Axillary Node Dissection Versus no Dissection in Breast Cancer With Positive Sentinel Lymph Node
NCT ID: NCT01717131
Last Updated: 2024-01-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
2228 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-07-19
2031-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Prospective randomized trial is then urgently mandatory before omission of axillary node dissection becomes a usual practice without a sufficient scientific level of proof. Indeed, in several reviews, the rate of omission of axillary node dissection in case of micrometastasis increased (Bilimoria) despite any strong proof has been demonstrated.
The omission of axillary node dissection in case of positive sentinel node may have strong practical impacts on patients but also on medical and economical aspects: in avoiding a prolonged hospitalisation, secondary morbidities due to axillary dissection requiring secondary care and their costs, as well as costs for secondary axillary dissection (14 to 25% in case of positive sentinel node) and finally shortening surgery duration.
The main investigator propose a Non Inferiority Randomized Multicenter Phase III Trial of Axillary Node Dissection Versus no Axillary Node Dissection in Case of Positive Sentinel Lymph Node in Invasive Breast Cancer
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Versus no Dissection in Breast Cancer With Positive Sentinel Lymph Node
NCT01796444
Surgical Resection With or Without Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Treating Women With Node-Negative Breast Cancer and Sentinel Lymph Node Micrometastases
NCT00072293
Comparison of Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Versus no Axillary Surgery
NCT02466737
Surgery to Remove Sentinel Lymph Nodes With or Without Removing Lymph Nodes in the Armpit in Treating Women With Breast Cancer
NCT00003830
Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: Omission of Axillary Clearance After Macrometastases. A Randomized Trial.
NCT02240472
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Surgery for standard axillary node dissection
Standard axillary dissection
Surgery for standard axillary node dissection
No axillary lymph node dissection
No surgery of axillary lymph node In this study, the absence of surgery is the experimental arm (non-inferiority trial)
No axillary lymph node dissection
No surgery on axillary lymph node
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Surgery for standard axillary node dissection
No axillary lymph node dissection
No surgery on axillary lymph node
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. \- Patient with invasive breast cancer histologically proven or cytologically proven by fine needle biopsy,
3. \- Patient with a unifocal tumor T0 - T1 - T2 up to 5 cm (clinical or in imagery), without previous therapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy or hormone therapy),
4. \- Patient with clinical N0 status,
5. \- Absence of clinically detectable metastases known,
6- Patients for whom conservative surgery with sentinel lymph node (SLN) technique is feasible from the start in terms of carcinologic,
7 -All patients with lymph node involvement (GS+), whatever the size of the metastasis (macro-metastasis, micro-metastasis, cellular cluster or isolated tumor cells),
8 - Patient affiliated to a social security system or benefiting from such a system,
9 - Signed consent to participate.
Exclusion Criteria
2. \- Indication of neoadjuvant therapy by chemotherapy or hormone therapy
3. \- History of breast cancer (ipsilateral, ie recurrence, or contralateral breast)
4. \- History of any other invasive cancer other than a past cutaneous cancer correctly treated
5. \- Initial metastatic disease known
6. \- Presence of clinical axillary adenopathy
7. \- Contra-indication to surgical excision
8. \- Contra-indication to the SLN technique
9. \- Pregnant women, of child-bearing potential, or lactating women
10- Patient deprived of liberty or under supervision of a guardian
11- Impossibility to undergo medical examinations of the study for geographical, social or psychological reasons.
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institut Paoli-Calmettes
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gilles HOUVENAEGHEL, MD, PHD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Institut Paoli-Calmettes
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Gilles HOUVENAEGHEL, PHD
Marseille, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Giuliano AE, Ballman KV, McCall L, Beitsch PD, Brennan MB, Kelemen PR, Ollila DW, Hansen NM, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz PW, Leitch AM, Saha S, Hunt KK, Morrow M. Effect of Axillary Dissection vs No Axillary Dissection on 10-Year Overall Survival Among Women With Invasive Breast Cancer and Sentinel Node Metastasis: The ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Sep 12;318(10):918-926. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11470.
Donker M, van Tienhoven G, Straver ME, Meijnen P, van de Velde CJ, Mansel RE, Cataliotti L, Westenberg AH, Klinkenbijl JH, Orzalesi L, Bouma WH, van der Mijle HC, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Veltkamp SC, Slaets L, Duez NJ, de Graaf PW, van Dalen T, Marinelli A, Rijna H, Snoj M, Bundred NJ, Merkus JW, Belkacemi Y, Petignat P, Schinagl DA, Coens C, Messina CG, Bogaerts J, Rutgers EJ. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Nov;15(12):1303-10. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70460-7. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
Jagsi R, Chadha M, Moni J, Ballman K, Laurie F, Buchholz TA, Giuliano A, Haffty BG. Radiation field design in the ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 10;32(32):3600-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.5838. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
Houvenaeghel G, Cohen M, Raro P, De Troyer J, de Lara CT, Gimbergues P, Gauthier T, Faure-Virelizier C, Vaini-Cowen V, Lantheaume S, Regis C, Darai E, Ceccato V, D'Halluin G, Del Piano F, Villet R, Jouve E, Beedassy B, Theret P, Gabelle P, Zinzindohoue C, Opinel P, Marsollier-Ferrer C, Dhainaut-Speyer C, Colombo PE, Lambaudie E, Tallet A, Boher JM; Others investigators (SERC trial group). Overview of the pathological results and treatment characteristics in the first 1000 patients randomized in the SERC trial: axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with involved sentinel node. BMC Cancer. 2018 Nov 21;18(1):1153. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5053-7.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
official web site of the sponsor
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SERC / IPC 2012-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.