Sentinel Node Vs Observation After Axillary Ultra-souND
NCT ID: NCT02167490
Last Updated: 2024-11-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
1560 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-01-31
2025-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* avoiding axillary surgery does not worsen the outcome of patients with small breast cancer the absence of the pathological information on the risk of recurrence given by nodal status is not worsening outcome of these patients
* pre-operative imaging of the axilla can identify patients with clinically relevant nodal burden.
The aims of this prospective randomized study are:
* to verify whether, in presence of a negative preoperative axillary assessment, SLN can be spared
* to verify whether, in presence of a negative preoperative axillary assessment, the decision on adjuvant medical treatment can be taken according only to the biology of the tumour without the prognostic information achieved by SLNB on the nodal status
* to verify whether, in presence of a negative preoperative axillary assessment, the patients' quality of life can be improved by a less invasive surgical procedure.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: Omission of Axillary Clearance After Macrometastases. A Randomized Trial.
NCT02240472
Axillary Dissection Based on the Histological Result of the Sentinel Node, in Patients With Breast Carcinoma
NCT00970983
Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancner: Omission of Axillary Clearance After Micrometastasis
NCT02049632
Surgery to Remove Sentinel Lymph Nodes With or Without Removing Lymph Nodes in the Armpit in Treating Women With Breast Cancer
NCT00003830
Medico-economic Study of Three Strategies of Sentinel Lymph Node Analysis in Operable Breast Cancer
NCT02056886
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This is a prospective randomized controlled trial in which patients with small breast cancer (T\<2 cm), with a negative preoperative assessment of the axilla (ultra-sound with FNAC in presence of doubtful findings) will be randomized into two treatment arms:
* SLNB ± axillary dissection
* No axillary surgical staging In the arm 1, no axillary dissection will be performed in case of either negative SLN or in presence of isolated tumour cells or micrometastases. SLNB will be completed by axillary dissection in presence of macrometastases diagnosed in the SLN.
The aims of this prospective randomized study are:
to verify whether, in presence of a negative preoperative axillary assessment, SLN can be spared to verify whether, in presence of a negative preoperative axillary assessment, the decision on adjuvant medical treatment can be taken according only to the biology of the tumour without the prognostic information achieved by SLNB on the nodal status to verify whether, in presence of a negative preoperative axillary assessment, the patients' quality of life can be improved by a less invasive surgical procedure.
Endpoints
The primary endpoint of the study is distant-disease free survival. This endpoint, a proxi of overall survival, will allow to have reliable results in a shorter period of time compared to overall survival.
Secondary endpoints will be the cumulative incidence of distant recurrences, the cumulative incidence of axillary recurrences, the disease free survival (DFS) and the overall survival (OS). Other secondary endpoints are quality of life and evaluation of type of adjuvant treatment administered.
Sample size calculation and statistical considerations
We will consider women who will undergo SLNB as the reference group, and we will test for non-inferiority the group of women not undergoing any treatment in the axilla. For the purpose of sample size calculation, the 5-year DDFS in the reference group is assumed to be 96.5%. Overall, 1560 women (780 per arm) will be enrolled to decide whether the group without treatment of the axilla is no worse than the reference group, given a margin delta of non-inferiority of 2.5% (maximum tolerable 5-years DDFS = 94%). Statistical power and one-sided type I error are set to 80% and 5%, respectively. After 3 years from the start of accrual an interim safety analysis will be performed.
Standard survival analyses and survival analyses with competing events will be performed. Multivariable Cox regression models will be applied to adjust the risk estimates of interest for other variables. The Chi-square test for trend, Chi-square test and the Fisher exact test will be used to evaluate differences in percentages between the two treatment groups, as appropriate. The T-tests will be used to evaluate differences in means for continuous variables.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1: sentinel node biopsy
Sentinel node biopsy policy
Arm 1: sentinel node biopsy
Sentinel node biopsy policy
Arm 2: observation
No axillary staging
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Arm 1: sentinel node biopsy
Sentinel node biopsy policy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* any age
* candidates to receive breast conserving surgery + radiotherapy
* negative preoperative assessment of the axilla (ultra-sound with or without FNAC in case one doubtful node is found)
* written informed consent must be signed and dated by the patient and the investigator prior to inclusion.
* patients must be accessible for follow-up.
Exclusion Criteria
* previous malignancy
* bilateral breast cancer
* multicentric or multifocal breast cancer
* previous primary systemic therapy
* pregnancy or breastfeeding
* pre-operative diagnosis (cytology or histology) of axillary lymph node metastases
* pre-operative radiological evidence of multiple involved or suspicious nodes
* patients with psychiatric, addictive, or any disorder, which compromises ability to give informed consent for participation in this study.
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
European Institute of Oncology
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Oreste D Gentilini, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
European Institute of Oncology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Instituto Oncologico Fundacion Arturo Lopez Perez
Santiago, , Chile
Comprensorio Sanitario
Bolzano, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera Spedali Civili
Brescia, , Italy
Ospedale Oncologico Regionale
Cagliari, , Italy
Humanitas Mater Domini
Castellanza, , Italy
Ospedale S. Anna
Como, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera Carlo Poma
Mantova, , Italy
European Institute of Oncology
Milan, , Italy
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori
Milan, , Italy
AOU Federico II
Napoli, , Italy
Istituto Nazionale Tumori
Napoli, , Italy
Ospedale San Matteo
Pavia, , Italy
Ospedale Guglielmo di Saliceto
Piacenza, , Italy
Ospedale Fatebenefratelli
Roma, , Italy
Humanitas Cancer Center
Rozzano, , Italy
Ospedale S. Anna
Torino, , Italy
Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe
Valencia, , Spain
Universitätsspital Bern Klinik und Poliklinik für Medizinische Onkologie
Bern, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, Luini A, Zurrida S, Galimberti V, Intra M, Veronesi P, Robertson C, Maisonneuve P, Renne G, De Cicco C, De Lucia F, Gennari R. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 7;349(6):546-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012782.
