Efficacy of Fistulotomy for Biliary Cannulation

NCT ID: NCT04037007

Last Updated: 2025-05-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

320 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-07-03

Study Completion Date

2026-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Access to the main bile duct is the first step in order to perform a therapeutic maneuver for biliary diseases. Early precut has been shown to ameliorate cannulation success rate, specially in difficult cannulation cases, when compared to guidewire cannulation (which is considered, for most, the standard technique). We aim to perform a randomized clinical trial comparing fistulotomy (F) precut vs guidewire cannulation (CC), as a primary cannulation technique, and compare outcomes between high experienced endoscopists (\> 200 ERCPs\[Endoscopic Retrograde cholangiopancreatography\]) and low experienced endoscopists (\< 200 ERCPs).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Endoscopic Retrograde Pancreatography Cholangiography (ERCP) is the standard procedure for the treatment of pathologies that affect the bile duct. Approaching to the ampulla followed by deep selective biliary cannulation is the first step in order to apply any therapeutic method for bile duct pathologies. In patients with a normal anatomy it is estimated that about 11% of therapeutic ERCPs will be considered difficult biliary cannulation (duration of cannulation\> 5 minutes, more than 5 attempts, \> 1 cannulation of the main pancreatic duct). When early conventional precut has been compared to guidewire cannulation, cannulation success is in favor of precut with 86.7% compared to 66.7%; with a lower post-ERCP acute pancreatitis event rate: 6.1% vs 9.1%.

Objective: To determine the rate of biliary cannulation by comparing two techniques (fistulotomy versus standard biliary cannulation technique with guidewire) according to the endoscopist experience in ERCP.

Material and methods: A randomized prospective clinical trial will be conducted in the gastrointestinal endoscopy department of the CMN SXXI specialties hospital between the period of August 2019 and March 2020. 2 groups will be assigned as following: in group A the primary approach to access the bile duct will be conventional cannulation (CC) with guidewire, and group B for fistulotomy (F). On the other hand, there will be 2 groups of endoscopists (high experience\> 200 ERCP) \[HE\] and low experience (\<200 ERCP) \[LE\]. In total 4 groups: CCHE, CCLE, FHE, FLE. All patients undergoing ERCP with suspected or confirmed of choledocholithiasis, malignant and benign stenosis of the bile duct, men and women between 18 and 90 years will be included. Exclusion criteria: patients with previous ERCP, gastro-duodenal anatomy altered by previous surgery, suspicion or diagnosis of ampullary neoplasm, duodenal cancer, periampullar diverticula types 1 and 2, pregnant women, coagulopathy with INR greater than 1.5. Elimination criteria: patients with incomplete ERCP due to adverse anesthesia events. The reason and indication of the ERCP study will be determined, a data collection sheet will be used compiling: clinical data such as age, sex, concomitant diseases, symptoms, biochemical data, imaging studies (abdominal ultrasound, abdominal CT and MRCP), findings on ERCP (characteristics of the papilla, presence of periampullar diverticula); details of the cannulation technique such as the number of attempts, time to access the bile duct. A comparison will be made between both techniques and both groups HE and LE. The success rate of biliary cannulation and complication for both groups of doctors and maneuvers used will be documented.

Statistical analysis: Continuous variables will be described with mean, median or standard deviation according to their distribution; and categorical variables will be described as percentages. Categorical variables will be compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test, while quantitative variables will be compared using T-Student or Mann Whitney U test. A P less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant (for T-Student and Mann-Whitney U will be 2-tailed). A sample size of 80 patients for each group was calculated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cholangiocarcinoma Choledocholithiasis; Cholangitis Pancreatic Cancer Pancreatitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

We aim to perform a randomized clinical trial comparing fistulotomy (F) precut vs guidewire cannulation (CC), as a primary cannulation technique, and compare outcomes between high experienced endoscopists (\> 200 ERCPs) and low experienced endoscopists (\< 200 ERCPs).
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
The participant will be allocated to one group of the intervention conventional guidewire biliary cannulation or fistulotomy based on program software

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Fistulotomy - High experienced

Fistulotomy precut with a needle knife, ERBE Endocut I, Effect 2; as the primary cannulation technique in high experienced endoscopists.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fistulotomy - High experienced.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

We will perform a duodenoscopy, once located next to the papilla, we will perform precut fistulotomy on the papillary infundibulum with a needle knife with EBRE, EndoCut I, Effect 2, until biliary fluid exit is seen or the biliary duct is noted, then we will access to the biliary tree to complete de procedure.

Fistulotomy - Low experienced

Fistulotomy precut with a needle knife, ERBE Endocut I, Effect 2; as the primary cannulation technique in low experienced endoscopists.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fistulotomy - Low experienced.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

We will perform a duodenoscopy, once located next to the papilla, we will perform precut fistulotomy on the papillary infundibulum with a needle knife with EBRE, EndoCut I, Effect 2, until biliary fluid exit is seen or the biliary duct is noted, then we will access to the biliary tree to complete de procedure.

