Kim JA, Yetman R, Banbury J, Patrick RJ, Baynes D. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg. 2004 Feb;139(2):148-50. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.2.148.
Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros AC, Luini A, Pluchinotta A, Pinotti M, Boratto MG, Ricci MD, Ruiz CA, Nisida AC, Veronesi P, Petit J, Arnone P, Bassi F, Disa JJ, Garcia-Etienne CA, Borgen PI. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Nov;203(5):704-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.015. Epub 2006 Sep 11.
Stolier AJ, Sullivan SK, Dellacroce FJ. Technical considerations in nipple-sparing mastectomy: 82 consecutive cases without necrosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 May;15(5):1341-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9753-5. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
Wijayanayagam A, Kumar AS, Foster RD, Esserman LJ. Optimizing the total skin-sparing mastectomy. Arch Surg. 2008 Jan;143(1):38-45; discussion 45. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.1.38.
Banerjee A, Gupta S, Bhattacharya N. Preservation of nipple-areola complex in breast cancer--a clinicopathological assessment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008 Oct;61(10):1195-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.08.005. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
Loewen MJ, Jennings JA, Sherman SR, Slaikeu J, Ebrom PA, Davis AT, Fitzgerald TL. Mammographic distance as a predictor of nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2008 Mar;195(3):391-4; discussion 394-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.12.020.
Laronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D, Robb GL, Singletary SE. The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999 Sep;6(6):609-13. doi: 10.1007/s10434-999-0609-z.
Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, Muller H, Kuchenmeister I, Makovitzky J, Kundt G, Friese K. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003 Jul;238(1):120-7. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000077922.38307.cd.
Fitzal F. Can nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with modified extended latissimus dorsi muscular flap improve the cosmetic and functional outcome of patients with breast cancer? World J Surg. 2008 Mar;32(3):499; author reply 500-1. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9268-z. No abstract available.
Carlson GW, Losken A, Moore B, Thornton J, Elliott M, Bolitho G, Denson DD. Results of immediate breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 2001 Mar;46(3):222-8. doi: 10.1097/00000637-200103000-00003.
Lowery JC, Wilkins EG, Kuzon WM, Davis JA. Evaluations of aesthetic results in breast reconstruction: an analysis of reliability. Ann Plast Surg. 1996 Jun;36(6):601-6; discussion 607. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199606000-00007.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LCI NAC-SSM
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.