Validity and Reliability Evaluation of the PRO-CTCAE for Adult-type Diffuse Gliomas Patients in Chinese Population
NCT ID: NCT05486923
Last Updated: 2025-07-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
450 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-09-19
2025-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study focuses on Chinese adult-type diffuse glioma patients. First, based on information queries, expert consultation research, online Delphi survey, and survey data analysis, the investigators will determine the questionnaire terms for PRO-CTCAE™ for adult-type diffuse gliomas patients. In the next stage, a prospective, multi-center, real-world study to assess the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the customized PRO-CTCAE™ for adult-type diffuse gliomas patients in Chinese population will be launched (VERONICA).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Nomogram for Predicting the Diagnosis of Central Malignant Tumors Based on Preoperative Clinical Characteristics and Laboratory Indicators:
NCT06914700
Treatment Response and Prognosis in Glioma Patients: Q Cell and Its Biological Characteristics
NCT02047058
Radiogenomics in Glioblastoma: Correlation Between Multiparametric Imaging Biomarkers and Genetic Biomarkers
NCT05541042
Whole-Brain Tumor Burden Metrics with Inflammatory and Molecular Markers to Predict Postoperative Neurocognitive Decline in Glioma
NCT06885333
A Prospective Cohort to Study the Effect of Temozolomide on IDH Mutational Low Grade Gliomas
NCT02209428
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A total of 16 experts (13 neurosurgeons, 2 radiotherapists, 1 psychiatrist) from 14 medical centers in China were invited to participate in a consensus-seeking 2-round online Delphi survey. Participants rated the level of their agreement with each symptom term likely to occur during adult diffuse gliomas treatment on a 5-point Likert scale. Terms not reaching consensus over the first round were modified in the second rounds. Consensus was defined as content validity index (CVI) \>0.78，coefficient of variation (CV)\< 0.35 and average Likert score \>3.00.
Second, a prospective, multi-center, real-world study would be performed to assess the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the customized PRO-CTCAE™ for adult diffuse glioma patients in Chinese population.
This study is an observational, prospective, open-label clinical study. It is estimated that 450 adult diffuse glioma patients will be recruited from 17 research centers, and participants will be included in the cohort in chronological order until the target number of cases is reached. The study is expected to be completed within 2 years. In this study, KPS will be used as the anchor point to compare two groups of patients(KPS≤70 and KPS\>70, patients with KPS≤70 is not less than 15%).
The investigators do not intervene in the current treatment plan for patients, only observe the treatment plan, and conduct regular questionnaires on the patients: since the patients are enrolled (within 42 days after surgery), six basic follow-ups and long-term follow-ups will be carried out. The whole follow-ups will last for two years.
The follow-up contents include:
Filled out by doctors: demographic information, diagnosis information, anti-tumor treatment (in the past 2 weeks), special treatment (in the past 2 weeks, including but not limited to dehydration drugs and psychotropic drugs, etc.), CTCAE v5.0 (only including the items corresponding to PRO-CTCAE™), KPS.
Filled out by patients: customized PRO-CTCAETM, QLQ-C30, GIC.
Data will be collected using EDC system to ensure patient privacy and data integrity.
The statistical analysis methods:
For the customized PRO-CTCAE™, quantitatively assign each item and its answers (F, S, A, I, P), and then use statistical methods to assess the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the customized PRO-CTCAE™ for adult diffuse glioma patients in Chinese population.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
KPS less than 70
The patients in this group have Karnofsky performance Status less than 70，and the proportion of them is not less than 15%.
Patients need regular follow-up surveys within 2 years after the date of surgery.
No interventions assigned to this group
KPS more than 70
The patients in this group have Karnofsky performance Status more than 70. Patients need regular follow-up surveys within 2 years after the date of surgery.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. For newly diagnosed patients, the patient has not received the first non-surgical treatment.
3. For recurrent patients, the patient has not received the first non-surgical treatment after the recurrence.
4. 18 to 85 years old.
5. No significant cognitive impairment based on researchers' judgment.
6. Patients can use mobile phones or computers on their own or with the help of others, read and understand Chinese, at least with primary school culture.
7. Patients are undergoing anti-tumor treatment and continue to receive treatment within the next 28 days.
8. Patients sign written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Since the diagnosis, the patient has undergone non-surgical treatment.
