A Nomogram for Predicting the Diagnosis of Central Malignant Tumors Based on Preoperative Clinical Characteristics and Laboratory Indicators:
NCT ID: NCT06914700
Last Updated: 2025-04-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
800 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-09-01
2024-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Whole-Brain Tumor Burden Metrics with Inflammatory and Molecular Markers to Predict Postoperative Neurocognitive Decline in Glioma
NCT06885333
Hierarchical Diagnosis for Adult Diffuse Glioma Based on Deep Learning
NCT05624736
Combing a Deep Learning-Based Radiomics With Liquid Biopsy for Preoperative and Non-invasive Diagnosis of Glioma
NCT05536024
Treatment Response and Prognosis in Glioma Patients: Q Cell and Its Biological Characteristics
NCT02047058
Natural History of Brain Function, Quality of Life, and Seizure Control in Patients With Brain Tumor Who Have Undergone Surgery
NCT01417507
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
the Ethics Review Committee of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital granted ethical approval for this study (KY-Z-2022-231-01). This retrospective cohort study included 127 patients with newly diagnosed primary central nervous system diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PCNSL) and 586 patients with newly diagnosed glioma, treated at the Department of Neurosurgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, between 2016 and 2024. Patients included in this study met the following criteria: (1) HIV-seronegative status; (2) no history of immunosuppression or organ transplantation; (3) availability of all clinical indicators prior to the first surgery; (4) sufficient clinical and data availability. All participants were informed of the study's purpose and provided signed informed consent prior to participation, in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.
Basic demographic and clinical data were collected prior to initial diagnosis and first surgical treatment. Demographic data included age and sex, while clinical data encompassed peripheral white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NEUT1), lymphocyte ratio (LYMPH1), neutrophil count (NEUT), lymphocyte count (LYMPH), monocyte count (MONO), international normalized ratio (INR), prothrombin time (PT) and albumin.
Patients were randomly assigned to training and validation cohorts in a 7:3 ratio for both diagnostic models, comprising 713 and 586 patients, respectively. No significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics were observed between the training and validation sets. To identify potential predictors, LASSO regression analysis was performed on the training set, effectively eliminating several irrelevant or multicollinear independent variables to reduce dimensionality. Subsequently, multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to determine the characteristic variables. Finally, a nomogram was constructed based on the training set and validated in the validation set.
The predictive performance of the model was assessed and validated using machine learning and deep learning techniques. Model discrimination was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was employed to assess the model's net benefit and clinical utility.
Categorical variables were described using frequencies and percentages. Chi-squared tests or t-tests were used to compare data between the two cohorts. A LASSO regression model was applied to mitigate potential multicollinearity. All variables with complete data in the training cohort were included in the LASSO regression analysis using the "glmnet" package in R software. The model achieved optimal performance at Lambda.min, thus identifying candidate variables. Subsequently, multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors associated with the binary outcome. These factors were then integrated to construct a nomogram prediction model using the "rms" package in R software. Seven additional models-logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, support vector machine (SVM), neural network, XGBoost, and LightGBM-were constructed using the "caret" package, and decision curves were generated using the "rmda" package. All statistical analyses were performed using R software version 4.4.2, and a p-value \< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PCNSL
The postoperative pathological result is PCNSL
No interventions assigned to this group
Glioma
The postoperative pathological result is Glioma
No interventions assigned to this group
GBM
The postoperative pathological result is GBM
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Zhoudong
Department Head
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GDPH-PG
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.