Sentinel Node Vs Observation After Axillary Ultra-souND

NCT ID: NCT02167490

Last Updated: 2024-11-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1560 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2025-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The hypothesis of this trial are that:

* avoiding axillary surgery does not worsen the outcome of patients with small breast cancer the absence of the pathological information on the risk of recurrence given by nodal status is not worsening outcome of these patients
* pre-operative imaging of the axilla can identify patients with clinically relevant nodal burden.

The aims of this prospective randomized study are:

* to verify whether, in presence of a negative preoperative axillary assessment, SLN can be spared
* to verify whether, in presence of a negative preoperative axillary assessment, the decision on adjuvant medical treatment can be taken according only to the biology of the tumour without the prognostic information achieved by SLNB on the nodal status
* to verify whether, in presence of a negative preoperative axillary assessment, the patients' quality of life can be improved by a less invasive surgical procedure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard approach for axillary staging in patients with breast cancer worldwide. The evident trend of breast cancer treatment is going towards minimizing axillary surgery, even in presence of involvement of the sentinel lymph node (SLN). In fact, it is well known that removal of lymph nodes is performed with staging purposes and to improve regional control but not with curative intent. Recent data from a prospective randomized trial which compared axillary dissection vs. no further axillary surgery in presence of positive SLN did not show any difference in term of overall and disease-free survival. Moreover, to date the impact of the prognostic information of axillary lymph node status in the decision-making process is less important than in the past as the adjuvant treatment is more and more tailored on the biological features of the disease rather than on the risk of recurrence.

This is a prospective randomized controlled trial in which patients with small breast cancer (T\<2 cm), with a negative preoperative assessment of the axilla (ultra-sound with FNAC in presence of doubtful findings) will be randomized into two treatment arms:

* SLNB ± axillary dissection
* No axillary surgical staging In the arm 1, no axillary dissection will be performed in case of either negative SLN or in presence of isolated tumour cells or micrometastases. SLNB will be completed by axillary dissection in presence of macrometastases diagnosed in the SLN.

The aims of this prospective randomized study are:

to verify whether, in presence of a negative preoperative axillary assessment, SLN can be spared to verify whether, in presence of a negative preoperative axillary assessment, the decision on adjuvant medical treatment can be taken according only to the biology of the tumour without the prognostic information achieved by SLNB on the nodal status to verify whether, in presence of a negative preoperative axillary assessment, the patients' quality of life can be improved by a less invasive surgical procedure.

Endpoints

The primary endpoint of the study is distant-disease free survival. This endpoint, a proxi of overall survival, will allow to have reliable results in a shorter period of time compared to overall survival.

Secondary endpoints will be the cumulative incidence of distant recurrences, the cumulative incidence of axillary recurrences, the disease free survival (DFS) and the overall survival (OS). Other secondary endpoints are quality of life and evaluation of type of adjuvant treatment administered.

Sample size calculation and statistical considerations

We will consider women who will undergo SLNB as the reference group, and we will test for non-inferiority the group of women not undergoing any treatment in the axilla. For the purpose of sample size calculation, the 5-year DDFS in the reference group is assumed to be 96.5%. Overall, 1560 women (780 per arm) will be enrolled to decide whether the group without treatment of the axilla is no worse than the reference group, given a margin delta of non-inferiority of 2.5% (maximum tolerable 5-years DDFS = 94%). Statistical power and one-sided type I error are set to 80% and 5%, respectively. After 3 years from the start of accrual an interim safety analysis will be performed.

