Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
1204 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-01-01
2023-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Role of the Tumor Microenvironment in Aggressive Meningiomas
NCT05821790
Evaluation of the Correlation Between Molecular Phenotype and Radiological Signature (by PET-scanner and MRI) of Incident WHO II and III Grade Gliomas.
NCT04461002
Multicenter Evaluation in Patients With MEningiomas of the Response to Treatment With 177LUTEtium-oxodotreotide
NCT06255249
MEningioma Detection Using Non Contrast MRI TecHniquEs
NCT04113408
Study of Tissue Samples From Patients With Glioma or Other Brain Tumors
NCT00967200
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Main objective: to assess the impact of postoperative radiotherapy after GIIM surgery on overall survival (OS) in a population-setting study.
Secondary objectives (for GIIM and GIIIM):
* Evaluate the recurrence/progression free survival (PFS), volumetric velocity of the tumor growth (VVTG) after surgery and other treatment.
* Evaluate long term HRQoL.
* Evaluate the relevance and impact of histopathological review in a population setting.
* Looking for prognostic (clinical, radiological and biological) factors.
* Proposing therapeutic decision trees in general or for certain categories of patients.
* Identifying relevant cases to conduct further studies to identify new therapeutic targets.
* Perspectives for the TUCERA network to help design specific prospective projects.
* Looking for disparities in care management, survival and HRQoL in the various regions of France.
Design of the study: nationwide population-based study analysis and patterns of care/quality of care study, for all cases of incident GIIM and GIIIM operated in Metropolitan France during the 2007-2010 period.
The methodology used is based on a multidisciplinary national network already established by the French Brain Tumor DataBase (FBTDB), with the active participation of societies involved in the French neuro-oncology and the "Inter Groupe Coopérateur en Neuro-Oncologie", labeled by the French National Cancer Institute.
The FBTDB has already identified all incident cases of GIIM (n=1046) and GIIIM (n=158) operated in Metropolitan France from 2007 to 2010.
The study proposed is a retrospective study based on the medical charts of all these patients.
Furthermore, for all surviving patients not lost to follow-up, the follow-up consultations will include a prospective HRQoL evaluation (cutoff date: 2019/11/30).
It will be conducted a systematic pathological review (with eventually additional biological work-up), and a study of prognostic factors (clinical, radiological, biological), treatments administered, OS, PFS.
Primary endpoint: OS. The statistical analysis (to answer to the main question) will concern all GIIM only.
Hypothesis:
Experimental group: Group of GIIM with postoperative radiotherapy (n=314). Control group: Group of GIIM with postoperative follow-up only (n=732). With a bilateral type I error of 5% (two-sided) and a statistical power of 80% we will be able to demonstrate that postoperative radiotherapy will be associated with a Hazard ratio (mortality risk) of 0.80.
Secondary endpoints (for GIIM and GIIIM):
* PFS, VVTG after surgery and other treatment.
* HRQoL will be assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30, BN20 questionnaires, Europol EQ5D, and with a questionnaire on professional and social activities (HRQoL will be assessed for all patients alive, every six months, since inclusion, for an 18-month period).
* Mapping between HRQoL questionnaires.
* Concordance/discordance analysis between the initial histological diagnosis and the diagnosis of the pathological review.
* Conduct an inventory of cryopreserved material available for translational research.
It is expected to:
* Define subgroups of patients, according to prognostic factors, which would benefit from postoperative radiotherapy in GIIM.
* Define subgroups of patients, according to their prognostic factors, which would benefit from not having postoperative radiotherapy in GIIM.
* Propose personalized therapeutic attitudes according to prognostic factors (clinical, radiological, and biological) in general, but also for specific categories of patients such as elderly subjects.
* Define subgroups of GIIM and GIIIM that will justify conducting trials in the framework of the TUCERA network.
* Evaluate in population settings, the relevance and impact of a systematic histopathological review.
* Develop HRQoL evaluation in population settings.
* Acquire better knowledge of prognostic factors (clinical, radiological and biological) for GIIM and GIIIM, their natural history, and maybe help determine elements able to differentiate GIIM that will progress to GIIIM, from those that will remain GIIM.
* Build a clinical-biological database to identify and/or develop new therapeutic targets in GIIM and GIIIM.
* Evaluate potential disparities in terms of survival and HRQoL in the different French regions, and if some disparities are found, look for eventual causes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
* Non-operated meningioma patient
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
OTHER
University Hospital, Montpellier
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
LUC BAUCHET, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
UH MONTPELLIER
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Uh Montpellier
Montpellier, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Frank BONNETAIN
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UF9759
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.