A Registry-Based Cohort Study on the Clinical Outcomes of Spinal Cord Glioma Resection Via the Dorsolateral Sulcus Approach
NCT ID: NCT07066475
Last Updated: 2025-07-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-01-01
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Preliminary clinical observations suggest that the dorsolateral sulcus approach may offer superior preservation of neurological function and quality of life. However, due to limited research evaluating the safety and efficacy of different surgical routes, the traditional posterior median sulcus approach remains widely used.
This single-center, registry-based cohort study aims to compare the outcomes of spinal cord glioma resection via the dorsolateral sulcus approach versus the posterior median sulcus approach. Patients with laterally located tumors undergoing surgical treatment, classified according to the 2021 WHO criteria, will be included. Neurological function scores and quality-of-life assessments will be used to evaluate prognosis and survival, in order to determine the optimal surgical approach for spinal cord glioma resection.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Natural History of Patients With Brain and Spinal Cord Tumors
NCT00009035
Research on the Safety and Efficacy of Blocking Dural Blood Supply in Glioblastoma Patients
NCT05990556
Study About the Validity of MRS-guided Resection on Prognosis High-grade Glioma Gliomas
NCT02795364
Natural History of and Specimen Banking for People With Tumors of the Central Nervous System
NCT02851706
Microsurgical Resection of Intramedullary Spinal Cord Metastases
NCT06042946
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The traditional posterior median sulcus (PMS) approach provides direct midline access for tumor removal but carries a considerable risk of damage to central neural tracts. The dorsolateral sulcus (DLS) approach offers an alternative route for laterally located tumors, potentially sparing critical midline structures and improving functional outcomes.
This single-center, registry-based cohort study aims to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of spinal cord glioma resections performed via the DLS and PMS approaches. Patients will be enrolled based on eligibility criteria including lateralized tumor growth confirmed by imaging and histopathology, in accordance with the 2021 WHO classification of CNS tumors.
Primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed using validated clinical scales, including:
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain assessment McCormick Functional Grading Scale Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) Score for spinal cord function SF-36 Health Survey for quality of life evaluation Functional assessment of posterior column integrity Outcome assessments will be performed at five scheduled time points: preoperatively, and postoperatively at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and at the last follow-up visit. The study will evaluate neurological recovery, extent of resection, tumor recurrence, postoperative complications, and overall survival. This research aims to identify the optimal surgical approach that maximizes tumor resection while preserving neurological function in patients with spinal cord gliomas.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
DLS Group
Patients who underwent tumor resection through the dorsolateral sulcus approach
No interventions assigned to this group
PMS Group
Patients who underwent tumor resection through the posterior median sulcus approach
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Undergoing surgical resection of spinal cord tumor
3. Histopathological diagnosis of spinal cord glioma based on routine pathological examination
4. Availability of complete clinical data and willingness to participate in follow-up
5. Informed consent obtained from the patient and/or legal guardians or immediate family members
Exclusion Criteria
2. Receipt of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or anti-tumor biological therapy within 1 month prior to enrollment
3. Receipt of immunotherapy within 3 months prior to enrollment
4. Participation in other clinical trials within 3 months prior to enrollment
5. History of severe allergic reactions or known allergy-prone constitution
6. Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or individuals of childbearing potential not using adequate contraception
7. Presence of other severe medical conditions or uncontrolled infections
8. History of drug abuse, substance misuse, chronic alcoholism, or HIV infection
9. Uncontrolled epileptic seizures or psychiatric disorders resulting in loss of self-control
3 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Beijing Tiantan Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KY2025-143-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.