Standard survival analyses and survival analyses with competing events will be performed. Multivariable Cox regression models will be applied to adjust the risk estimates of interest for other variables. The Chi-square test for trend, Chi-square test and the Fisher exact test will be used to evaluate differences in percentages between the two treatment groups, as appropriate. The T-tests will be used to evaluate differences in means for continuous variables.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Early Stage Breast Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1: sentinel node biopsy

Sentinel node biopsy policy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Arm 1: sentinel node biopsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sentinel node biopsy policy

Arm 2: observation

No axillary staging

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Arm 1: sentinel node biopsy

Sentinel node biopsy policy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* breast cancer \<2 cm, and a clinically negative axilla
* any age
* candidates to receive breast conserving surgery + radiotherapy
* negative preoperative assessment of the axilla (ultra-sound with or without FNAC in case one doubtful node is found)
* written informed consent must be signed and dated by the patient and the investigator prior to inclusion.
* patients must be accessible for follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria

* synchronous distant metastases
* previous malignancy
* bilateral breast cancer
* multicentric or multifocal breast cancer
* previous primary systemic therapy
* pregnancy or breastfeeding
* pre-operative diagnosis (cytology or histology) of axillary lymph node metastases
* pre-operative radiological evidence of multiple involved or suspicious nodes
* patients with psychiatric, addictive, or any disorder, which compromises ability to give informed consent for participation in this study.
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

European Institute of Oncology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Oreste D Gentilini, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

European Institute of Oncology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Instituto Oncologico Fundacion Arturo Lopez Perez

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Comprensorio Sanitario

Bolzano, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliera Spedali Civili

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status

Ospedale Oncologico Regionale

Cagliari, , Italy

Site Status

Humanitas Mater Domini

Castellanza, , Italy

Site Status

Ospedale S. Anna

Como, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliera Carlo Poma

Mantova, , Italy

Site Status

European Institute of Oncology

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

AOU Federico II

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Istituto Nazionale Tumori

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Ospedale San Matteo

Pavia, , Italy

Site Status

Ospedale Guglielmo di Saliceto

Piacenza, , Italy

Site Status

Ospedale Fatebenefratelli

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Humanitas Cancer Center

Rozzano, , Italy

Site Status

Ospedale S. Anna

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Universitätsspital Bern Klinik und Poliklinik für Medizinische Onkologie

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Chile Italy Spain Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, Luini A, Zurrida S, Galimberti V, Intra M, Veronesi P, Robertson C, Maisonneuve P, Renne G, De Cicco C, De Lucia F, Gennari R. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 7;349(6):546-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012782.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12904519 (View on PubMed)

Veronesi U, Galimberti V, Paganelli G, Maisonneuve P, Viale G, Orecchia R, Luini A, Intra M, Veronesi P, Caldarella P, Renne G, Rotmensz N, Sangalli C, De Brito Lima L, Tullii M, Zurrida S. Axillary metastases in breast cancer patients with negative sentinel nodes: a follow-up of 3548 cases. Eur J Cancer. 2009 May;45(8):1381-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.041. Epub 2009 Jan 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19128957 (View on PubMed)

Wasif N, Maggard MA, Ko CY, Giuliano AE. Underuse of axillary dissection for the management of sentinel node micrometastases in breast cancer. Arch Surg. 2010 Feb;145(2):161-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.269.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20157084 (View on PubMed)

Galimberti V, Botteri E, Chifu C, Gentilini O, Luini A, Intra M, Baratella P, Sargenti M, Zurrida S, Veronesi P, Rotmensz N, Viale G, Sonzogni A, Colleoni M, Veronesi U. Can we avoid axillary dissection in the micrometastatic sentinel node in breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Feb;131(3):819-25. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1486-2. Epub 2011 Apr 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21468637 (View on PubMed)

Giuliano AE, McCall L, Beitsch P, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz P, Leitch AM, Saha S, Hunt KK, Morrow M, Ballman K. Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2010 Sep;252(3):426-32; discussion 432-3. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f08f32.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20739842 (View on PubMed)

Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz PW, Leitch AM, Saha S, McCall LM, Morrow M. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011 Feb 9;305(6):569-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.90.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21304082 (View on PubMed)

Fisher B, Jeong JH, Anderson S, Bryant J, Fisher ER, Wolmark N. Twenty-five-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation. N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 22;347(8):567-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020128.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12192016 (View on PubMed)

