Cholangioscopy or Conventional Techniques for Indeterminate Biliary Stenosis
NCT ID: NCT04840537
Last Updated: 2021-04-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-12-26
2022-12-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main objective is to compare two strategies for exploring indeterminate biliary stenosis (1st vs. 2nd line retrograde cholangioscopy) in terms of diagnostic performance. The secondary objectives are to compare the same two strategies in terms of effectiveness, side effects and cost-effectiveness.
The primary outcome measure is the diagnostic yield (performance) of the initial investigation of indeterminate biliary stenosis: cytological brushing followed by cholangioscopy in case of failure (control group) or cholangioscopy from the start (study group).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Primary Cholangioscopy Versus ERCP in the Diagnosis of Biliary Strictures
NCT04010734
Optimizing the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Suspected Choledocholithiasis
NCT05141916
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Based Sampling of Indeterminate Bile Duct Strictures
NCT01580709
Prospective Evaluation of Residual Bile Duct Stone by Peroral Cholangioscopy After Conventional ERCP
NCT03482375
Factors Associated With Increased Risk of Bacteremia and Cholangitis in ERCP With Cholangioscopy
NCT02543957
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
cytological brushing followed by cholangioscopy in case of failure
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with cholangioscopy in the first procedure of ERCP
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with cholangioscopy in the first procedure for exploration of an indeterminate biliary stenosis and biliary drainage
cholangioscopy from the start
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with cholangioscopy in the first procedure of ERCP
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with cholangioscopy in the first procedure for exploration of an indeterminate biliary stenosis and biliary drainage
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with cholangioscopy in the first procedure of ERCP
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with cholangioscopy in the first procedure for exploration of an indeterminate biliary stenosis and biliary drainage
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presence of clinical jaundice and / or biological cholestasis (GGT\> 3N)
* Absence of visible mass near the biliary stenosis after initial morphological assessment by abdominal CT scan, MRI with biliary sequences.
* Endoscopic ultrasound performed and not having allowed the acquisition of material of diagnostic interest by guided puncture of the lesion.
* No history of ERCP in the 6 months preceding inclusion and no biliary prosthesis (plastic or metal) in place at the time of inclusion
* Collegial validation of the need for a formal diagnosis of indeterminate biliary stenosis in order to guide therapeutic management
* Patients aged 18 to 85
* Patient who gave his consent to participate in the study
* No contraindication to anesthesia (ASA 1, 2,3)
* Patient affiliated to a social security scheme (beneficiary or beneficiary)
* Absence of pregnancy and current contraception in women of childbearing age
Exclusion Criteria
* Very strong presumption of the etiological diagnosis of biliary stenosis given the history (history, background): i.e. liver surgery, cholecystectomy, autoimmunity
* History of ERCP and / or percutaneous biliary drainage in the 6 months preceding inclusion
* Presence of a plastic or metal biliary prosthesis in place at the time of inclusion
* History of cephalic duodeno-pancreatectomy or hepatico-jejunal anastomosis
* Non-passable stenosis of the main bile duct
* Severe coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia \<75,000 G / L, treatment with clopidogrel cannot be interrupted even temporarily
* Anesthetic contraindication (ASA 4)
* Inability to obtain informed consent
* person deprived of liberty
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Frederic PRAT, MD, PhD
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Frederic PRAT, MD, PhD
Principal Investagator, Medical Doctor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hôpital Beaujon
Clichy, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SFED 131
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.