3. Patients fail to complete the questionnaire within 42 days of signing informed consent.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Huashan Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jinsong Wu
Chief Physician, Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jinsong Wu, Ph.D. & M.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Huashan Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Xuan Wu Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, China
Jiangsu People's Hospital
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Xijing Hospital
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
Department of Neurologic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Changhai Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
East Hospital Affiliated To Tongji University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
Kunming, Yunnan, China
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Armstrong TS, Dirven L, Arons D, Bates A, Chang SM, Coens C, Espinasse C, Gilbert MR, Jenkinson D, Kluetz P, Mendoza T, Rubinstein L, Sul J, Weller M, Wen PY, van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJB. Glioma patient-reported outcome assessment in clinical care and research: a Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology collaborative report. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):e97-e103. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30796-X.
Basch E, Geoghegan C, Coons SJ, Gnanasakthy A, Slagle AF, Papadopoulos EJ, Kluetz PG. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Drug Development and US Regulatory Review: Perspectives From Industry, the Food and Drug Administration, and the Patient. JAMA Oncol. 2015 Jun;1(3):375-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0530.
Cagney DN, Sul J, Huang RY, Ligon KL, Wen PY, Alexander BM. The FDA NIH Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools (BEST) resource in neuro-oncology. Neuro Oncol. 2018 Aug 2;20(9):1162-1172. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox242.
Armstrong TS, Wefel JS, Wang M, Gilbert MR, Won M, Bottomley A, Mendoza TR, Coens C, Werner-Wasik M, Brachman DG, Choucair AK, Mehta M. Net clinical benefit analysis of radiation therapy oncology group 0525: a phase III trial comparing conventional adjuvant temozolomide with dose-intensive temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 10;31(32):4076-84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.6067. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
Gilbert MR, Dignam JJ, Armstrong TS, Wefel JS, Blumenthal DT, Vogelbaum MA, Colman H, Chakravarti A, Pugh S, Won M, Jeraj R, Brown PD, Jaeckle KA, Schiff D, Stieber VW, Brachman DG, Werner-Wasik M, Tremont-Lukats IW, Sulman EP, Aldape KD, Curran WJ Jr, Mehta MP. A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20;370(8):699-708. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1308573.
Armstrong TS, Bishof AM, Brown PD, Klein M, Taphoorn MJ, Theodore-Oklota C. Determining priority signs and symptoms for use as clinical outcomes assessments in trials including patients with malignant gliomas: Panel 1 Report. Neuro Oncol. 2016 Mar;18 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii1-ii12. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov267.
Yeung AR, Pugh SL, Klopp AH, Gil KM, Wenzel L, Westin SN, Gaffney DK, Small W Jr, Thompson S, Doncals DE, Cantuaria GHC, Yaremko BP, Chang A, Kundapur V, Mohan DS, Haas ML, Kim YB, Ferguson CL, Deshmukh S, Bruner DW, Kachnic LA. Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (RT) Compared With Standard RT: A Report From the NRG Oncology RTOG 1203 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 20;38(15):1685-1692. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02381. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
Basch E, Deal AM, Kris MG, Scher HI, Hudis CA, Sabbatini P, Rogak L, Bennett AV, Dueck AC, Atkinson TM, Chou JF, Dulko D, Sit L, Barz A, Novotny P, Fruscione M, Sloan JA, Schrag D. Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 20;34(6):557-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0830. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
Basch E, Reeve BB, Mitchell SA, Clauser SB, Minasian LM, Dueck AC, Mendoza TR, Hay J, Atkinson TM, Abernethy AP, Bruner DW, Cleeland CS, Sloan JA, Chilukuri R, Baumgartner P, Denicoff A, St Germain D, O'Mara AM, Chen A, Kelaghan J, Bennett AV, Sit L, Rogak L, Barz A, Paul DB, Schrag D. Development of the National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Sep 29;106(9):dju244. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju244. Print 2014 Sep.
Dueck AC, Mendoza TR, Mitchell SA, Reeve BB, Castro KM, Rogak LJ, Atkinson TM, Bennett AV, Denicoff AM, O'Mara AM, Li Y, Clauser SB, Bryant DM, Bearden JD 3rd, Gillis TA, Harness JK, Siegel RD, Paul DB, Cleeland CS, Schrag D, Sloan JA, Abernethy AP, Bruner DW, Minasian LM, Basch E; National Cancer Institute PRO-CTCAE Study Group. Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1051-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2639.
Trask PC, Dueck AC, Piault E, Campbell A. Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events: Methods for item selection in industry-sponsored oncology clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2018 Dec;15(6):616-623. doi: 10.1177/1740774518799985. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KY2022-681
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.