Axillary Node Dissection Versus no Dissection in Breast Cancer With Positive Sentinel Lymph Node

NCT ID: NCT01717131

Last Updated: 2024-01-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2228 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-07-19

Study Completion Date

2031-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Data from cohorts, prospective studies and one randomized trial (ASCOG Z0011) support the hypothesis that omission of additional axillary dissection in case of positive sentinel node has a limited impact on overall survival and relapse free survival. However, these data are not sufficient enough to recommend, as a standard of care, to avoid axillary dissection in case of positive sentinel node. The ASCOG Z0011 trial has been closed before the end of inclusions and the predefined non inferiority margin was found to be too large (5% difference at 5 years for primary endpoint).

Prospective randomized trial is then urgently mandatory before omission of axillary node dissection becomes a usual practice without a sufficient scientific level of proof. Indeed, in several reviews, the rate of omission of axillary node dissection in case of micrometastasis increased (Bilimoria) despite any strong proof has been demonstrated.

The omission of axillary node dissection in case of positive sentinel node may have strong practical impacts on patients but also on medical and economical aspects: in avoiding a prolonged hospitalisation, secondary morbidities due to axillary dissection requiring secondary care and their costs, as well as costs for secondary axillary dissection (14 to 25% in case of positive sentinel node) and finally shortening surgery duration.

The main investigator propose a Non Inferiority Randomized Multicenter Phase III Trial of Axillary Node Dissection Versus no Axillary Node Dissection in Case of Positive Sentinel Lymph Node in Invasive Breast Cancer

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Invasive Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Surgery for standard axillary node dissection

Standard axillary dissection

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Surgery for standard axillary node dissection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

No axillary lymph node dissection

No surgery of axillary lymph node In this study, the absence of surgery is the experimental arm (non-inferiority trial)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

No axillary lymph node dissection

Intervention Type OTHER

No surgery on axillary lymph node

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Surgery for standard axillary node dissection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

No axillary lymph node dissection

No surgery on axillary lymph node

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. \- Patient aged 18 years and above,
2. \- Patient with invasive breast cancer histologically proven or cytologically proven by fine needle biopsy,
3. \- Patient with a unifocal tumor T0 - T1 - T2 up to 5 cm (clinical or in imagery), without previous therapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy or hormone therapy),
4. \- Patient with clinical N0 status,
5. \- Absence of clinically detectable metastases known,

6- Patients for whom conservative surgery with sentinel lymph node (SLN) technique is feasible from the start in terms of carcinologic,

7 -All patients with lymph node involvement (GS+), whatever the size of the metastasis (macro-metastasis, micro-metastasis, cellular cluster or isolated tumor cells),

8 - Patient affiliated to a social security system or benefiting from such a system,

9 - Signed consent to participate.

Exclusion Criteria

1. \- Tumor of more than 5 cm
2. \- Indication of neoadjuvant therapy by chemotherapy or hormone therapy
3. \- History of breast cancer (ipsilateral, ie recurrence, or contralateral breast)
4. \- History of any other invasive cancer other than a past cutaneous cancer correctly treated
5. \- Initial metastatic disease known
6. \- Presence of clinical axillary adenopathy
7. \- Contra-indication to surgical excision
8. \- Contra-indication to the SLN technique
9. \- Pregnant women, of child-bearing potential, or lactating women

10- Patient deprived of liberty or under supervision of a guardian

11- Impossibility to undergo medical examinations of the study for geographical, social or psychological reasons.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institut Paoli-Calmettes

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gilles HOUVENAEGHEL, MD, PHD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institut Paoli-Calmettes

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Gilles HOUVENAEGHEL, PHD

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Giuliano AE, Ballman KV, McCall L, Beitsch PD, Brennan MB, Kelemen PR, Ollila DW, Hansen NM, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz PW, Leitch AM, Saha S, Hunt KK, Morrow M. Effect of Axillary Dissection vs No Axillary Dissection on 10-Year Overall Survival Among Women With Invasive Breast Cancer and Sentinel Node Metastasis: The ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Sep 12;318(10):918-926. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11470.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28898379 (View on PubMed)

Donker M, van Tienhoven G, Straver ME, Meijnen P, van de Velde CJ, Mansel RE, Cataliotti L, Westenberg AH, Klinkenbijl JH, Orzalesi L, Bouma WH, van der Mijle HC, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Veltkamp SC, Slaets L, Duez NJ, de Graaf PW, van Dalen T, Marinelli A, Rijna H, Snoj M, Bundred NJ, Merkus JW, Belkacemi Y, Petignat P, Schinagl DA, Coens C, Messina CG, Bogaerts J, Rutgers EJ. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Nov;15(12):1303-10. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70460-7. Epub 2014 Oct 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25439688 (View on PubMed)

Jagsi R, Chadha M, Moni J, Ballman K, Laurie F, Buchholz TA, Giuliano A, Haffty BG. Radiation field design in the ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 10;32(32):3600-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.5838. Epub 2014 Aug 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25135994 (View on PubMed)

Houvenaeghel G, Cohen M, Raro P, De Troyer J, de Lara CT, Gimbergues P, Gauthier T, Faure-Virelizier C, Vaini-Cowen V, Lantheaume S, Regis C, Darai E, Ceccato V, D'Halluin G, Del Piano F, Villet R, Jouve E, Beedassy B, Theret P, Gabelle P, Zinzindohoue C, Opinel P, Marsollier-Ferrer C, Dhainaut-Speyer C, Colombo PE, Lambaudie E, Tallet A, Boher JM; Others investigators (SERC trial group). Overview of the pathological results and treatment characteristics in the first 1000 patients randomized in the SERC trial: axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with involved sentinel node. BMC Cancer. 2018 Nov 21;18(1):1153. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5053-7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30463611 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.institutpaolicalmettes.fr

official web site of the sponsor

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SERC / IPC 2012-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.