Cholangioscopy or Conventional Techniques for Indeterminate Biliary Stenosis

NCT ID: NCT04840537

Last Updated: 2021-04-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-12-26

Study Completion Date

2022-12-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Biliary stenosis not associated with a mass is difficult to diagnose with certainty. The diagnosis is usually based on a first-line cytological study of biliary brushing, which allows a diagnosis in 30 to 50% of cases. In the event of negativity, it is then possible to perform a cholangioscopy in a second step, which allows better sensitivity by performing biopsies. Performing cholangioscopy from the start could potentially save time and avoid disturbances associated with intermediate biliary stenting.

The main objective is to compare two strategies for exploring indeterminate biliary stenosis (1st vs. 2nd line retrograde cholangioscopy) in terms of diagnostic performance. The secondary objectives are to compare the same two strategies in terms of effectiveness, side effects and cost-effectiveness.

The primary outcome measure is the diagnostic yield (performance) of the initial investigation of indeterminate biliary stenosis: cytological brushing followed by cholangioscopy in case of failure (control group) or cholangioscopy from the start (study group).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malignant Biliary Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

cytological brushing followed by cholangioscopy in case of failure

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with cholangioscopy in the first procedure of ERCP

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with cholangioscopy in the first procedure for exploration of an indeterminate biliary stenosis and biliary drainage

cholangioscopy from the start

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with cholangioscopy in the first procedure of ERCP

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with cholangioscopy in the first procedure for exploration of an indeterminate biliary stenosis and biliary drainage

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with cholangioscopy in the first procedure of ERCP

endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with cholangioscopy in the first procedure for exploration of an indeterminate biliary stenosis and biliary drainage

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Presence of intra- or extrahepatic biliary stenosis, involving the main bile ducts: common hepatic duct, right and left hepatic ducts
* Presence of clinical jaundice and / or biological cholestasis (GGT\> 3N)
* Absence of visible mass near the biliary stenosis after initial morphological assessment by abdominal CT scan, MRI with biliary sequences.
* Endoscopic ultrasound performed and not having allowed the acquisition of material of diagnostic interest by guided puncture of the lesion.
* No history of ERCP in the 6 months preceding inclusion and no biliary prosthesis (plastic or metal) in place at the time of inclusion
* Collegial validation of the need for a formal diagnosis of indeterminate biliary stenosis in order to guide therapeutic management
* Patients aged 18 to 85
* Patient who gave his consent to participate in the study
* No contraindication to anesthesia (ASA 1, 2,3)
* Patient affiliated to a social security scheme (beneficiary or beneficiary)
* Absence of pregnancy and current contraception in women of childbearing age

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of a manifest tissue mass in relation to the biliary stenosis on CT and / or MRI imaging.
* Very strong presumption of the etiological diagnosis of biliary stenosis given the history (history, background): i.e. liver surgery, cholecystectomy, autoimmunity
* History of ERCP and / or percutaneous biliary drainage in the 6 months preceding inclusion
* Presence of a plastic or metal biliary prosthesis in place at the time of inclusion
* History of cephalic duodeno-pancreatectomy or hepatico-jejunal anastomosis
* Non-passable stenosis of the main bile duct
* Severe coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia \<75,000 G / L, treatment with clopidogrel cannot be interrupted even temporarily
* Anesthetic contraindication (ASA 4)
* Inability to obtain informed consent
* person deprived of liberty
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Frederic PRAT, MD, PhD

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Frederic PRAT, MD, PhD

Principal Investagator, Medical Doctor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hôpital Beaujon

Clichy, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Frederic Prat, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+33 (0)140875663

Diane Lorenzo, MD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

frederic prat, MD, PhD

Role: primary

+33 (0)140875663

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SFED 131

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.