GF-GS 01: Comparing Conventional Axillary Dissection Versus Sentinel Node Resection in Clinically Node-negative Operable Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00144898

Last Updated: 2019-05-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1627 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-07-31

Study Completion Date

2012-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Sentinel node resection appears as a promising advancement in the surgical treatment of breast cancer.

The GF-GS 01 study, sponsored by a National Hospital Research Program, compares this new surgical method with a classical method in patients having a negative sentinel node.

The duration of the follow-up is 5 years.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sentinel Node Resection

Sentinel Node Resection

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sentinel Node Resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sentinel Node Resection

Conventional Axillary Dissection

Conventional Axillary Dissection

Group Type OTHER

Conventional Axillary Dissection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional Axillary Dissection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sentinel Node Resection

Sentinel Node Resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional Axillary Dissection

Conventional Axillary Dissection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women older than 18 years with clinically node-negative operable unifocal N0 breast cancer (clinical tumour size \< 30 mm).
* Written consent is obtained from all patients before randomization.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospices Civils de Lyon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gilles HOUVENAEGHEL, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institut Paoli Calmette

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alain LEIZOROVICZ

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Roy P, Leizorovicz A, Villet R, Mercier C, Bobin JY. Systematic versus sentinel-lymph-node-driven axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with operable breast cancer. Results of the GF-GS01 randomized trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jul;170(2):303-312. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4733-y. Epub 2018 Mar 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29526019 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2003.312

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.