International Breast Cancer Study Group; Rudenstam CM, Zahrieh D, Forbes JF, Crivellari D, Holmberg SB, Rey P, Dent D, Campbell I, Bernhard J, Price KN, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD, Coates AS. Randomized trial comparing axillary clearance versus no axillary clearance in older patients with breast cancer: first results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 10-93. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24(3):337-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.5784. Epub 2005 Dec 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16344321 (View on PubMed)

Veronesi U, Orecchia R, Zurrida S, Galimberti V, Luini A, Veronesi P, Gatti G, D'Aiuto G, Cataliotti L, Paolucci R, Piccolo P, Massaioli N, Sismondi P, Rulli A, Lo Sardo F, Recalcati A, Terribile D, Acerbi A, Rotmensz N, Maisonneuve P. Avoiding axillary dissection in breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial to assess the role of axillary radiotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2005 Mar;16(3):383-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi089. Epub 2005 Jan 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15668261 (View on PubMed)

Goldhirsch A, Ingle JN, Gelber RD, Coates AS, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ; Panel members. Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2009. Ann Oncol. 2009 Aug;20(8):1319-29. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp322. Epub 2009 Jun 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19535820 (View on PubMed)

Colleoni M, Rotmensz N, Peruzzotti G, Maisonneuve P, Mazzarol G, Pruneri G, Luini A, Intra M, Veronesi P, Galimberti V, Torrisi R, Cardillo A, Goldhirsch A, Viale G. Size of breast cancer metastases in axillary lymph nodes: clinical relevance of minimal lymph node involvement. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 1;23(7):1379-89. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.094.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15735114 (View on PubMed)

Montagna E, Viale G, Rotmensz N, Maisonneuve P, Galimberti V, Luini A, Intra M, Veronesi P, Mazzarol G, Pruneri G, Renne G, Torrisi R, Cardillo A, Cancello G, Goldhirsch A, Colleoni M. Minimal axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer has different prognostic implications according to the staging procedure. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Nov;118(2):385-94. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0446-6. Epub 2009 Jun 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19562480 (View on PubMed)

Hansen NM, Grube B, Ye X, Turner RR, Brenner RJ, Sim MS, Giuliano AE. Impact of micrometastases in the sentinel node of patients with invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 1;27(28):4679-84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.0686. Epub 2009 Aug 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19720928 (View on PubMed)

Korn EL, Hunsberger S, Freidlin B, Smith MA, Abrams JS. Preliminary data release for randomized clinical trials of noninferiority: a new proposal. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 20;23(24):5831-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.105. Epub 2005 Jul 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16027441 (View on PubMed)

Marubini E, Valsecchi MG. Analysing survival data from clinical trials and observational studies. Chichester, England: Wiley; 1995. 331 pp.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Gray RJ. A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Statist 1988; 16: 1141-1154

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Jung SH, Kang SJ, McCall LM, Blumenstein B. Sample size computation for two-sample noninferiority log-rank test. J Biopharm Stat. 2005;15(6):969-79. doi: 10.1080/10543400500265736.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16279355 (View on PubMed)

Gentilini OD, Botteri E, Sangalli C, Galimberti V, Porpiglia M, Agresti R, Luini A, Viale G, Cassano E, Peradze N, Toesca A, Massari G, Sacchini V, Munzone E, Leonardi MC, Cattadori F, Di Micco R, Esposito E, Sgarella A, Cattaneo S, Busani M, Dessena M, Bianchi A, Cretella E, Ripoll Orts F, Mueller M, Tinterri C, Chahuan Manzur BJ, Benedetto C, Veronesi P; SOUND Trial Group. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy vs No Axillary Surgery in Patients With Small Breast Cancer and Negative Results on Ultrasonography of Axillary Lymph Nodes: The SOUND Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2023 Nov 1;9(11):1557-1564. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.3759.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37733364 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IEO S637/311

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.