Primary Precutting Versus Conventional Over-the-Wire Sphinchterotomy For Managment Of Large Common Bile Duct Stones

NCT ID: NCT06106724

Last Updated: 2023-10-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-09-15

Study Completion Date

2024-09-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

During the last decades, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has become the standard of care for the treatment of many pancreaticobiliary diseases \[Canena et al., 2014\]. However, ERCP is a challenging technique with a slow learning curve and is associated with complications, some of them lifethreatening \[Chandrasekhara et al., 2017\].

Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common and serious complication after ERCP \[Testoni et al., 2016\]. A systematic survey of prospective studies including 16,885 patients reported an incidence of PEP of approximately 3.5%. Severe pancreatitis was found in 11% of the cases, and death occurred in 3% of PEP cases \[Andriulli et al., 2007\]. Therefore, many attempts to reduce the rate of this complication have been pursued. Selective cannulation of the common bile duct (CBD) is still considered to be a prerequisite for biliary sphincterotomy. Despite the use of various endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) catheters and wire-guided sphincterotomes, CBD cannulation has been reported to fail in 5 % - 20 % of cases \[Larkin and Huibregtse, 2001\]. Precut sphincterotomy can allow access to the bile duct in such cases and is widely performed by expert endoscopists when there is a clear indication for endoscopic intervention. However, the use of precut sphincterotomy remains controversial because reported complication rates of the widely practiced needle-knife sphincterotomy (NKS) technique vary between 5 % and 20 % \[Shakoor and Geenen, 1992\]. Precut sphincterotomy, which includes needle-knife papillotomy (NKP), septotomy, and needle-knife fistulotomy (NKF), is often performed to facilitate access to the common bile duct of patients with difficult biliary access (DBA). Furthermore, NKF has been recommended as the preferred technique for precutting by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy \[Testoni et al., 2016\] and the latest International Consensus\[Liao et al., 2017\]. The success of NKS also depends on the expertise of the endoscopist, and the consensus opinion is that this technique should only be performed by experienced endoscopists \[Baillie,1997 \]. In contrast to NKS, incision of the papilla of Vater using an Erlangen-type precut sphincterotome has been previously reported by Binmoeller et al group to be an effective and safe auxiliary method for achieving access to the CBD after failed cannulation attempts \[Binmoeller et al., 1996\]. The definition of DBA varied widely \[Mariani et al., 2016\]. The latest guidelines for the definition of DBA differed widely from the latest guideline of The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (defining DBA as the presence of ≥1 of the following: \>5 contacts with the papilla while attempting to cannulate; \>5 minutes spent attempting to cannulate following visualization of the papilla; \>1 2 unintended pancreatic duct cannulation or opacification) \[Testoni et al., 2016\]. and the International Consensus Panel (defining DBA as the inability to achieve selective biliary cannulation by the standard ERCP technique within 10 minutes or up to 5 attempts or failure of access to the major papilla) \[Liao et al., 2017 \].

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Calcular Obstructive Jaundice

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

group A

sphencterotomy of papilla by conventuional methodes

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

sphincterotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

cutting the papilla and cannulation with sweeping of common bile duct by ballon and stent insertion

group B

precutting of the papilla by knife needle

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

precutting of the papilla by knife needle

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

precutting of the papilla by knife needle

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

sphincterotomy

cutting the papilla and cannulation with sweeping of common bile duct by ballon and stent insertion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

precutting of the papilla by knife needle

precutting of the papilla by knife needle

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with difficult biliary access (DBA) consenting to randomization in an interventional design randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare precut sphincterotomy (EPS) with persistent cannulation attempts (PCA).
* Patients who required biliary cannulation but without previous sphincterotomy.

Exclusion Criteria

-Patients with coagulopathy or acute pancreatitis.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sohag University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed Bahaa Abdelazim

assistant lecteurer tropical medicine department sohag univerisity hospital

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sohag university Hospital

Sohag, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

ahmed B abdelazeam, assistant lecutrer

Role: CONTACT

01015700097

Asmaa N Mohamed, professor

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Magdy M Amin, professor

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Canena J, Liberato M, Coutinho AP, Marques I, Romao C, Veiga PM, Neves BC. Predictive value of cholangioscopy after endoscopic management of early postcholecystectomy bile duct strictures with an increasing number of plastic stents: a prospective study (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Feb;79(2):279-88. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.07.022. Epub 2013 Sep 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24012251 (View on PubMed)

ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Chandrasekhara V, Khashab MA, Muthusamy VR, Acosta RD, Agrawal D, Bruining DH, Eloubeidi MA, Fanelli RD, Faulx AL, Gurudu SR, Kothari S, Lightdale JR, Qumseya BJ, Shaukat A, Wang A, Wani SB, Yang J, DeWitt JM. Adverse events associated with ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jan;85(1):32-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.06.051. Epub 2016 Aug 18. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27546389 (View on PubMed)

Testoni PA, Mariani A, Aabakken L, Arvanitakis M, Bories E, Costamagna G, Deviere J, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Dumonceau JM, Giovannini M, Gyokeres T, Hafner M, Halttunen J, Hassan C, Lopes L, Papanikolaou IS, Tham TC, Tringali A, van Hooft J, Williams EJ. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2016 Jul;48(7):657-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108641. Epub 2016 Jun 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27299638 (View on PubMed)

Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, Niro G, Valvano MR, Spirito F, Pilotto A, Forlano R. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug;102(8):1781-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x. Epub 2007 May 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17509029 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

soh-Med-23-09-3MD

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.