Comparison of ESWL Alone and ESWL + Endoscopy for Painful Chronic Pancreatitis

NCT ID: NCT00133835

Last Updated: 2022-03-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1998-03-31

Study Completion Date

2022-02-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Endoscopy is an established method of treatment for painful obstructive calcified pancreatitis. It involves the disintegration of calcifications using extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) followed by endoscopic removal of stone fragments possibly associated with stent insertion. A pilot study suggests that ESWL alone relieves pain in calcified chronic pancreatitis (CP). The aim of this study is to compare both techniques in a randomized controlled trial.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Endoscopic drainage of the main pancreatic duct is an established method of treatment of painful obstructive calcified chronic pancreatitis (CP). It involves disintegration of calcifications using extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) followed by endoscopic removal of stone fragments, possibly associated with stent insertion. A pilot study suggests that ESWL alone in calcified CP is followed by spontaneous elimination of stone fragments and pain relief, without sphincterotomy. After ESWL alone, the exocrine function was found to return to normal values in some cases. Potential benefits include lower costs and morbidity as well as wider availability compared to endoscopic techniques.

The primary outcome of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the relapse of pain at 2 years after treatment with ESWL alone or endoscopic treatment, consisting of ESWL followed by endoscopic stone extraction. Secondary outcomes include a comparison of technical results (as assessed by abdominal CT Scan 1 week after the last intervention and secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance at 1 month), complication rates, and treatment-related costs in both groups.

Patients are eligible to participate in the study according to the following criteria:

Inclusion criteria :

* painful chronic pancreatitis (abdominal pain attack during the preceding 12 months);
* at least 1 calcified stone greater than 4 mm in one of its axes in the cephalic or corporeal portion of the main pancreatic duct with upstream duct dilation;
* written informed consent obtained from the patient.

Exclusion criteria:

* history of treatment of the pancreas using ESWL, endoscopy, or surgery;
* pancreatic collection greater than 2 cm in diameter at magnetic resonance or CT Scan;
* alkaline phosphatase levels greater than twice the upper limit of normal values or signs of cholangitis;
* age below 18 years;
* pregnancy or lactation.

Pretherapeutic work-up will include detailed medical history (including date of the first episode of typical abdominal pain, date of diagnosis of CP, number of episodes of pain during the last year, alcohol intake, pain continuous or intermittent during the last episode, medication, intensity of the last episode of pain on a 10-point scale as previously described), blood chemistry, stool sampling (for elastase measurement), triolein breath test, plain abdominal film taken in four classical positions (left anterior oblique, right anterior oblique, lateral, and supine), CT Scan without contrast medium injection, and secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (S-MRCP).

After informed consent of the referring physician has been obtained, patients will be asked to participate in the study. If the patient accepts, after oral and written consent, he (or she) will be randomized to the ESWL or endoscopy group by opening an opaque sealed envelope numbered according to a table of random numbers.

ESWL will be performed in all patients using a electromagnetic lithotriptor as previously described. Shock-waves will be focused on the obstructing stones (if multiple stones are present, those responsible for MPD obstruction will be identified by comparing plain abdominal film, CT Scan and S-MRCP). ESWL sessions will be repeated if necessary, until stone fragmentation is obtained, as confirmed by abdominal plain film centered on the targeted area of the pancreas. At this time, treatment will be considered terminated in the ESWL group, patients in the endoscopy group will undergo endoscopy immediately, for endoscopic extraction of stone fragments possibly associated to stent insertion according to previously published criteria and techniques.

Cross-over: in the ESWL group, if no elimination of the fragments is observed one week after the last ESWL, endoscopic drainage of the main pancreatic duct will be carried out at this time in case of continuous pain. For patients without continuous pain, delayed spontaneous elimination of the fragments will be sought by CT Scan and S-MRCP 2 months after the last ESWL. Endoscopic drainage of the main pancreatic duct will be proposed during follow-up only to the patients presenting a painful attack of CP.

Follow-up will consist of clinical examination 1 month after treatment and every 6 months thereafter. Data collected will include pain relapses, ESWL, endoscopic and surgical procedures, weight change, plus any other seemingly unrelated medical treatments. In addition to this, a S-MRCP will be performed 1 month after treatment. Triolein breath test will be performed at 1 month and 1 year. Sampling of stools (for elastase measurement) will be obtained every year.

Costs will be calculated starting on the day of first treatment as previously described. Costs not directly related to the treatment of pain or of procedure-related complications (e.g., diabetes) will be disregarded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopic drainage of the main pancreatic duct

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Painful chronic pancreatitis (\>1 abdominal pain attack during the preceding 12 months)
* At least 1 calcified stone greater than 4 mm in one of its axes in the cephalic or corporeal portion of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) with upstream duct dilation
* Written informed consent obtained from the patient

Exclusion Criteria

* History of treatment of the pancreas using ESWL, endoscopy, or surgery
* Pancreatic collection greater than 2 cm in diameter at magnetic resonance or CT scan
* Alkaline phosphatase levels greater than twice the upper limit of normal values or signs of cholangitis
* Age below 18 years
* Pregnancy or lactation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Erasme University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jean-Marc Dumonceau

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Geneva

Jacques Devière

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Erasme University Hospital

Guido Costamagna

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Catholic University of Roma

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatopancretology; Erasme University Hospital

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Department of Surgery, Catholic University

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

97.187

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Guidewire Management in ERCP
NCT05219123 COMPLETED