Conventional (guidewire) cannulation- High experience

Conventional cannulation with an sphincterotome and 0.035 inch hydrophilic tip guidewire as the primary cannulation technique in high experienced endoscopists.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional (guidewire) cannulation- High experienced

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

We will perform a duodenoscopy, once located next to the papilla, we will perform cannulation with sphincterotome and hydrophilic tipped guidewire aided by fluoroscopy, once the guidewire reaches de common bile duct (seen on fluoroscopy) we will continue with the procedure according to the patient's indication.

Conventional (guidewire) cannulation - Low experienced.

Conventional cannulation with an sphincterotome and 0.035 inch hydrophilic tip guidewire as the primary cannulation technique in low experienced endoscopists.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional (guidewire) cannulation - Low experienced

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

We will perform a duodenoscopy, once located next to the papilla, we will perform cannulation with sphincterotome and hydrophilic tipped guidewire aided by fluoroscopy, once the guidewire reaches de common bile duct (seen on fluoroscopy) we will continue with the procedure according to the patient's indication.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fistulotomy - High experienced.

We will perform a duodenoscopy, once located next to the papilla, we will perform precut fistulotomy on the papillary infundibulum with a needle knife with EBRE, EndoCut I, Effect 2, until biliary fluid exit is seen or the biliary duct is noted, then we will access to the biliary tree to complete de procedure.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Fistulotomy - Low experienced.

We will perform a duodenoscopy, once located next to the papilla, we will perform precut fistulotomy on the papillary infundibulum with a needle knife with EBRE, EndoCut I, Effect 2, until biliary fluid exit is seen or the biliary duct is noted, then we will access to the biliary tree to complete de procedure.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional (guidewire) cannulation- High experienced

We will perform a duodenoscopy, once located next to the papilla, we will perform cannulation with sphincterotome and hydrophilic tipped guidewire aided by fluoroscopy, once the guidewire reaches de common bile duct (seen on fluoroscopy) we will continue with the procedure according to the patient's indication.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional (guidewire) cannulation - Low experienced

We will perform a duodenoscopy, once located next to the papilla, we will perform cannulation with sphincterotome and hydrophilic tipped guidewire aided by fluoroscopy, once the guidewire reaches de common bile duct (seen on fluoroscopy) we will continue with the procedure according to the patient's indication.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients undergoing ERCP with suspected or confirmed of choledocholithiasis, malignant and benign biliary stenosis.

Exclusion Criteria

* patients with previous ERCP, altered gastro-duodenal anatomy by previous surgery, suspicion or diagnosis of ampullary neoplasm, duodenal cancer, periampullary diverticula types 1 and 2, pregnant women, coagulopathy with INR greater than 1.5.

Elimination Criteria:

\- Incomplete procedure due to anesthesia adverse events.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Oscar V Hernandez Mondragon, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centro Medico Nacional Siglo XXI Hospital de Especialidades

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Mexico

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Oscar V Hernández Mondragón, MD

Role: CONTACT

+525556276900 ext. 21317-8

Carlos Mendoza Segura, Fellow

Role: CONTACT

+525556276900 ext. 21317-8

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Oscar V Hernández Mondragón, MD

Role: primary

+525556276900 ext. 21317-8

Carlos Mendoza Segura, Fellow

Role: backup

+525556276900 ext. 21317-8

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lopes L, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rolanda C. Early precut fistulotomy for biliary access: time to change the paradigm of "the later, the better"? Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Oct;80(4):634-641. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.03.014. Epub 2014 May 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24814775 (View on PubMed)

Jin YJ, Jeong S, Lee DH. Utility of needle-knife fistulotomy as an initial method of biliary cannulation to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in a highly selected at-risk group: a single-arm prospective feasibility study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Nov;84(5):808-813. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 Apr 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27102829 (View on PubMed)

Furuya CK, Sakai P, Marinho FRT, Otoch JP, Cheng S, Prudencio LL, de Moura EGH, Artifon ELA. Papillary fistulotomy vs conventional cannulation for endoscopic biliary access: A prospective randomized trial. World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr 28;24(16):1803-1811. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i16.1803.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29713133 (View on PubMed)

Abu-Hamda EM, Baron TH, Simmons DT, Petersen BT. A retrospective comparison of outcomes using three different precut needle knife techniques for biliary cannulation. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005 Sep;39(8):717-21. doi: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000173928.82986.56.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16082283 (View on PubMed)

Mavrogiannis C, Liatsos C, Romanos A, Petoumenos C, Nakos A, Karvountzis G. Needle-knife fistulotomy versus needle-knife precut papillotomy for the treatment of common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Sep;50(3):334-9. doi: 10.1053/ge.1999.v50.98593.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10462652 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R-2019-3601-147

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.