Spanish Registry of Direct Cholangiopancreatoscopy by Single Operator
NCT ID: NCT07064447
Last Updated: 2025-07-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
260 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-09-01
2026-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
However, there are situations in which these procedures face limitations, such as the evaluation of indeterminate ductal strictures or the management of complex choledocholithiasis.
Direct visualization of the biliary and pancreatic ducts has proven to be a useful and effective alternative in such cases. It also has a safety profile comparable to conventional ERCP, with only a slight increase in the incidence of adverse events.
Nevertheless, due to the associated increase in costs, most centers have adopted a stepwise approach in their diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms, using this technique only after multiple ERCPs.
Although the evidence is still limited, recent studies suggest that early use of direct cholangiopancreatoscopy could be a cost-effective strategy due to its increased efficacy.
In this regard, collecting data on direct cholangiopancreatoscopy would be of interest to generate robust conclusions on cost-effectiveness in routine clinical practice.
This study aims to objectively assess the real-world use of direct cholangiopancreatoscopy in our setting, with the goal of confirming technical aspects, efficacy, and safety, and ultimately conducting cost-effectiveness evaluations to determine the optimal point in the algorithm at which this technique should be introduced.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Spanish Registry of Quality Indicators and Adverse Events of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
NCT06670547
Cholangioscopic Classification of Bile Duct Lesions
NCT02794987
Cholangioscopy or Conventional Techniques for Indeterminate Biliary Stenosis
NCT04840537
Endoscopic Ultrasonography Guided Biliary Drainage
NCT03195075
Endoscopic Biliary Drainage in Malignant High Grade Biliary Stricture
NCT03530527
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
However, there are certain situations in which these procedures face limitations, whether due to the characteristics of the pathology itself or the technique's constraints. This is the case, for example, in the evaluation of indeterminate ductal strictures or the management of complex choledocholithiasis, where the diagnostic or therapeutic yield is often suboptimal.
Direct visualization of the biliary and pancreatic ducts has been shown to be a useful and effective alternative in such scenarios. Its safety profile is similar to that of conventional ERCP, with only a slight increase in the incidence of adverse events.
Despite this, the increased costs associated with this technique have led most centers to adopt a stepwise approach in their clinical algorithms. In general, conventional ERCP is used initially, and direct cholangiopancreatoscopy is only considered after several failed ERCPs.
While the economic evidence remains limited, recent studies suggest that early implementation of this technique could be a cost-effective solution, due to its high efficacy and the potential reduction in the total number of procedures required.
In this context, collecting data on the use of direct cholangiopancreatoscopy would be valuable to generate robust conclusions regarding the real-world efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the technique in routine clinical practice data that is currently lacking.
This study aims to objectively assess the real-world use of direct cholangiopancreatoscopy in our setting, to confirm technical, efficacy, and safety data for both its diagnostic and therapeutic indications, and ultimately to perform cost-effectiveness analyses to help determine the optimal point within the clinical algorithm at which this technique should be introduced.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with biliopancreatic pathology undergoing cholangiopancreatoscopy
Patients with biliopancreatic pathology who undergo cholangiopancreatoscopy, are over 18 years of age, and have signed the informed consent
Cholangiopancreatoscopy
Direct cholangiopancreatoscopy by single operator
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cholangiopancreatoscopy
Direct cholangiopancreatoscopy by single operator
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Be over 18 years of age.
* Provide signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Lack of availability of signed informed consent.
* Impossibility of follow-up.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy
OTHER
Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eloi Nuñez-Garcia, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Alrajhi S, Barkun A, Adam V, Callichurn K, Martel M, Brewer O, Khashab MA, Forbes N, Almadi MA, Chen YI. Early cholangioscopy-assisted electrohydraulic lithotripsy in difficult biliary stones is cost-effective. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul 23;14:17562848211031388. doi: 10.1177/17562848211031388. eCollection 2021.
Sljivic I, Trasolini R, Donnellan F. Cost-effective analysis of preliminary single-operator cholangioscopy for management of difficult biliary stones. Endosc Int Open. 2022 Sep 14;10(9):E1193-E1200. doi: 10.1055/a-1873-0884. eCollection 2022 Sep.
Deprez PH, Garces Duran R, Moreels T, Furneri G, Demma F, Verbeke L, Van der Merwe SW, Laleman W. The economic impact of using single-operator cholangioscopy for the treatment of difficult bile duct stones and diagnosis of indeterminate bile duct strictures. Endoscopy. 2018 Feb;50(2):109-118. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-121268. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
Wen LJ, Chen JH, Xu HJ, Yu Q, Liu K. Efficacy and Safety of Digital Single-Operator Cholangioscopy in the Diagnosis of Indeterminate Biliary Strictures by Targeted Biopsies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Sep 2;10(9):666. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090666.
Turowski F, Hugle U, Dormann A, Bechtler M, Jakobs R, Gottschalk U, Notzel E, Hartmann D, Lorenz A, Kolligs F, Veltzke-Schlieker W, Adler A, Becker O, Wiedenmann B, Burgel N, Troger H, Schumann M, Daum S, Siegmund B, Bojarski C. Diagnostic and therapeutic single-operator cholangiopancreatoscopy with SpyGlassDS: results of a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2018 Sep;32(9):3981-3988. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6141-0. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
Korrapati P, Ciolino J, Wani S, Shah J, Watson R, Muthusamy VR, Klapman J, Komanduri S. The efficacy of peroral cholangioscopy for difficult bile duct stones and indeterminate strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2016 Mar;4(3):E263-75. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-100194. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
Kim HJ, Choi HS, Park JH, Park DI, Cho YK, Sohn CI, Jeon WK, Kim BI, Choi SH. Factors influencing the technical difficulty of endoscopic clearance of bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Dec;66(6):1154-60. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.04.033. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
Navaneethan U, Njei B, Lourdusamy V, Konjeti R, Vargo JJ, Parsi MA. Comparative effectiveness of biliary brush cytology and intraductal biopsy for detection of malignant biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):168-76. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.017. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pl-24-022
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.