Effectiveness and Safety of Single-session Endoscopic Stone Extraction

NCT ID: NCT06349954

Last Updated: 2025-06-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-04-15

Study Completion Date

2025-01-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective study, including approximately 64 patients with acute cholangitis accompanied with choledocholithiasis at Beijing Friendship Hospital. All patients will be randomly allocate into single-session or two-session endoscopic stone extraction. The investigators assessed the outcomes of single-session and two-session endoscopic stone extraction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Acute cholangitis is an acute inflammation caused by obstruction of the bile duct, of which choledocholithiasis is the most common cause. Without timely removal of the obstruction or control of the infection, cholangitis can get worse and even become life-threatening. Therefore, timely and effective treatment is essential for patients with acute cholangitis combined with choledocholithiasis. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) is used as the first-line treatment for choledocholithiasis-associated acute cholangitis. Previous guidelines recommended two-session endoscopic therapy. Endoscopic biliary drainage as the initial treatment, followed by endoscopic stone extraction after cholangitis improved. In recent years, studies have found that single-session endoscopic stone extraction is safe and effective for patients without serious organ function impairment. Meanwhile, single-session endoscopic lithotomy can avoid the second ERCP intervention, which can relieve the pain of patients, reduce medical costs and shorten the length of hospital stay. However, there is still insufficient evidence on the effectiveness and safety of early single-session ERCP lithotomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-session endoscopic stone extraction for acute cholangitis associated with choledocholithiasis, so as to provide reference of clinical treatment.

In a prospective study, approximately 64 patients with acute cholangitis accompanied with choledocholithiasis will be involved. The investigators assessed the outcomes of single-session and two-session endoscopic stone extraction.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Choledocholithiasis With Acute Cholangitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

All patients will be randomly allocated into single-session group or two-session group.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

single-session treatment group

single-session ERCP

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

single-session ERCP

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

directly endoscopic stone extraction

two-session treatment group

two-session ERCP

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

two-session ERCP

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

early endoscopic drainage followed by endoscopic stone extraction

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

single-session ERCP

directly endoscopic stone extraction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

two-session ERCP

early endoscopic drainage followed by endoscopic stone extraction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 1\. Age ≥18 years old and ≤90 years old
* 2\. Patients met the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) diagnosis of Grade I or Grade II acute cholangitis
* 3\. Imaging examination confirmed the presence of choledocholithiasis

Exclusion Criteria

* 1\. Common bile duct with benign or malignant stenosis
* 2\. Changes in the anatomical structure of the stomach or duodenum
* 3\. Patients with common biliary duct or pancreatic duct stent
* 4\. Patients complicated with acute pancreatitis
* 5\. Patients who underwent endoscopic intervention, percutaneous transhepatic cholangio drainage (PTCD) or other invasive interventions before admission
* 6\. Patients with cardiac failure, respiratory failure or consciousness disorder can not tolerate endoscopic operation
* 7\. Patients who have coagulation dysfunction or are taking anticoagulation and antiplate drugs
* 8\. Imaging examination showed that the maximum diameter of choledocholithiasis was more than 1.5cm
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Beijing Friendship Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fujing Lv, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Beijing Friendship Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beijing Friendship Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BFHHZS20240064

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.