Veronesi U, Galimberti V, Paganelli G, Maisonneuve P, Viale G, Orecchia R, Luini A, Intra M, Veronesi P, Caldarella P, Renne G, Rotmensz N, Sangalli C, De Brito Lima L, Tullii M, Zurrida S. Axillary metastases in breast cancer patients with negative sentinel nodes: a follow-up of 3548 cases. Eur J Cancer. 2009 May;45(8):1381-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.041. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
Wasif N, Maggard MA, Ko CY, Giuliano AE. Underuse of axillary dissection for the management of sentinel node micrometastases in breast cancer. Arch Surg. 2010 Feb;145(2):161-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.269.
Galimberti V, Botteri E, Chifu C, Gentilini O, Luini A, Intra M, Baratella P, Sargenti M, Zurrida S, Veronesi P, Rotmensz N, Viale G, Sonzogni A, Colleoni M, Veronesi U. Can we avoid axillary dissection in the micrometastatic sentinel node in breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Feb;131(3):819-25. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1486-2. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
Giuliano AE, McCall L, Beitsch P, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz P, Leitch AM, Saha S, Hunt KK, Morrow M, Ballman K. Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2010 Sep;252(3):426-32; discussion 432-3. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f08f32.
Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz PW, Leitch AM, Saha S, McCall LM, Morrow M. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011 Feb 9;305(6):569-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.90.
Fisher B, Jeong JH, Anderson S, Bryant J, Fisher ER, Wolmark N. Twenty-five-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation. N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 22;347(8):567-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020128.
International Breast Cancer Study Group; Rudenstam CM, Zahrieh D, Forbes JF, Crivellari D, Holmberg SB, Rey P, Dent D, Campbell I, Bernhard J, Price KN, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD, Coates AS. Randomized trial comparing axillary clearance versus no axillary clearance in older patients with breast cancer: first results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 10-93. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24(3):337-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.5784. Epub 2005 Dec 12.
Veronesi U, Orecchia R, Zurrida S, Galimberti V, Luini A, Veronesi P, Gatti G, D'Aiuto G, Cataliotti L, Paolucci R, Piccolo P, Massaioli N, Sismondi P, Rulli A, Lo Sardo F, Recalcati A, Terribile D, Acerbi A, Rotmensz N, Maisonneuve P. Avoiding axillary dissection in breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial to assess the role of axillary radiotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2005 Mar;16(3):383-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi089. Epub 2005 Jan 24.
Goldhirsch A, Ingle JN, Gelber RD, Coates AS, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ; Panel members. Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2009. Ann Oncol. 2009 Aug;20(8):1319-29. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp322. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
Colleoni M, Rotmensz N, Peruzzotti G, Maisonneuve P, Mazzarol G, Pruneri G, Luini A, Intra M, Veronesi P, Galimberti V, Torrisi R, Cardillo A, Goldhirsch A, Viale G. Size of breast cancer metastases in axillary lymph nodes: clinical relevance of minimal lymph node involvement. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 1;23(7):1379-89. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.094.
Montagna E, Viale G, Rotmensz N, Maisonneuve P, Galimberti V, Luini A, Intra M, Veronesi P, Mazzarol G, Pruneri G, Renne G, Torrisi R, Cardillo A, Cancello G, Goldhirsch A, Colleoni M. Minimal axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer has different prognostic implications according to the staging procedure. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Nov;118(2):385-94. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0446-6. Epub 2009 Jun 27.
Hansen NM, Grube B, Ye X, Turner RR, Brenner RJ, Sim MS, Giuliano AE. Impact of micrometastases in the sentinel node of patients with invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 1;27(28):4679-84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.0686. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
Korn EL, Hunsberger S, Freidlin B, Smith MA, Abrams JS. Preliminary data release for randomized clinical trials of noninferiority: a new proposal. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 20;23(24):5831-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.105. Epub 2005 Jul 18.
Marubini E, Valsecchi MG. Analysing survival data from clinical trials and observational studies. Chichester, England: Wiley; 1995. 331 pp.
Gray RJ. A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Statist 1988; 16: 1141-1154
Jung SH, Kang SJ, McCall LM, Blumenstein B. Sample size computation for two-sample noninferiority log-rank test. J Biopharm Stat. 2005;15(6):969-79. doi: 10.1080/10543400500265736.
Gentilini OD, Botteri E, Sangalli C, Galimberti V, Porpiglia M, Agresti R, Luini A, Viale G, Cassano E, Peradze N, Toesca A, Massari G, Sacchini V, Munzone E, Leonardi MC, Cattadori F, Di Micco R, Esposito E, Sgarella A, Cattaneo S, Busani M, Dessena M, Bianchi A, Cretella E, Ripoll Orts F, Mueller M, Tinterri C, Chahuan Manzur BJ, Benedetto C, Veronesi P; SOUND Trial Group. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy vs No Axillary Surgery in Patients With Small Breast Cancer and Negative Results on Ultrasonography of Axillary Lymph Nodes: The SOUND Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2023 Nov 1;9(11):1557-1564. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.3759.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IEO S637/311
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.