GF-GS 01: Comparing Conventional Axillary Dissection Versus Sentinel Node Resection in Clinically Node-negative Operable Breast Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00144898
Last Updated: 2019-05-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
1627 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-07-31
2012-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The GF-GS 01 study, sponsored by a National Hospital Research Program, compares this new surgical method with a classical method in patients having a negative sentinel node.
The duration of the follow-up is 5 years.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Surgery to Remove Sentinel Lymph Nodes With or Without Removing Lymph Nodes in the Armpit in Treating Women With Breast Cancer
NCT00003830
Sentinel Node Biopsy Alone or With Axillary Dissection After Primary Chemotherapy
NCT04436809
Sentinel Node Vs Observation After Axillary Ultra-souND
NCT02167490
Medico-economic Study of Three Strategies of Sentinel Lymph Node Analysis in Operable Breast Cancer
NCT02056886
Axillary Node Dissection Versus no Dissection in Breast Cancer With Positive Sentinel Lymph Node
NCT01717131
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sentinel Node Resection
Sentinel Node Resection
Sentinel Node Resection
Sentinel Node Resection
Conventional Axillary Dissection
Conventional Axillary Dissection
Conventional Axillary Dissection
Conventional Axillary Dissection
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sentinel Node Resection
Sentinel Node Resection
Conventional Axillary Dissection
Conventional Axillary Dissection
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Written consent is obtained from all patients before randomization.
18 Years
90 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospices Civils de Lyon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gilles HOUVENAEGHEL, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Institut Paoli Calmette
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Alain LEIZOROVICZ
Lyon, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Roy P, Leizorovicz A, Villet R, Mercier C, Bobin JY. Systematic versus sentinel-lymph-node-driven axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with operable breast cancer. Results of the GF-GS01 randomized trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jul;170(2):303-312. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4733-y. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2003.312
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.