Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography Versus Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Approach to Patients With Suspected Biliary Obstruction
NCT ID: NCT01424657
Last Updated: 2011-08-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
378 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
1997-10-31
2002-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Endoscopic Biliary Drainage in Malignant High Grade Biliary Stricture
NCT03530527
Mid-Atlantic Research Group Single-Operator Cholangioscopic Assessment of Biliary Strictures
NCT02615210
Quality of Life Assessment Between Internal Endoscopic Versus Percutaneous Drainage in Biliary Obstruction
NCT04857424
EUS Biliary Drainage vs. ERCP
NCT03870386
Cholangioscopy or Conventional Techniques for Indeterminate Biliary Stenosis
NCT04840537
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The purpose is to assess the effectiveness of MRCP compared to ERCP in the initial work-up of patients at intermediate risk of suspected biliary obstruction following initial clinical assessment and ultrasonography.
A randomized medical effectiveness study was conducted across three tertiary care hospital sites. Patients at intermediate risk of biliary obstruction were randomized to either ERCP or MRCP based on level of obstruction as seen by ultrasound (US).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ERCP
ERCP is an endoscopic examination that allows opacification of the biliary tree by direct injection into the common bile duct through its distal opening in the duodenum at the ampulla of Vater
ERCP
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
MRCP
The magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)allows direct visualization of the biliary tree and pancreatic duct, similar to contrast cholangiography, but without the need for administration of contrast medium
MRCP
magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ERCP
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
MRCP
magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Elevated bilirubin (\>30 umol/L)
* CBD dilatation on ultrasound: greater than 7 mm wide with gallbladder in situ, or 10mm wide in patient post-cholecystectomy
* Suspected or detected gallstone on ultrasound
Exclusion Criteria
* Active cholangitis
* Bilio-pancreatic pathology identified on ultrasound or CT scan
* Any clinical condition precluding MRCP or ERCP: severe cardio-respiratory disease, pregnancy, significant coagulopathy (INR over 1.5)
* Presence of Roux-en-Y bilio-enteric anastomosis
* Any metallic implant making ERCP or MRCP hazardous
* ERCP or MRCP performed within 6 months prior to study inclusion
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research
OTHER
American College of Gastroenterology
OTHER
American Digestive Health Foundation
UNKNOWN
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
OTHER_GOV
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alan Barkun
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
MUHC- McGill University Health Center
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bhat M, Romagnuolo J, da Silveira E, Reinhold C, Valois E, Martel M, Barkun JS, Barkun AN. Randomised clinical trial: MRCP-first vs. ERCP-first approach in patients with suspected biliary obstruction due to bile duct stones. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Nov;38(9):1045-53. doi: 10.1111/apt.12481. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REC. 97-026
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.