ChOlecystectomy aFter successFul Endoscopic Common Bile Duct Stone Extraction in Elderly

NCT ID: NCT07001423

Last Updated: 2025-10-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-03

Study Completion Date

2032-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this study is to compare safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus wait-and-see policy after endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones in elderly. The primary endpoint is a composite outcome: Death or major postoperative complications or recurrent biliary disease within 1 year after randomization.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Elderly patients with common bile duct stones are asked to participate this randomized trial after successful endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones. The hypothesis of the study is that wait-and-see policy is non-inferior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Four hundred patients are randomized 1:1 to either laparoscopic cholecystectomy group or wait-and see group. Cholecystectomy is done on the same admission or within two weeks after randomization. One interim analysis is planned for the trial after 100 randomized patients to assess safety. The trial is terminated if there is a statistically significant difference in primary outcome with p\<0.001 (chi-square test) between the study arms.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic Choledocholithiasis Cholelithiasis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is done within 2 weeks after endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 2 weeks after endoscopic removal of common bile duct stone

Wait-and-see

After endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones, patients are managed non-operatively. During the follow-up cholecystectomy will be available on demand.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 2 weeks after endoscopic removal of common bile duct stone

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Common bile duct stones cleared after Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio Pancreatography (ERCP)
* Age \>= 80 years or age 75-79 years with a Charlson Comorbidity index \>=2
* gallbladder in situ

Exclusion Criteria

* Acute Cholecystitis
* Biliary Pancreatitis
* Severe or moderately severe post-ERCP pancreatitis
* Chronic pancreatitis
* Bile duct pathology
* Widespread malignancy
* Unable to give consent
Minimum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Helsinki University Central Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Panu Mentula

MD, PhD, Head of Emergency Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Panu Mentula, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Helsinki University Central Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Helsinki University Hospital, Jorvi

Espoo, , Finland

Site Status RECRUITING

Kanta-Häme Central Hospital

Hämeenlinna, , Finland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Helsinki University Hospital, Meilahti

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status RECRUITING

Pohjois-Karjala Central Hospital

Joensuu, , Finland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Keski-Suomi Central Hospital

Jyväskylä, , Finland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Kymenlaakso Central Hospital

Kotka, , Finland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Kuopio University Hospital

Kuopio, , Finland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Päijät-Häme Central Hospital

Lahti, , Finland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Oulu University Hospital

Oulu, , Finland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Tampere University Hospital

Tampere, , Finland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Turku University Hospital

Turku, , Finland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Vaasa Central Hospital

Vaasa, , Finland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Finland

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Panu Mentula, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+358504270183

Päivi Siironen, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+358504271343

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Hanna Malmi, MD, PhD

Role: primary

+358505123553

Päivi Siironen, MD, PhD

Role: primary

+358504271343

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Boerma D, Rauws EA, Keulemans YC, Janssen IM, Bolwerk CJ, Timmer R, Boerma EJ, Obertop H, Huibregtse K, Gouma DJ. Wait-and-see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 Sep 7;360(9335):761-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09896-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12241833 (View on PubMed)

Kivivuori A, Mattila L, Siiki A, Laukkarinen J, Rantanen T, Ukkonen M. Wait-and-see strategy is justified after ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy in elderly patients with common biliary duct stones. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023 Mar 1;94(3):443-447. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003852. Epub 2022 Dec 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36524923 (View on PubMed)

Costi R, DiMauro D, Mazzeo A, Boselli AS, Contini S, Violi V, Roncoroni L, Sarli L. Routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis in octogenarians: is it worth the risk? Surg Endosc. 2007 Jan;21(1):41-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-0169-2. Epub 2006 Nov 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17111279 (View on PubMed)

Bass GA, Gillis AE, Cao Y, Mohseni S; European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) Cohort Studies Group. Patients over 65 years with Acute Complicated Calculous Biliary Disease are Treated Differently-Results and Insights from the ESTES Snapshot Audit. World J Surg. 2021 Jul;45(7):2046-2055. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06052-0. Epub 2021 Apr 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33813631 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

8971

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.